SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
PL/Tcl. The others seem fairly innocuous, but worth fixing.
Back-patch to all supported branches. Before v15, this is just adding
SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER to SPI_result_code_string(), which is unlikely to
be seen by anyone, but seems worth doing for completeness.
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUg8V%2BK%2BGcafOPqymxk84Y_prXgfe64PDoopjLFH6Z0Aw%40mail.gmail.com
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUMe%2B_KedPMM9AxKqm%3DSZogSxjUcrMe%2BsakusZh3BFcQw%40mail.gmail.com
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><symbol>SPI_OK_MERGE</symbol></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ if a <command>MERGE</command> was executed
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
<varlistentry>
<term><symbol>SPI_OK_INSERT_RETURNING</symbol></term>
<listitem>
return "SPI_OK_REL_REGISTER";
case SPI_OK_REL_UNREGISTER:
return "SPI_OK_REL_UNREGISTER";
+ case SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER:
+ return "SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER";
+ case SPI_OK_MERGE:
+ return "SPI_OK_MERGE";
}
/* Unrecognized code ... return something useful ... */
sprintf(buf, "Unrecognized SPI code %d", code);
case SPI_OK_INSERT:
case SPI_OK_DELETE:
case SPI_OK_UPDATE:
+ case SPI_OK_MERGE:
Tcl_SetObjResult(interp, Tcl_NewWideIntObj(ntuples));
break;