* MATERIALIZED VIEW to use parallel plans, but this is safe only because
* the command is writing into a completely new table which workers won't
* be able to see. If the workers could see the table, the fact that
- * group locking would cause them to ignore the leader's heavyweight
- * GIN page locks would make this unsafe. We'll have to fix that somehow
- * if we want to allow parallel inserts in general; updates and deletes
- * have additional problems especially around combo CIDs.)
+ * group locking would cause them to ignore the leader's heavyweight GIN
+ * page locks would make this unsafe. We'll have to fix that somehow if
+ * we want to allow parallel inserts in general; updates and deletes have
+ * additional problems especially around combo CIDs.)
*
* For now, we don't try to use parallel mode if we're running inside a
* parallel worker. We might eventually be able to relax this