Fix failure in WHERE CURRENT OF after rewinding the referenced cursor.
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sun, 23 Sep 2018 20:05:45 +0000 (16:05 -0400)
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sun, 23 Sep 2018 20:05:45 +0000 (16:05 -0400)
In a case where we have multiple relation-scan nodes in a cursor plan,
such as a scan of an inheritance tree, it's possible to fetch from a
given scan node, then rewind the cursor and fetch some row from an
earlier scan node.  In such a case, execCurrent.c mistakenly thought
that the later scan node was still active, because ExecReScan hadn't
done anything to make it look not-active.  We'd get some sort of
failure in the case of a SeqScan node, because the node's scan tuple
slot would be pointing at a HeapTuple whose t_self gets reset to
invalid by heapam.c.  But it seems possible that for other relation
scan node types we'd actually return a valid tuple TID to the caller,
resulting in updating or deleting a tuple that shouldn't have been
considered current.  To fix, forcibly clear the ScanTupleSlot in
ExecScanReScan.

Another issue here, which seems only latent at the moment but could
easily become a live bug in future, is that rewinding a cursor does
not necessarily lead to *immediately* applying ExecReScan to every
scan-level node in the plan tree.  Upper-level nodes will think that
they can postpone that call if their child node is already marked
with chgParam flags.  I don't see a way for that to happen today in
a plan tree that's simple enough for execCurrent.c's search_plan_tree
to understand, but that's one heck of a fragile assumption.  So, add
some logic in search_plan_tree to detect chgParam flags being set on
nodes that it descended to/through, and assume that that means we
should consider lower scan nodes to be logically reset even if their
ReScan call hasn't actually happened yet.

Per bug #15395 from Matvey Arye.  This has been broken for a long time,
so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153764171023.14986.280404050547008575@wrigleys.postgresql.org

src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c
src/backend/executor/execScan.c
src/test/regress/expected/portals.out
src/test/regress/sql/portals.sql

index f70e54fe2af1ec832909544d4842df64440cef1e..7480cf50ad0382fdc6ec1394c1cccb7e86a6cfa4 100644 (file)
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
 
 
 static char *fetch_cursor_param_value(ExprContext *econtext, int paramId);
-static ScanState *search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid);
+static ScanState *search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid,
+                bool *pending_rescan);
 
 
 /*
@@ -156,8 +157,10 @@ execCurrentOf(CurrentOfExpr *cexpr,
         * aggregation.
         */
        ScanState  *scanstate;
+       bool        pending_rescan = false;
 
-       scanstate = search_plan_tree(queryDesc->planstate, table_oid);
+       scanstate = search_plan_tree(queryDesc->planstate, table_oid,
+                                    &pending_rescan);
        if (!scanstate)
            ereport(ERROR,
                    (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_CURSOR_STATE),
@@ -177,8 +180,12 @@ execCurrentOf(CurrentOfExpr *cexpr,
                     errmsg("cursor \"%s\" is not positioned on a row",
                            cursor_name)));
 
-       /* Now OK to return false if we found an inactive scan */
-       if (TupIsNull(scanstate->ss_ScanTupleSlot))
+       /*
+        * Now OK to return false if we found an inactive scan.  It is
+        * inactive either if it's not positioned on a row, or there's a
+        * rescan pending for it.
+        */
+       if (TupIsNull(scanstate->ss_ScanTupleSlot) || pending_rescan)
            return false;
 
        /*
@@ -291,10 +298,20 @@ fetch_cursor_param_value(ExprContext *econtext, int paramId)
  *
  * Search through a PlanState tree for a scan node on the specified table.
  * Return NULL if not found or multiple candidates.
+ *
+ * If a candidate is found, set *pending_rescan to true if that candidate
+ * or any node above it has a pending rescan action, i.e. chgParam != NULL.
+ * That indicates that we shouldn't consider the node to be positioned on a
+ * valid tuple, even if its own state would indicate that it is.  (Caller
+ * must initialize *pending_rescan to false, and should not trust its state
+ * if multiple candidates are found.)
  */
 static ScanState *
-search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
+search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid,
+                bool *pending_rescan)
 {
+   ScanState  *result = NULL;
+
    if (node == NULL)
        return NULL;
    switch (nodeTag(node))
@@ -314,7 +331,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
                ScanState  *sstate = (ScanState *) node;
 
                if (RelationGetRelid(sstate->ss_currentRelation) == table_oid)
-                   return sstate;
+                   result = sstate;
                break;
            }
 
@@ -325,13 +342,13 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
        case T_AppendState:
            {
                AppendState *astate = (AppendState *) node;
-               ScanState  *result = NULL;
                int         i;
 
                for (i = 0; i < astate->as_nplans; i++)
                {
                    ScanState  *elem = search_plan_tree(astate->appendplans[i],
-                                                       table_oid);
+                                                       table_oid,
+                                                       pending_rescan);
 
                    if (!elem)
                        continue;
@@ -339,7 +356,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
                        return NULL;    /* multiple matches */
                    result = elem;
                }
-               return result;
+               break;
            }
 
