When VACUUM determines that an existing MultiXact should use a freeze
plan that sets xmax to InvalidTransactionId, the original Multi may or
may not be before OldestMxact. Remove an incorrect assertion that
expected it to always be from before OldestMxact.
Oversight in commit 4ce3af.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB5866B24104FD80B5D7E65C3EF5ED9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* it'll leave nothing in xmax (neither an Xid nor a MultiXactId).
*/
Assert(flags & FRM_INVALIDATE_XMAX);
- Assert(MultiXactIdPrecedes(xid, cutoffs->OldestMxact));
Assert(!TransactionIdIsValid(newxmax));
/* Will set t_infomask/t_infomask2 flags in freeze plan below */