| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Déjà vu of commit fc40ba1296a7, for another backslash command.
Strictly speaking this isn't a bug, but since all references to catalog
objects are schema-qualified, we might as well be consistent. The
omission first appeared in commit ad600bba0422 and replicated in
a4d75c86bf15; backpatch to 14.
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzbyj@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210827193151.GN26465@telsasoft.com
|
|
Strictly speaking this isn't a bug, but since all references to catalog
objects are schema-qualified, we might as well be consistent. The
omission first appeared in commit 1c5d9270e339, so backpatch to 12.
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzbyj@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210827193151.GN26465@telsasoft.com
|
|
If the system crashed between CREATE TABLESPACE and the next checkpoint,
the result could be some files in the tablespace unexpectedly containing
no rows. Affected files would be those for which the system did not
write WAL; see the wal_skip_threshold documentation. Before v13, a
different set of conditions governed the writing of WAL; see v12's
<sect2 id="populate-pitr">. (The v12 conditions were broader in some
ways and narrower in others.) Users may want to audit non-default
tablespaces for unexpected short files. The bug could have truncated an
index without affecting the associated table, and reindexing the index
would fix that particular problem.
This fixes the bug by making create_tablespace_directories() more like
TablespaceCreateDbspace(). create_tablespace_directories() was
recursively removing tablespace contents, reasoning that WAL redo would
recreate everything removed that way. That assumption holds for other
wal_level values. Under wal_level=minimal, the old approach could
delete files for which no other copy existed. Back-patch to 9.6 (all
supported versions).
Reviewed by Robert Haas and Prabhat Sahu. Reported by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaLO9ncuwvr2nN-J4VEP5XyAcy=zKiHxQzBbFRxxGxm0w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Somehow, spgist overlooked the need to call pgstat_count_index_scan().
Hence, pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_scan and equivalent columns never
became nonzero for an SP-GiST index, although the related per-tuple
counters worked fine.
This fix works a bit differently from other index AMs, in that the
counter increment occurs in spgrescan not spggettuple/spggetbitmap.
It looks like this won't make the user-visible semantics noticeably
different, so I won't go to the trouble of introducing an is-this-
the-first-call flag just to make the counter bumps happen in the
same places.
Per bug #17163 from Christian Quest. Back-patch to all supported
versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17163-b8c5cc88322a5e92@postgresql.org
|
|
When prefetching pages for ANALYZE, we should be using
maintenance_io_concurrenty (by calling
get_tablespace_maintenance_io_concurrency(), not
get_tablespace_io_concurrency()).
ANALYZE prefetching was introduced in c6fc50c, so back-patch to 14.
Backpatch-through: 14
Reported-By: Egor Rogov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9beada99-34ce-8c95-fadb-451768d08c64%40postgrespro.ru
|
|
Adjust track_io_timing related logging code added by commit 94d13d474d.
Make it consistent with other nearby autovacuum and autoanalyze logging
code by removing logic that suppressed zero millisecond outputs.
log_autovacuum_min_duration log output now reliably shows "read:" and
"write:" millisecond-based values in its report (when track_io_timing is
enabled).
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznW0FNxSVQMSRazAMYNfZ6DR_gr5WE78hc6E1CBkkJpzw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, where the track_io_timing logging was introduced.
|
|
This order seems more natural. It starts with details that are
particular to heap and index data structures, and ends with system-level
costs incurred during the autovacuum worker's VACUUM/ANALYZE operation.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkzxK6ahA9xxsOftRtBX_R0swuHZsvo4QUbak1Bz7hb7Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, which enhanced the log output in various ways.
|
|
This was arguably a minor oversight in commit b4af70cb, which cleaned up
the function signatures of functions that modify IndexBulkDeleteResult
variables.
|
|
Second thoughts about commit 824bf7190: we apply makesearch() to
an NFA after having determined whether it is a MATCHALL pattern.
Prepending ".*" doesn't make it non-MATCHALL, but it does change the
maximum possible match length, and makesearch() failed to update that.
This has no ill effects given the stylized usage of search NFAs, but
it seems like it's better to keep the data structure consistent. In
particular, fixing this allows more honest handling of the MATCHALL
check in matchuntil(): we can now assert that maxmatchall is infinity,
instead of lamely assuming that it should act that way.
In passing, improve the code in dump[c]nfa so that infinite maxmatchall
is printed as "inf" not a magic number.
|
|
When looping over the resultset from a SQL query, extracting the field
number before the loop body to avoid repeated calls to PQfnumber is an
established pattern. On very wide tables this can have a performance
impact, but it wont be noticeable in the common case. This fixes a few
queries which were extracting the field number in the loop body.