            /*
@@ -348,13 +365,13 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
        case T_MergeAppendState:
            {
                MergeAppendState *mstate = (MergeAppendState *) node;
-               ScanState  *result = NULL;
                int         i;
 
                for (i = 0; i < mstate->ms_nplans; i++)
                {
                    ScanState  *elem = search_plan_tree(mstate->mergeplans[i],
-                                                       table_oid);
+                                                       table_oid,
+                                                       pending_rescan);
 
                    if (!elem)
                        continue;
@@ -362,7 +379,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
                        return NULL;    /* multiple matches */
                    result = elem;
                }
-               return result;
+               break;
            }
 
            /*
@@ -371,18 +388,31 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
             */
        case T_ResultState:
        case T_LimitState:
-           return search_plan_tree(node->lefttree, table_oid);
+           result = search_plan_tree(node->lefttree,
+                                     table_oid,
+                                     pending_rescan);
+           break;
 
            /*
             * SubqueryScan too, but it keeps the child in a different place
             */
        case T_SubqueryScanState:
-           return search_plan_tree(((SubqueryScanState *) node)->subplan,
-                                   table_oid);
+           result = search_plan_tree(((SubqueryScanState *) node)->subplan,
+                                     table_oid,
+                                     pending_rescan);
+           break;
 
        default:
            /* Otherwise, assume we can't descend through it */
            break;
    }
-   return NULL;
+
+   /*
+    * If we found a candidate at or below this node, then this node's
+    * chgParam indicates a pending rescan that will affect the candidate.
+    */
+   if (result && node->chgParam != NULL)
+       *pending_rescan = true;
+
+   return result;
 }
index caf91730ce1005fb8439b85820e2ed73dcfa84f1..f84a3fb0dbc8aca182d3a1299874f24d2f50b4fc 100644 (file)
@@ -263,6 +263,12 @@ ExecScanReScan(ScanState *node)
 {
    EState     *estate = node->ps.state;
 
+   /*
+    * We must clear the scan tuple so that observers (e.g., execCurrent.c)
+    * can tell that this plan node is not positioned on a tuple.
+    */
+   ExecClearTuple(node->ss_ScanTupleSlot);
+
    /* Rescan EvalPlanQual tuple if we're inside an EvalPlanQual recheck */
    if (estate->es_epqScanDone != NULL)
    {
index 048b2fc3e3a0d064fca7cc075fd7c7ce2e955368..dc0d2ef7dd81f9756f30205b21bd4a073fb9a5c7 100644 (file)
@@ -1269,6 +1269,76 @@ SELECT stringu1 FROM onek WHERE stringu1 = 'DZAAAA';
 ----------
 (0 rows)
 
+ROLLBACK;
+-- Check behavior with rewinding to a previous child scan node,
+-- as per bug #15395
+BEGIN;
+CREATE TABLE current_check (currentid int, payload text);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_1 () INHERITS (current_check);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_2 () INHERITS (current_check);
+INSERT INTO current_check_1 SELECT i, 'p' || i FROM generate_series(1,9) i;
+INSERT INTO current_check_2 SELECT i, 'P' || i FROM generate_series(10,19) i;
+DECLARE c1 SCROLL CURSOR FOR SELECT * FROM current_check;
+-- This tests the fetch-backwards code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 12 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+        12 | P12
+(1 row)
+
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 8 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         8 | p8
+(1 row)
+
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         8 | p8
+(1 row)
+
+-- This tests the ExecutorRewind code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 13 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+        13 | P13
+(1 row)
+
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 1 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         1 | p1
+(1 row)
+
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         1 | p1
+(1 row)
+
+SELECT * FROM current_check;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         2 | p2
+         3 | p3
+         4 | p4
+         5 | p5
+         6 | p6
+         7 | p7
+         9 | p9
+        10 | P10
+        11 | P11
+        12 | P12
+        13 | P13
+        14 | P14
+        15 | P15
+        16 | P16
+        17 | P17
+        18 | P18
+        19 | P19
+(17 rows)
+
 ROLLBACK;
 -- Make sure snapshot management works okay, per bug report in
 -- 235395b90909301035v7228ce63q392931f15aa74b31@mail.gmail.com
index d1a589094eadefbce03203596aad7add81f80d42..52560ac027516842c73ec524988ea0f0b4e79a13 100644 (file)
@@ -472,6 +472,30 @@ DELETE FROM onek WHERE CURRENT OF c1;
 SELECT stringu1 FROM onek WHERE stringu1 = 'DZAAAA';
 ROLLBACK;
 
+-- Check behavior with rewinding to a previous child scan node,
+-- as per bug #15395
+BEGIN;
+CREATE TABLE current_check (currentid int, payload text);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_1 () INHERITS (current_check);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_2 () INHERITS (current_check);
+INSERT INTO current_check_1 SELECT i, 'p' || i FROM generate_series(1,9) i;
+INSERT INTO current_check_2 SELECT i, 'P' || i FROM generate_series(10,19) i;
+
+DECLARE c1 SCROLL CURSOR FOR SELECT * FROM current_check;
+
+-- This tests the fetch-backwards code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 12 FROM c1;
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 8 FROM c1;
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+
+-- This tests the ExecutorRewind code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 13 FROM c1;
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 1 FROM c1;
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+
+SELECT * FROM current_check;
+ROLLBACK;
+
 -- Make sure snapshot management works okay, per bug report in
 -- 235395b90909301035v7228ce63q392931f15aa74b31@mail.gmail.com
 BEGIN;