Actually, instead of whining about how type internal might not safely store
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:09:52 +0000 (02:09 +0000)
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:09:52 +0000 (02:09 +0000)
commitea8172ce75fbd9c815086295c974734fa0aef124
tree17f23802bf12d7d17d0da6b748f601c3b8b3f166
parent1559d6fd57b27ece90ccdb7671aac651c25f0e93
Actually, instead of whining about how type internal might not safely store
a pointer, why don't we just fix that.  Every known use of "internal" really
means a pointer anyway.
src/backend/utils/adt/array_userfuncs.c
src/bin/initdb/initdb.c
src/include/catalog/catversion.h
src/include/catalog/pg_type.h