Heed lock protocol in DROP OWNED BY
authorAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Wed, 6 May 2020 16:29:41 +0000 (12:29 -0400)
committerAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Wed, 6 May 2020 16:29:41 +0000 (12:29 -0400)
We were acquiring object locks then deleting objects one by one, instead
of acquiring all object locks first, ignoring those that did not exist,
and then deleting all objects together.   The latter is the correct
protocol to use, and what this commits changes to code to do.  Failing
to follow that leads to "cache lookup failed for relation XYZ" error
reports when DROP OWNED runs concurrently with other DDL -- for example,
a session termination that removes some temp tables.

Author: Álvaro Herrera
Reported-by: Mithun Chicklore Yogendra (Mithun CY)
Reviewed-by: Ahsan Hadi, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADq3xVZTbzK4ZLKq+dn_vB4QafXXbmMgDP3trY-GuLnib2Ai1w@mail.gmail.com

src/backend/catalog/dependency.c
src/backend/catalog/pg_shdepend.c
src/include/catalog/dependency.h

index 6e1289c7ee83e4e435568041110be0c31b15735f..fa9e11cde3cc80b3a179a7622eb536c57df1cd08 100644 (file)
@@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static void reportDependentObjects(const ObjectAddresses *targetObjects,
 static void deleteOneObject(const ObjectAddress *object,
                Relation *depRel, int32 flags);
 static void doDeletion(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags);
-static void AcquireDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags);
-static void ReleaseDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object);
 static bool find_expr_references_walker(Node *node,
                            find_expr_references_context *context);
 static void eliminate_duplicate_dependencies(ObjectAddresses *addrs);
@@ -1279,11 +1277,14 @@ doDeletion(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags)
 /*
  * AcquireDeletionLock - acquire a suitable lock for deleting an object
  *
+ * Accepts the same flags as performDeletion (though currently only
+ * PERFORM_DELETION_CONCURRENTLY does anything).
+ *
  * We use LockRelation for relations, LockDatabaseObject for everything
- * else.  Note that dependency.c is not concerned with deleting any kind of
- * shared-across-databases object, so we have no need for LockSharedObject.
+ * else.  Shared-across-databases objects are not currently supported
+ * because no caller cares, but could be modified to use LockSharedObject.
  */
-static void
+void
 AcquireDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags)
 {
    if (object->classId == RelationRelationId)
@@ -1309,8 +1310,10 @@ AcquireDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags)
 
 /*
  * ReleaseDeletionLock - release an object deletion lock
+ *
+ * Companion to AcquireDeletionLock.
  */
-static void
+void
 ReleaseDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object)
 {
    if (object->classId == RelationRelationId)
index c3cce67a8b64a494aae6c12571be96b4ca3c8606..eed74b755b447807cfa258a6ea61e4c0383df33f 100644 (file)
@@ -1248,7 +1248,10 @@ shdepDropOwned(List *roleids, DropBehavior behavior)
                                            sdepForm->objid);
                    break;
                case SHARED_DEPENDENCY_POLICY:
-                   /* If unable to remove role from policy, remove policy. */
+                   /*
+                    * Try to remove role from policy; if unable to, remove
+                    * policy.
+                    */
                    if (!RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy(roleid,
                                                    sdepForm->classid,
                                                    sdepForm->objid))
@@ -1256,6 +1259,18 @@ shdepDropOwned(List *roleids, DropBehavior behavior)
                        obj.classId = sdepForm->classid;
                        obj.objectId = sdepForm->objid;
                        obj.objectSubId = sdepForm->objsubid;
+                       /*
+                        * Acquire lock on object, then verify this dependency
+                        * is still relevant.  If not, the object might have
+                        * been dropped or the policy modified.  Ignore the
+                        * object in that case.
+                        */
+                       AcquireDeletionLock(&obj, 0);
+                       if (!systable_recheck_tuple(scan, tuple))
+                       {
+                           ReleaseDeletionLock(&obj);
+                           break;
+                       }
                        add_exact_object_address(&obj, deleteobjs);
                    }
                    break;
@@ -1266,6 +1281,13 @@ shdepDropOwned(List *roleids, DropBehavior behavior)
                        obj.classId = sdepForm->classid;
                        obj.objectId = sdepForm->objid;
                        obj.objectSubId = sdepForm->objsubid;
+                       /* as above */
+                       AcquireDeletionLock(&obj, 0);
+                       if (!systable_recheck_tuple(scan, tuple))
+                       {
+                           ReleaseDeletionLock(&obj);
+                           break;
+                       }
                        add_exact_object_address(&obj, deleteobjs);
                    }
                    break;
index fbcf9044325d44965ae65999f47bb7c0a8ae7d0b..a690eac41c54fcaba5fe88bcce054b0d7b1a0fcf 100644 (file)
@@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ typedef enum ObjectClass
 #define PERFORM_DELETION_INTERNAL          0x0001
 #define PERFORM_DELETION_CONCURRENTLY      0x0002
 
+extern void AcquireDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags);
+
+extern void ReleaseDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object);
+
 extern void performDeletion(const ObjectAddress *object,
                DropBehavior behavior, int flags);