From 01930cea035d4fd9e490a2d1159b26fbd2f43ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:20:54 +0000 Subject: Add TODO: * Consider whether duplicate keys should be sorted by block/offset http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg00558.php Create new "Sorting" TODO section. --- doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/src') diff --git a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html index 825bb888505..844dc553ddd 100644 --- a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html +++ b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us)
-Last updated: Wed Jun 18 21:15:40 EDT 2008
+Last updated: Mon Jun 23 16:20:35 EDT 2008
The most recent version of this document can be viewed at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html.
@@ -1203,7 +1203,24 @@ first. There is also a developer's wiki at
This would be beneficial when there are few distinct values. This is + already used by GROUP BY. +
+http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg00558.php +
+http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg01101.php + http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00045.php +
+http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00541.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00562.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00873.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00035.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00771.php -
-This would be beneficial when there are few distinct values. This is - already used by GROUP BY.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00450.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-06/msg00340.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg01119.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-07/msg00439.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-09/msg00206.php
@@ -1616,11 +1628,6 @@ first. There is also a developer's wiki at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-09/msg00895.php -
-http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg01101.php - http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00045.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg02238.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-10/msg00048.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/msg00040.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg01213.php
@@ -1749,7 +1755,7 @@ first. There is also a developer's wiki at
of result sets using new statement protocol
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00893.php