Remove obsolete comment

The idea to use a union in the definition of RangeTblEntry is clearly
not being pursued.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4b27fc50-8cd6-46f5-ab20-88dbaadca645@eisentraut.org

diff --git a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
index 9b709f03908e8e666ffd39578b6162475df862f2..9b39aaa9aaca37c9f2a47f4c65c4a186943b3465 100644 (file)
--- a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
+++ b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
@@ -1029,12 +1029,6 @@ typedef struct RangeTblEntry
 
    RTEKind     rtekind;        /* see above */
 
-   /*
-    * XXX the fields applicable to only some rte kinds should be merged into
-    * a union.  I didn't do this yet because the diffs would impact a lot of
-    * code that is being actively worked on.  FIXME someday.
-    */
-
    /*
     * Fields valid for a plain relation RTE (else zero):
     *