pgsql-hackers since 2001-08-04 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Aug. 4, 2001

Thread Author Time
Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Giles Lean 00:56
Re: patch for contrib/intarray (current CVS) Bruce Momjian 19:35
Re: patch for contrib/intarray (current CVS) Bruce Momjian 19:36
Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" Bruce Momjian 19:39
Re: Small patch for Hurd Bruce Momjian 19:42
Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" Tom Lane 19:51
Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" 📎 Bruce Momjian 22:03
Question about todo item Barry Lind 23:41

Aug. 5, 2001

Thread Author Time
Re: Question about todo item Bruce Momjian 01:14
Re: Question about todo item Barry Lind 01:35
Re: Question about todo item Bruce Momjian 01:51
Re: Question about todo item Tom Lane 02:33
Re: Question about todo item Bruce Momjian 02:35
Re: Question about todo item Tom Lane 02:38
Re: Question about todo item Bruce Momjian 02:41
Re: Question about todo item Tom Lane 03:11
Re: Question about todo item Bruce Momjian 03:34
Re: Question about todo item Tom Lane 03:55
Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Bruce Momjian 04:32
Re: Question about todo item Hannu Krosing 05:48
Re: Question about todo item Hannu Krosing 06:13
RE: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue 14:03
Re: Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Tom Lane 14:34
Re: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal mlw 14:59
Re: Name for new VACUUM Hannu Krosing 17:38
Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM Hannu Krosing 17:45
Re: Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Hannu Krosing 17:52
Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM Hannu Krosing 18:00
Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM Hannu Krosing 18:10
Re: Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Bruce Momjian 18:30
Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM Tom Lane 18:38
Re: Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Tom Lane 18:44
Re: Failed compile PostgreSQL 7.1.2 on AIX 5.1 Peter Eisentraut 19:34
Re: Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Bruce Momjian 19:38
Re: config.guess on OpenUnix 8... Peter Eisentraut 19:49
Re: Autoconf 2.50 is out (was Re: [PATCHES] Re: OpenUnix 8 Patch) Peter Eisentraut 19:55
Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Peter Eisentraut 20:00
Mailbox messed up Peter Eisentraut 20:04
Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Tom Lane 20:09
Re: Fw: Translators wanted Peter Eisentraut 20:10
Re: Mailbox messed up Sean Chittenden 20:17
Re: Re: Autoconf 2.50 is out (was Re: [PATCHES] Re: OpenUnix 8 Patch) Tom Lane 20:17
Re: Patch for Improved Syntax Error Reporting Peter Eisentraut 20:37
Possible solution for LIKE optimization Peter Eisentraut 22:28
Sorry about that unsubscribe Digital Wokan 22:44
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 23:01
Re: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue 23:33

Aug. 6, 2001

Thread Author Time
Re: Linking a shared library against a C function Peter Eisentraut 00:21
Re: Autoconf 2.50 is out (was Re: [PATCHES] Re: OpenUnix 8 Patch) Larry Rosenman 00:23
Re: Idea for nested transactions / savepoints Bruce Momjian 01:16
partial index Tatsuo Ishii 01:27
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Peter Eisentraut 01:45
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 01:52
Re: partial index Tom Lane 01:59
Re: Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Bruce Momjian 02:55
Vim! Grant 03:09
AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 06:38
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Hiroshi Inoue 07:19
AW: partial index Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 07:29
Re: PL/pgSQL: Return multiple rows Turbo Fredriksson 07:29
AW: Name for new VACUUM Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 07:55
Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal mlw 11:17
user guide Tony Grant 11:40
Re: Vim! Rene Pijlman 11:44
RE: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 12:17
Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Alex Pilosov 12:29
Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal mlw 12:42
Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Alex Pilosov 12:50
failed: make install prefix=/foo/bar Karel Zak 13:24
config.guess updated in CVS Peter Eisentraut 14:07
Re: AW: partial index Tom Lane 14:08
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 14:16
Re: Question about todo item Jan Wieck 14:35
Re: Question about todo item Jan Wieck 14:40
Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 14:48
Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 14:50
Re: Question about todo item Tom Lane 14:53
RE: AW: partial index Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 15:05
Re: AW: partial index Tom Lane 15:25
Re: user guide David Wheeler 15:35
Re: Question about todo item Hannu Krosing 16:00
Re: failed: make install prefix=/foo/bar Peter Eisentraut 16:00
Re: AW: partial index Tom Lane 16:16
Re: user guide Tom Lane 16:19
Re: user guide Peter Eisentraut 16:27
RE: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue 17:46
RE: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Hiroshi Inoue 17:47
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 18:31
RE: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Peter Eisentraut 19:07
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 19:08
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 19:15
Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal mlw 19:29
Not representable result out of too large range Peter Eisentraut 19:40
Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 19:45
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Peter Eisentraut 19:47
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 19:49
Re: Not representable result out of too large range Tom Lane 20:02
Notes about int8 sequences Tom Lane 20:27
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Allan Engelhardt 21:24
Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators? Tom Lane 21:27
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Tom Lane 21:33
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Giles Lean 21:46
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Tom Lane 22:21
Re: Re: Notes about int8 sequences Roderick A. Anderson 22:34
Re: Re: Notes about int8 sequences Tom Lane 23:02
Re: user guide Chris 23:05
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Hiroshi Inoue 23:40

