pgsql-hackers since 2002-01-16 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Jan. 16, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue 00:19
Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii 00:58
Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Bruce Momjian 02:15
Procedural language permissions and consequences Peter Eisentraut 03:09
Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Doug McNaught 03:36
Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane 05:22
Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Bruce Momjian 05:23
Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Tom Lane 05:37
Re: Psql in cluster-machines Luis Amigo 07:48
Oracle to Postgres comparision erigeneni srinivasulu 07:48
Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder 08:26
Re: Oracle to Postgres comparision mlw 12:35
backend/po, make update-po works strange Kovacs Zoltan 14:09
Re: RServ replication Turbo Fredriksson 15:48
Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Peter Eisentraut 16:23
Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Peter Eisentraut 16:41
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 17:10
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 17:24
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 17:29
Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Peter Eisentraut 17:40
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 17:40
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Command Prompt, Inc. 17:46
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 18:06
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck 18:16
Re: RServ replication Justin Clift 18:28
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 18:30
Error in 7.2 rbt 19:26
Re: again on index usage Hiroshi Inoue 19:55
Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Kovacs Zoltan 20:00
Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Tom Lane 20:18
Re: Error in 7.2 Tom Lane 20:44
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is 📎 Doug Royer 20:57
Re: RServ replication mlw 20:59
Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Peter Eisentraut 21:01
Re: Error in 7.2 Rod Taylor 21:12
Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Tom Lane 21:30
question with beta5 Matthew T. O'Connor 22:26
Re: question with beta5 Tom Lane 23:03
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian 23:10

Jan. 17, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Ignore this one ... Yasuo Ohgaki 00:46
help regarding Postgresql? D'laila Pereira 02:28
Re: [HACKERS] [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is Justin Clift 02:34
RC1 date? Bruce Momjian 06:15
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW / TRIGGER Jean-Michel POURE 09:06
Re: Problem in ResultSet#getTimestamp() of 7.2b4 📎 Ryouichi Matsuda 11:00
Performance Turbo Fredriksson 12:25
Re: RC1 date? Marc G. Fournier 12:59
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 13:03
jdbc:postgresql problem Vardan Gyurjyan 13:04
Re: RC1 date? Daniel Kalchev 13:16
Re: Problem in ResultSet#getTimestamp() of 7.2b4 📎 Thomas O'Dowd 13:57
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 14:08
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 14:12
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 14:22
can't shrink relation Gavin Sherry 14:50
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW / TRIGGER Jan Wieck 15:04
Re: can't shrink relation Tom Lane 15:16
Re: [ADMIN] CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW / TRIGGER Tom Lane 15:33
Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 17:49
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck 18:11
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Brent Verner 18:25
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 18:38
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 21:47
guc 📎 Liam Stewart 21:54
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 22:27
Re: [PATCHES] guc Peter Eisentraut 22:35
Re: [PATCHES] guc Tom Lane 22:57
Re: [PATCHES] guc Bruce Momjian 23:12
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o 📎 Bruce Momjian 23:43

