Per Phil Sorber, though I didn't use his wording exactly.
This coding assumes the <literal>unique_violation</> error is caused by
the <command>INSERT</>, and not by, say, an <command>INSERT</> in a
- trigger function on the table. More safety could be had by using the
+ trigger function on the table. It might also misbehave if there is
+ more than one unique index on the table, since it will retry the
+ operation regardless of which index caused the error.
+ More safety could be had by using the
features discussed next to check that the trapped error was the one
expected.
</para>