Aug. 7, 2001

Thread Author Time
Re: user guide Thomas Lockhart 00:07
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Thomas Lockhart 00:12
Re: [GENERAL] Re: user guide Tom Lane 00:14
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Tom Lane 00:32
Planned change in initdb-time OID allocation Tom Lane 01:41
FTI contrib Christopher Kings-Lynne 02:01
Re: FTI contrib Tom Lane 02:43
Re: Planned change in initdb-time OID allocation Mike Mascari 02:50
Re: Planned change in initdb-time OID allocation Bruce Momjian 02:51
Re: Planned change in initdb-time OID allocation Tom Lane 03:24
To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Justin Clift 04:03
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 04:09
Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 04:14
Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 05:09
Re: Re: Notes about int8 sequences Lincoln Yeoh 06:20
Re: failed: make install prefix=/foo/bar Karel Zak 06:52
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Matthew Kirkwood 07:17
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tatsuo Ishii 08:24
Re: failed: make install prefix=/foo/bar Peter Eisentraut 10:13
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 13:35
Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 13:48
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Tom Lane 13:51
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier 13:54
Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Neil Tiffin 14:34
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane 14:47
Re: Notes about int8 sequences Matthew Kirkwood 14:53
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Fernando Nasser 15:17
Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 15:22
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Bruce Momjian 15:28
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 15:36
CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Ian Lance Taylor 15:59
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 16:10
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 16:15
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Bruce Momjian 16:54
FW: [JDBC] BIGINT vs Java's long Dave Cramer 17:19
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Paul Ramsey 17:21
Re: Client Side Connection Pooling Doug McNaught 17:43
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Tom Lane 18:01
Re: Recovery error Tom Lane 18:10
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Tom Lane 18:17
Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Neil Tiffin 18:19
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov 18:25
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Bruce Momjian 18:26
Re: FW: [JDBC] BIGINT vs Java's long 📎 Stephan Szabo 18:40
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Paul Ramsey 18:46
Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" Neil Padgett 18:48
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Tom Lane 18:54
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Paul Ramsey 18:54
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane 18:56
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Tom Lane 19:06
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov 19:10
Re: Re: Null-safe GiST interface (proposal) 📎 Oleg Bartunov 19:33
Re: FW: [JDBC] BIGINT vs Java's long Peter Eisentraut 19:34
Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization Oleg Bartunov 19:39
Re: Client Side Connection Pooling August Zajonc 19:43
Re: FW: [JDBC] BIGINT vs Java's long Tom Lane 19:44
Re: FW: [JDBC] BIGINT vs Java's long Stephan Szabo 20:10
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Fernando Nasser 20:24
Trigger Function Question... gabriel 22:10
RE: Client Side Connection Pooling Mark Pritchard 22:50
RE: Client Side Connection Pooling August Zajonc 23:05
Re: [GENERAL] user guide Peter Eisentraut 23:11

Aug. 8, 2001

Thread Author Time
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Hiroshi Inoue 00:12
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Ian Lance Taylor 00:46
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Hiroshi Inoue 01:04
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Ian Lance Taylor 01:05
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Hiroshi Inoue 01:11
Re: [GENERAL] user guide Thomas Lockhart 01:19
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tatsuo Ishii 01:22
Re: Re: Client Side Connection Pooling Doug McNaught 03:25
RE: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 12:46
Re: Question about todo item Tom Lane 13:45
Re: Question about todo item Jan Wieck 13:47
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Ian Lance Taylor 14:42
Re: Re: Null-safe GiST interface (proposal) Bruce Momjian 15:19
Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" Bruce Momjian 15:20
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Tom Lane 16:29
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 16:39
Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs Tom Lane 16:41
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal mlw 17:19
postgresql cluster? Bruno.White 17:38
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Jan Wieck 18:00
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier 18:07
Bug with ALTER TABLE Ashley Clark 18:48
Re: Bug with ALTER TABLE Ashley Clark 18:53
Re: [GENERAL] Bug with ALTER TABLE Bruce Momjian 19:21
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing 20:19
Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane 21:27
Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane 21:29
Re: Re: [GENERAL] Bug with ALTER TABLE Tom Lane 21:41
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Tom Lane 21:49
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Paul Ramsey 21:50
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions Bruce Momjian 21:58

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31