Two cases violated list APIs by throwing away the return value. While
the code was technically correct, it relied on internal knowledge of
the list implementation, and the code wasn't really gaining anything
that way. It is planned to make this a compiler warning in the
future, so just fix these cases by assigning the return value
properly.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/
e3753562-99cd-b65f-5aca-
687dfd1ec2fc@2ndquadrant.com
LockViewRecurse_walker((Node *) viewquery, &context);
- (void) list_delete_last(context.ancestor_views);
+ context.ancestor_views = list_delete_last(context.ancestor_views);
table_close(view, NoLock);
}
Node *col = (Node *) lfirst(lc);
List *sublist = lfirst(lc2);
- /* sublist pointer in exprsLists won't need adjustment */
- (void) lappend(sublist, col);
+ sublist = lappend(sublist, col);
}
list_free(colexprs[i]);
}