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57164C392783F29F6D0ECA0B94139@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Previously, on the subscriber, we set the error context callback for the
tuple data conversion failures. This commit replaces the existing error
context callback with a comprehensive one so that it shows not only the
details of data conversion failures but also the details of logical change
being applied by the apply worker or table sync worker. The additional
information displayed will be the command, transaction id, and timestamp.
The error context is added to an error only when applying a change but not
while doing other work like receiving data etc.
This will help users in diagnosing the problems that occur during logical
replication. It also can be used for future work that allows skipping a
particular transaction on the subscriber.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Greg Nancarrow, Haiying Tang, Amit Kapila
Tested-by: Haiying Tang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDeScrsHhLyEPYqN3sydg6PxAPVBboK=30xJfUVihNZDA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The former limit was perhaps a carryover from an older hand-coded
table. Since commit bab982161 we have enough space in mbinterval to
store larger codepoints, so collect all combining characters.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/49ad1fa0-174e-c901-b14c-c484b60907f1%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
The hardcoded "wide character" set in ucs_wcwidth() was last updated
around the Unicode 5.0 era. This led to misalignment when printing
emojis and other codepoints that have since been designated
wide or full-width.
To fix and keep up to date, extend update-unicode to download the list
of wide and full-width codepoints from the offical sources.
In passing, remove some comments about non-spacing characters that
haven't been accurate since we removed the former hardcoded logic.
Jacob Champion
Reported and reviewed by Pavel Stehule
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAFj8pRCeX21O69YHxmykYySYyprZAqrKWWg0KoGKdjgqcGyygg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This reverts commit eb0d0d2c7300c9c5c22b35975c11265aa4becc84.
After I had committed eb0d0d2c7 and 78ab944cd, I decided to add
a sanity check for a "can't happen" scenario just to be cautious.
It turned out that it already happened in the official Unicode source
data, namely that a character can be both wide and a combining
character. This fact renders the aforementioned commits unnecessary,
so revert both of them.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsH5ejH4-1xaTLpSK8vWoK1m6fA1JBtTM6jmBsLfmDki1g%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
This reverts commit 78ab944cd4b9977732becd9d0bc83223b88af9a2.
After I had committed eb0d0d2c7 and 78ab944cd, I decided to add
a sanity check for a "can't happen" scenario just to be cautious.
It turned out that it already happened in the official Unicode source
data, namely that a character can be both wide and a combining
character. This fact renders the aforementioned commits unnecessary,
so revert both of them.
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsH5ejH4-1xaTLpSK8vWoK1m6fA1JBtTM6jmBsLfmDki1g%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Since a partitioned index doesn't have storage, getting the number of
blocks from it will not give sensible results. Existing callers
already check that they don't call it that way, so there doesn't
appear to be a live problem. But for correctness, handle
RELKIND_PARTITIONED_INDEX together with the other non-storage
relkinds.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1d3a5fbe-f48b-8bea-80da-9a5c4244aef9@enterprisedb.com
|
|
Add a width field to mbinterval and have mbbisearch return a
pointer to the found range rather than just bool for success.
A future commit will add another width besides zero, and this
will allow that to use the same search.
Reviewed by Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsGOCpzV7c-f3a8ADsA1n4uZ%3D8puCctQp%2Bx7W0vgkv%3Dw%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
No functional changes. A future commit will use this table for
other purposes besides combining characters.
|
|
The condition "context_start < context_end" is strictly weaker
than "context_end - context_start >= 50", so we don't need both.
Oversight in commit ffd3944ab, noted by tanghy.fnst.
In passing, line-wrap a nearby test to make it more readable.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB61137C4054774F44E3A9DC89FBC69@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Pengchengliu reported an assertion failure in a parallel woker while
performing a parallel scan using an overflowed snapshot. The proximate
cause is that TransactionXmin was set to an incorrect value. The
underlying cause is incorrect snapshot handling in parallel.c.
In particular, InitializeParallelDSM() was unconditionally calling
GetTransactionSnapshot(), because I (rhaas) mistakenly thought that
was always retrieving an existing snapshot whereas, at isolation
levels less than REPEATABLE READ, it's actually taking a new one. So
instead do this only at higher isolation levels where there actually
is a single snapshot for the whole transaction.
