From 31380bc7c204e7cfa9c9e1c62947909e2b38577c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:41:28 +0300
Subject: Spell "partitionwise" consistently.

I'm not sure which spelling is better, "partitionwise" or "partition-wise",
but everywhere else we spell it "partitionwise", so be consistent.

Tatsuro Yamada reported the one in README, I found the other one with grep.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d25ebf36-5a6d-8b2c-1ff3-d6f022a56000@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
 src/backend/optimizer/README | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src')

diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/README b/src/backend/optimizer/README
index 15af9ceff53..0db3d36208d 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/README
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/README
@@ -1106,8 +1106,8 @@ PartitionSchemeData object.  This reduces memory consumed by
 PartitionSchemeData objects and makes it easy to compare the partition schemes
 of joining relations.
 
-Partition-wise aggregates/grouping
-----------------------------------
+Partitionwise aggregates/grouping
+---------------------------------
 
 If the GROUP BY clause has contains all of the partition keys, all the rows
 that belong to a given group must come from a single partition; therefore,
-- 
cgit v1.2.3