From c0b74323dc7b47644f074cf98597723ca55b2309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Paquier Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:20:30 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT for max_parallel_maintenance_workers max_parallel_maintenance_workers has been introduced in 9da0cc35284b, and used a hardcoded limit of 1024 rather than this variable. max_parallel_workers and max_parallel_workers_per_gather already used MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT (1024) as their upper-bound since 6599c9ac3340. Author: Matthias van de Meent Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WiCiJD+8Wig_wGPyn4vgdPjbnYXy2Rw+9KYi6izTMuP=w@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c index 686309db58..2c4cc8cd41 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c @@ -3463,7 +3463,7 @@ struct config_int ConfigureNamesInt[] = NULL }, &max_parallel_maintenance_workers, - 2, 0, 1024, + 2, 0, MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT, NULL, NULL, NULL }, -- 2.39.5