From 7273945cafa7a068ca2bcc617df1be1c7404de87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:27:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] pg_resetwal: Update an obsolete comment The comment claimed that pg_resetwal updates the pg_control file if it is of an old version. This has apparently never been true. Also, in c3c09be34b, another comment was added elsewhere that this currently does not happen. So this comment is wrong and redundant and can be removed. Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0f3ab4a1-ae80-56e8-3426-6b4a02507687@eisentraut.org --- src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c b/src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c index 25ecdaaa15..b7885e34f3 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c +++ b/src/bin/pg_resetwal/pg_resetwal.c @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ * * The theory of operation is fairly simple: * 1. Read the existing pg_control (which will include the last - * checkpoint record). If it is an old format then update to - * current format. + * checkpoint record). * 2. If pg_control is corrupt, attempt to intuit reasonable values, * by scanning the old xlog if necessary. * 3. Modify pg_control to reflect a "shutdown" state with a checkpoint -- 2.39.5