Since
6bc8ef0b, InitializeMaxBackends() has used max_worker_processes
instead of adapting MaxBackends to the number of background workers
registered by modules loaded in shared_preload_libraries (at this time,
bgworkers were only static, but gained dynamic capabilities as a matter
of supporting parallel queries meaning that a control cap was
necessary).
Some comments referred to the past registration logic, making them
confusing and incorrect, so fix these.
Some of the out-of-core modules that could be loaded in this path
sometimes like to manipulate dynamically some of the resource-related
GUCs for their own needs, this commit adds a note about that.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
20220127181815.GA551692@nathanxps13
LocalProcessControlFile(false);
/*
- * Register the apply launcher. Since it registers a background worker,
- * it needs to be called before InitializeMaxBackends(), and it's probably
- * a good idea to call it before any modules had chance to take the
- * background worker slots.
+ * Register the apply launcher. It's probably a good idea to call this
+ * before any modules had a chance to take the background worker slots.
*/
ApplyLauncherRegister();
#endif
/*
- * Now that loadable modules have had their chance to register background
- * workers, calculate MaxBackends.
+ * Now that loadable modules have had their chance to alter any GUCs,
+ * calculate MaxBackends.
*/
InitializeMaxBackends();
/*
* Initialize MaxBackends value from config options.
*
- * This must be called after modules have had the chance to register background
- * workers in shared_preload_libraries, and before shared memory size is
- * determined.
+ * This must be called after modules have had the chance to alter GUCs in
+ * shared_preload_libraries and before shared memory size is determined.
*
* Note that in EXEC_BACKEND environment, the value is passed down from
* postmaster to subprocesses via BackendParameters in SubPostmasterMain; only