In walreceiver, set the publisher's relevant GUCs (datestyle,
intervalstyle, extra_float_digits) to the same values that pg_dump uses,
and for the same reason: we need the output to be read the same way
regardless of the receiver's settings. Without this, it's possible
for subscribers to misinterpret transmitted values.
Although this is clearly a bug fix, it's not without downsides:
subscribers that are storing values into some other datatype, such as
text, could get different results than before, and perhaps be unhappy
about that. Given the lack of previous complaints, it seems best
to change this only in HEAD, and to call it out as an incompatible
change in v15.
Japin Li, per report from Sadhuprasad Patro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFF0-CF=D7pc6st-3A9f1JnOt0qmc+BcBPVzD6fLYisKyAjkGA@mail.gmail.com
{
WalReceiverConn *conn;
PostgresPollingStatusType status;
- const char *keys[5];
- const char *vals[5];
+ const char *keys[6];
+ const char *vals[6];
int i = 0;
/*
vals[i] = appname;
if (logical)
{
+ /* Tell the publisher to translate to our encoding */
keys[++i] = "client_encoding";
vals[i] = GetDatabaseEncodingName();
+
+ /*
+ * Force assorted GUC parameters to settings that ensure that the
+ * publisher will output data values in a form that is unambiguous to
+ * the subscriber. (We don't want to modify the subscriber's GUC
+ * settings, since that might surprise user-defined code running in
+ * the subscriber, such as triggers.) This should match what pg_dump
+ * does.
+ */
+ keys[++i] = "options";
+ vals[i] = "-c datestyle=ISO -c intervalstyle=postgres -c extra_float_digits=3";
}
keys[++i] = NULL;
vals[i] = NULL;