By itself, this is not a sufficient fix, because we still need to
guarantee that TransactionXmin gets set properly in the workers. The
easiest way to do that seems to be to install the leader's active
snapshot as the transaction snapshot if the leader did not serialize a
transaction snapshot. This doesn't affect the results of future
GetTrasnactionSnapshot() calls since those have to take a new snapshot
anyway; what we care about is the side effect of setting TransactionXmin.
Report by Pengchengliu. Patch by Greg Nancarrow, except for some comment
text which I supplied.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/002f01d748ac$eaa781a0$bff684e0$@tju.edu.cn
|
|
The previous coding relied on the PID file appearing and the query
starting "fast enough", which can fail on slow machines. Also, there
might have been an undocumented interference between alarm and
IPC::Run. This new coding doesn't rely on any of these concurrency
mechanisms. Instead, we wait unitl the PID file is complete before
proceeding, and then also wait until the sleep query is registered by
the server.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E1mH14Q-0002gh-HS%40gemulon.postgresql.org
|
|
|
|
The same condition was repeated twice when comparing the connection used
by existing declared statement with the one coming from a fresh DECLARE
statement. This had no consequences, but let's keep the code clean.
Oversight in f576de1.
Author: Shenhao Wang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSBPR01MB42149653BC0AB0A49D23C1B8F2C69@OSBPR01MB4214.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
Commit 325f2ec555 introduced pg_class.relwrite to skip operations on
tables created as part of a heap rewrite during DDL. It links such
transient heaps to the original relation OID via this new field in
pg_class but forgot to do anything about toast tables. So, logical
decoding was not able to skip operations on internally created toast
tables. This leads to an error when we tried to decode the WAL for the
next operation for which it appeared that there is a toast data where
actually it didn't have any toast data.
To fix this, we set pg_class.relwrite for internally created toast tables
as well which allowed skipping operations on them during logical decoding.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: David Zhang, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b5146fb1-ad9e-7d6e-f980-98ed68744a7c@amazon.com
|
|
Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Discussion: https://posgr.es/m/871r75gd0i.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
|
|
There are two identical error messages about valid value of modulus for
hash partition, in PostgreSQL source code. Commit 0e1275fb07 improved
only one of them so that ambiguous word "positive" was avoided there,
and forgot to improve the other. This commit improves the other.
Which would reduce translator burden.
Back-pach to v11 where the error message exists.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210819.170315.1413060634876301811.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
The distance in phrase operator must be an integer value between zero
and MAXENTRYPOS inclusive. But previously the error message about
its valid value included the information about its upper limit
but not lower limit (i.e., zero). This commit improves the error message
so that it also includes the information about its lower limit.
Back-patch to v9.6 where full-text phrase search was supported.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210819.170315.1413060634876301811.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
This commit improves the ecpg's error message that commit f576de1db1 updated,
so that it gets rid of trailing period and uppercases the command name
in the error message.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210819.170315.1413060634876301811.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
Regexps like "(.){0}...\1" drew an "invalid backreference number".
That's not unreasonable on its face, since the capture group will
never be matched if it's iterated zero times. However, other engines
such as Perl's don't complain about this, nor do we throw an error for
related cases such as "(.)|\1", even though that backref can never
succeed either. Also, if the zero-iterations case happens at runtime
rather than compile time --- say, "(x)*...\1" when there's no "x" to
be found --- that's not an error, we just deem the backref to not
match. Making this even less defensible, no error was thrown for
nested cases such as "((.)){0}...\2"; and to add insult to injury,
those cases could result in assertion failures instead. (It seems
that nothing especially bad happened in non-assert builds, though.)
Let's just fix it so that no error is thrown and instead the backref
is deemed to never match, so that compile-time detection of no
iterations behaves the same as run-time detection.
Per report from Mark Dilger. This appears to be an aboriginal error
in Spencer's library, so back-patch to all supported versions.
Pre-v14, it turns out to also be necessary to back-patch one aspect of
commits cb76fbd7e/00116dee5, namely to create capture-node subREs with
the begin/end states of their subexpressions, not the current lp/rp
of the outer parseqatom invocation. Otherwise delsub complains that
we're trying to disconnect a state from itself. This is a bit scary
but code examination shows that it's safe: in the pre-v14 code, if we
want to wrap iteration around the subexpression, the first thing we do
is overwrite the atom's begin/end fields with new states. So the
bogus values didn't survive long enough to be used for anything, except
if no iteration is required, in which case it doesn't matter.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A099E4A8-4377-4C64-A98C-3DEDDC075502@enterprisedb.com
|
|
The current refresh behavior tries to just refresh added/dropped
publications but that leads to removing wrong tables from subscription. We
can't refresh just the dropped publication because it is quite possible
that some of the tables are removed from publication by that time and now
those will remain as part of the subscription. Also, there is a chance
that the tables that were part of the publication being dropped are also
part of another publication, so we can't remove those.
