Discussion of PostgreSQL's performance issues. Please see Guide to reporting problems and Slow Query Questions for some tips on how to write your performance question.
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Error while calling proc with table type from Application (npgsql) | aditya desai | 13:02 |
Re: Error while calling proc with table type from Application (npgsql) | aditya desai | 13:22 |
Re: Error while calling proc with table type from Application (npgsql) | Vijaykumar Jain | 17:43 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Alex | 19:45 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Justin Pryzby | 20:18 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Alex | 09:21 |
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Rick Otten | 12:12 |
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Alex | 13:59 |
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Laurenz Albe | 15:22 |
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Vijaykumar Jain | 15:50 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | David Rowley | 06:57 |
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Justin Pryzby | 06:59 |
Re: 15x slower PreparedStatement vs raw query | Alex | 15:21 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 14:38 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | luis.roberto | 16:11 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Alexey M Boltenkov | 18:15 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Alexey M Boltenkov | 18:20 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 18:59 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 19:26 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Vijaykumar Jain | 19:48 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server 📎 | Alexey M Boltenkov | 19:58 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Justin Pryzby | 20:01 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Alexey M Boltenkov | 20:02 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Alexey M Boltenkov | 20:17 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Imre Samu | 21:16 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 08:04 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Vijaykumar Jain | 08:44 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 09:02 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Vijaykumar Jain | 09:55 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Rick Otten | 12:50 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 15:57 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Justin Pryzby | 16:15 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Tom Lane | 16:28 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Peter Geoghegan | 21:28 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Peter Geoghegan | 21:43 |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | didier | 22:17 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 12:06 |
Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories | Tom Lane | 16:39 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server | Semen Yefimenko | 11:14 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization | Eugen Konkov | 13:35 |
PostgreSQL blocked locks query | Manoj Kumar | 13:54 |
Re: PostgreSQL blocked locks query | Justin Pryzby | 20:09 |
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization | David Rowley | 23:52 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
RE: Re: PostgreSQL blocked locks query | Manoj Kumar | 06:51 |
Very slow "bloat query" | Marcin Gozdalik | 11:06 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Gilles Darold | 11:50 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Imre Samu | 12:07 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Marcin Gozdalik | 12:11 |
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization 📎 | KES | 12:39 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Tom Lane | 15:04 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Marcin Gozdalik | 15:15 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Imre Samu | 15:44 |
Re: Very slow "bloat query" | Marcin Gozdalik | 15:47 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization 📎 | Eugen Konkov | 14:34 |
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization | David Rowley | 14:52 |
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization | David Rowley | 14:59 |
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization | Eugen Konkov | 16:10 |
Re: BUG #16968: Planner does not recognize optimization | Eugen Konkov | 16:10 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Index and statistics not used | rstander | 20:42 |
Re: Index and statistics not used | David Rowley | 22:31 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Partition with check constraint with "like" | David Rowley | 01:38 |
Re: Partition with check constraint with "like" | David Rowley | 01:38 |
RE: Partition with check constraint with "like" | Michel SALAIS | 05:41 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
transaction blocking on COMMIT | Bob Jolliffe | 11:30 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Vijaykumar Jain | 11:35 |
Optimising outer joins in the presence of non-nullable references 📎 | Philip Lykke Carlsen | 12:10 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Bob Jolliffe | 13:52 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Vijaykumar Jain | 14:09 |
Re: Optimising outer joins in the presence of non-nullable references | Tom Lane | 14:11 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Bob Jolliffe | 16:22 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Christophe Pettus | 16:24 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Alexey M Boltenkov | 21:59 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
issue partition scan | Nagaraj Raj | 22:50 |
Re: issue partition scan | Christophe Pettus | 23:01 |
Re: issue partition scan | Nagaraj Raj | 23:38 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: issue partition scan | David Rowley | 00:16 |
Re: issue partition scan | Christophe Pettus | 00:27 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Count (select 1) subquery as constant | Eugen Konkov | 10:37 |
Re: transaction blocking on COMMIT | Bob Jolliffe | 13:08 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 03:07 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Christophe Pettus | 03:41 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 04:23 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Tom Lane | 04:44 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 05:24 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Justin Pryzby | 04:16 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 17:44 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
slow query with inline function on AWS RDS with RDS 24x large | Ayub Khan | 08:06 |
Re: slow query with inline function on AWS RDS with RDS 24x large | Pavel Stehule | 08:22 |
Re: slow query with inline function on AWS RDS with RDS 24x large | Ayub Khan | 08:32 |
Re: slow query with inline function on AWS RDS with RDS 24x large | Pavel Stehule | 08:40 |
Re: slow query with inline function on AWS RDS with RDS 24x large | Ayub Khan | 08:51 |
PgSQL 12 on WinSrv ~3x faster than on Linux | Taras Savchuk | 11:53 |
Re: PgSQL 12 on WinSrv ~3x faster than on Linux | David Rowley | 12:42 |
Re: PgSQL 12 on WinSrv ~3x faster than on Linux | Vijaykumar Jain | 13:14 |
Re: PgSQL 12 on WinSrv ~3x faster than on Linux | Tom Lane | 13:40 |
RE: PgSQL 12 on WinSrv ~3x faster than on Linux | Taras Savchuk | 14:01 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
query planner not using index, instead using squential scan | Ayub Khan | 16:42 |
Re: query planner not using index, instead using squential scan | Tom Lane | 19:29 |
Re: query planner not using index, instead using squential scan | Vijaykumar Jain | 19:52 |
Re: query planner not using index, instead using squential scan | Ayub Khan | 21:14 |
Re: query planner not using index, instead using squential scan | Vijaykumar Jain | 21:18 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 23:49 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
dexter on AWS RDS auto tune queries | Ayub Khan | 04:51 |
Re: dexter on AWS RDS auto tune queries | Julien Rouhaud | 04:57 |
Re: dexter on AWS RDS auto tune queries | Christophe Pettus | 05:00 |
Re: dexter on AWS RDS auto tune queries | Ayub Khan | 07:49 |
Re: dexter on AWS RDS auto tune queries | Julien Rouhaud | 07:57 |
Re: dexter on AWS RDS auto tune queries | Ayub Khan | 10:05 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Andrew Dunstan | 11:52 |
Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 17:27 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
slow query | Ayub Khan | 16:03 |
Re: slow query | Christophe Pettus | 16:08 |
Re: slow query | Ayub Khan | 16:32 |
Re: slow query | Tom Lane | 17:14 |
Re: slow query | Ayub Khan | 17:43 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
waiting for client write 📎 | Ayub Khan | 14:47 |
Re: waiting for client write | Magnus Hagander | 14:49 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 18:59 |
Re: slow query | Jeff Janes | 19:57 |
Re: slow query | Ayub Khan | 20:23 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 16:28 |
Re: waiting for client write | Pavan Pusuluri | 16:46 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ranier Vilela | 16:52 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 16:59 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ranier Vilela | 17:37 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 17:59 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ranier Vilela | 18:03 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 18:19 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ranier Vilela | 18:25 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 19:45 |
Re: waiting for client write | Jeff Janes | 21:58 |
Re: waiting for client write | Ayub Khan | 22:06 |