From 45b7abe59e9485657ac9380f35d2d917dd0da25b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lane
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:41:53 -0400
Subject: Fix bogus %name-prefix option syntax in all our Bison files.

%name-prefix doesn't use an "=" sign according to the Bison docs, but it
silently accepted one anyway, until Bison 3.0.  This was originally a
typo of mine in commit 012abebab1bc72043f3f670bf32e91ae4ee04bd2, and we
seem to have slavishly copied the error into all the other grammar files.

Per report from Vik Fearing; analysis by Peter Eisentraut.

Back-patch to all active branches, since somebody might try to build
a back branch with up-to-date tools.
---
 src/backend/replication/repl_gram.y | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/backend/replication')

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/repl_gram.y b/src/backend/replication/repl_gram.y
index 154aaace9f5..f369da3024b 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/repl_gram.y
+++ b/src/backend/replication/repl_gram.y
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Node *replication_parse_result;
 %}
 
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix="replication_yy"
+%name-prefix "replication_yy"
 
 %union {
 		char					*str;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3