So, we decided that by default, add/drop commands will also act like
REFRESH PUBLICATION which means they will refresh all the publications. We
can keep the old behavior for "add publication" but it is better to be
consistent with "drop publication".
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716935D4C2CC85A6143073F94EF9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
The recursion in cdissect() was careless about clearing match data
for capturing parentheses after rejecting a partial match. This
could allow a later back-reference to succeed when by rights it
should fail for lack of a defined referent.
To fix, think a little more rigorously about what the contract
between different levels of cdissect's recursion needs to be.
With the right spec, we can fix this using fewer rather than more
resets of the match data; the key decision being that a failed
sub-match is now explicitly responsible for clearing any matches
it may have set.
There are enough other cross-checks and optimizations in the code
that it's not especially easy to exhibit this problem; usually, the
match will fail as-expected. Plus, regexps that are even potentially
vulnerable are most likely user errors, since there's just not much
point in writing a back-ref that doesn't always have a referent.
These facts perhaps explain why the issue hasn't been detected,
even though it's almost certainly a couple of decades old.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151435.1629733387@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
WAL records may span multiple segments, but XLogWrite() does not
wait for the entire record to be written out to disk before
creating archive status files. Instead, as soon as the last WAL page of
the segment is written, the archive status file is created, and the
archiver may process it. If PostgreSQL crashes before it is able to
write and flush the rest of the record (in the next WAL segment), the
wrong version of the first segment file lingers in the archive, which
causes operations such as point-in-time restores to fail.
To fix this, keep track of records that span across segments and ensure
that segments are only marked ready-for-archival once such records have
been completely written to disk.
This has always been wrong, so backpatch all the way back.
Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryo Matsumura <matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CBDDFA01-6E40-46BB-9F98-9340F4379505@amazon.com
|
|
Previously, these showed unlikely default values. The new default value
128MB (since PG 10) is not always accurate since initdb tries several
increasing values, but it likely to be accurate.
Reported-by: Zhangjie <zhangjie2@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYWPR01MB7678772FD8640C404F1DC882F9079@TYWPR01MB7678.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Author: Zhangjie
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
In a backup manifest, WAL-Ranges stores the range of WAL that is
required for the backup to be valid. pg_verifybackup would then
internally use pg_waldump for the checks based on this data.
When the timeline where the backup started was more than 1 with a
history file looked at for the manifest data generation, the calculation
of the WAL range for the first timeline to check was incorrect. The
previous logic used as start LSN the start position of the first
timeline, but it needs to use the start LSN of the backup. This would
cause failures with pg_verifybackup, or any tools making use of the
backup manifests.
This commit adds a test based on a logic using a self-promoted node,
making it rather cheap.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210818.143031.1867083699202617521.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Some shells apparently don't support $PPID, so skip the test in that
case.
|
|
Per buildfarm members hoverfly and thorntail
|
|
We've supported parallel aggregation since e06a38965. At the time, we
didn't quite get around to also adding parallel DISTINCT. So, let's do
that now.
This is implemented by introducing a two-phase DISTINCT. Phase 1 is
performed on parallel workers, rows are made distinct there either by
hashing or by sort/unique. The results from the parallel workers are
combined and the final distinct phase is performed serially to get rid of
any duplicate rows that appear due to combining rows for each of the
parallel workers.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrjRxVKwQN0he79xS+9wyotFXL=RmoWqGGO2N45Farpgw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Improve two places in plpgsql, and one in spi.c, where an error
message would confusingly tell you that you couldn't use a SELECT
query, when what you had written *was* a SELECT query. The actual
problem is that you can't use SELECT ... INTO in these contexts,
but the messages failed to make that apparent. Special-case
SELECT INTO to make these errors more helpful.
Also, fix the same spots in plpgsql, as well as several messages
in exec_eval_expr(), to not quote the entire complained-of query or
expression in the primary error message. That behavior very easily
led to violating our message style guideline about keeping the primary
error message short and single-line. Also, since the important part
of the message was after the inserted text, it could make the real
problem very hard to see. We can report the query or expression as
the first line of errcontext instead.