Jan. 18, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is 📎 Doug Royer 00:05
UPDATE Query problem Josh Berkus 00:55
Re: UPDATE Query problem Tom Lane 01:20
Re: UPDATE Query problem Stephan Szabo 01:20
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue 01:55
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o 📎 Tom Lane 02:05
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 02:07
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue 02:27
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 03:12
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner 03:46
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner 03:50
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck 03:55
Re: UPDATE Query problem Josh Berkus 03:59
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue 04:00
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 04:08
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 04:10
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner 04:13
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 04:14
Re: UPDATE Query problem Tom Lane 04:14
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 04:16
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian 04:20
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 04:24
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 04:26
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 04:30
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 04:34
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 04:36
pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian 04:42
age() function? Tatsuo Ishii 04:47
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue 05:10
Re: age() function? Tom Lane 05:11
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian 05:12
Re: [PATCHES] guc Peter Eisentraut 05:17
Re: UPDATE Query problem Josh Berkus 05:18
Re: [PATCHES] guc Tom Lane 05:21
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck 05:21
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian 05:27
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane 05:27
Re: age() function? Tatsuo Ishii 05:38
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue 05:45
Re: [PATCHES] guc Peter Eisentraut 05:48
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian 05:53
Re: age() function? Bruce Momjian 05:54
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck 06:06
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Joe Conway 06:16
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o 📎 Philip Warner 06:28
Geometric types (was Re: [PATCHES] guc) Tom Lane 06:31
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 06:31
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Joe Conway 06:36
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner 06:42
Re: age() function? Thomas Lockhart 07:23
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue 07:48
pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 13:37
contrib: int_array_aggregator() int_array_enum() 📎 mlw 14:17
Re: help regarding Postgresql? steve boyle 14:59
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 15:04
[Robert.Hufsky@ser.at: autocommit in ecpg] Michael Meskes 15:54
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 16:24
7.2b5 notes Dwayne Miller 16:41
Re: [PATCHES] guc Liam Stewart 17:00
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 17:02
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane 17:15
Re: [PATCHES] guc Tom Lane 17:19
Re: 7.2b5 notes Peter Eisentraut 18:30
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian 19:15
Confusing terminology Peter Eisentraut 19:17
postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Joe Conway (wwc) 19:31
Re: Confusing terminology Tom Lane 19:42
Re: Recovering a database Doug McNaught 19:47
Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Vince Vielhaber 19:52
Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Tom Lane 19:57
Re: Recover old version database files. Doug McNaught 19:59
Text Column limits Chris Bowlby 19:59
Re: Recovering a database Matthew T. O'Connor 20:08
Re: Ignorance time: when is 7.2 due ? Bruce Momjian 20:09
Re: Confusing terminology Bruce Momjian 20:12
Re: user types API wish list Tom Lane 20:16
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 20:17
Re: Text Column limits Doug McNaught 20:27
Re: [Robert.Hufsky@ser.at: autocommit in ecpg] 📎 Bruce Momjian 20:32
Re: More problem with scripts Bruce Momjian 20:59
Re: Text Column limits Chris Bowlby 21:02
Re: Text Column limits Doug McNaught 21:05
Re: Confusing terminology Peter Eisentraut 21:17
Re: Confusing terminology Bruce Momjian 21:29
Re: Confusing terminology Mike Mascari 21:45
Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Joe Conway (wwc) 21:51
Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Jason Earl 22:34
Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Vince Vielhaber 22:37
Re: UPDATE Query problem Josh Berkus 23:02
Re: Confusing terminology Roderick A. Anderson 23:54
Re: Confusing terminology Arguile 23:57

Jan. 19, 2002

Thread Author Time
Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures Stephen P. Berry 00:24
pg_dump question Laurette Cisneros 00:26
Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Tom Lane 00:29
Re: pg_dump question Bruce Momjian 00:57
Re: pg_dump question Laurette Cisneros 00:59
Re: Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures Tom Lane 01:30
Re: Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures Stephen P. Berry 03:01
Re: Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures Tom Lane 03:28
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 04:09
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 04:12
Re: Confusing terminology carl garland 04:13
Ready for RC1? Tom Lane 05:24
Re: Ready for RC1? Marc G. Fournier 05:34
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 07:58
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner 08:19
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 08:40
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 09:09
Re: [NOVICE] Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures mlw 14:02
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 17:36
Re: Confusing terminology Roderick A. Anderson 17:58
Re: Confusing terminology Arguile 18:03
Re: Confusing terminology Mike Mascari 18:44

Jan. 20, 2002

Thread Author Time
PostgreSQL 8.0 and cross-platform capabilities Justin Clift 05:46
Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 and cross-platform capabilities Marc G. Fournier 07:15
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Murray Prior Hobbs 07:57
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner 11:59
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner 12:36
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 17:35
RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane 18:40
Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Bruce Momjian 19:10
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 19:14
AOL buying RedHat? Vince Vielhaber 19:19
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 20:58
PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL alavoor 21:03
Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu Peter Eisentraut 21:11
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Peter Eisentraut 21:12
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane 21:33
Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane 21:43
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw 21:50
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier 21:54

Browse Archives

Prev | Next