Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer should
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:17:43 +0000 (18:17 +0000)
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:17:43 +0000 (18:17 +0000)
commit1b2bb33a54a8008bd86a5f7b7ecbada95744eb61
treee70b6f0cd5b68a91dee3c35787743e32f5822473
parentcd331e4b845f9206aa89e4f31bb75a040fef87ba
Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer should
try to protect an already-existing buffer from being evicted.  This was
left as an open issue when the posix_fadvise patch was committed.  I'm
not sure there's any evidence to justify more work in this area, but we
should have some record about it in the source code.
src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c