Fix use-after-release mistake in currtid() and currtid2() for views
authorMichael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Mon, 1 Jun 2020 05:41:18 +0000 (14:41 +0900)
committerMichael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Mon, 1 Jun 2020 05:41:18 +0000 (14:41 +0900)
This issue has been present since the introduction of this code as of
a3519a2 from 2002, and has been found by buildfarm member prion that
uses RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE via the tests introduced recently in
e786be5.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200601022055.GB4121@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 9.5

src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c

index cc699ee2f422d495fe789bf7a61774dc99c4c953..509a0fdffcd6b8528f803cdbe7eca1c90fc6cda8 100644 (file)
@@ -338,8 +338,13 @@ currtid_for_view(Relation viewrel, ItemPointer tid)
                                        rte = rt_fetch(var->varno, query->rtable);
                                        if (rte)
                                        {
+                                               Datum           result;
+
+                                               result = DirectFunctionCall2(currtid_byreloid,
+                                                                                                        ObjectIdGetDatum(rte->relid),
+                                                                                                        PointerGetDatum(tid));
                                                table_close(viewrel, AccessShareLock);
-                                               return DirectFunctionCall2(currtid_byreloid, ObjectIdGetDatum(rte->relid), PointerGetDatum(tid));
+                                               return result;
                                        }
                                }
                        }