Per complaint from Roger Mason. Back-patch to v14, since (a) some
of these messages are new in v14 and (b) v14's translatable strings
are still somewhat in flux. The problem's older than that of
course, but I'm hesitant to change the behavior further back.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1914708.1629474624@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
After detecting a sub-match "dissect" failure (i.e., a backref match
failure) in the i'th sub-match of an iteration node, we should proceed
by adjusting the attempted length of the i'th submatch. As coded,
though, these functions changed the attempted length of the *last*
sub-match, and only after exhausting all possibilities for that would
they back up to adjust the next-to-last sub-match, and then the
second-from-last, etc; all of which is wasted effort, since only
changing the start or length of the i'th sub-match can possibly make
it succeed. This oversight creates the possibility for exponentially
bad performance. Fortunately the problem is masked in most cases by
optimizations or constraints applied elsewhere; which explains why
we'd not noticed it before. But it is possible to reach the problem
with fairly simple, if contrived, regexps.
Oversight in my commit 173e29aa5. That's pretty ancient now,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1808998.1629412269@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Using --quiet in combination with --no-strict-names didn't work as
documented, a warning message was still emitted. Since the --quiet
flag was working in an unconventional way to other utilities, fix
by removing the functionality instead.
Backpatch through 14 where pg_amcheck was introduced.
Bug: 17148
Reported-by: Chen Jiaoqian <chenjq.jy@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17148-b5087318e2b04fc6@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
Query canceling in psql was accidentally broken by
3a5130672296ed4e682403a77a9a3ad3d21cef75 (since reverted), so having
some test coverage for that seems useful.
Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18c78a01-4a34-9dd4-f78b-6860f1420c8e@enterprisedb.com
|
|
Check errno after strtoul()/strtol() to handle out of range errors
better. For out of range, strtoul() returns ULONG_MAX, and the
previous code would proceed with that result.
Reported-by: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6a10a211-872b-3c4c-106b-909ae5fefa61%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
The previous code wouldn't handle higher block numbers on systems
where sizeof(long) == 4.
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6a10a211-872b-3c4c-106b-909ae5fefa61%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
transformLockingClause neglected to exclude the pseudo-RTEs for
OLD/NEW when processing a rule's query. This led to odd errors
or even crashes later on. This bug is very ancient, but it's
not terribly surprising that nobody noticed, since the use-case
for SELECT FOR UPDATE in a non-view rule is somewhere between
thin and non-existent. Still, crashing is not OK.
Per bug #17151 from Zhiyong Wu. Thanks to Masahiko Sawada
for analysis of the problem.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17151-c03a3e6e4ec9aadb@postgresql.org
|
|
Previously log messages late during shutdown could end up using either another
backend's PgBackendStatus (multi user) or segfault (single user) because
pgstat_get_my_query_id()'s check for !MyBEEntry didn't filter out use after
pgstat_beshutdown_hook().
This became a bug in 4f0b0966c86, but was a bit fishy before. But given
there's no known problematic cases before 14, it doesn't seem worth
backpatching further.
Also fixes a wrong filename in a comment, introduced in e1025044.
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Backpatch: 14-
|
|
In the code, most places used the term "Stream Stop" for the logical
stream message. This commit improves consistency by renaming LogicalRepMsgType
"LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_END" to "LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_STOP".
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDeScrsHhLyEPYqN3sydg6PxAPVBboK=30xJfUVihNZDA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This is a combined revert of the following commits:
- c3826f8, a refactoring piece that moved the hex decoding code to
src/common/. This code was cleaned up by aef8948, as it originally
included no overflow checks in the same way as the base64 routines in
src/common/ used by SCRAM, making it unsafe for its purpose.
- aef8948, a more advanced refactoring of the hex encoding/decoding code
to src/common/ that added sanity checks on the result buffer for hex
decoding and encoding. As reported by Hans Buschmann, those overflow
checks are expensive, and it is possible to see a performance drop in
the decoding/encoding of bytea or LOs the longer they are. Simple SQLs
working on large bytea values show a clear difference in perf profile.
- ccf4e27, a cleanup made possible by aef8948.
The reverts of all those commits bring back the performance of hex
decoding and encoding back to what it was in ~13. Fow now and
post-beta3, this is the simplest option.
Reported-by: Hans Buschmann
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1629039545467.80333@nidsa.net
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
Recursion into the FILTER clause was mis-implemented, such that a
relevant Var or Aggref at the very top of the FILTER clause would
be ignored. (Of course, that'd have to be a plain boolean Var or
boolean-returning aggregate.) The consequence would be
mis-identification of the correct semantic level of the aggregate,
which could lead to not-per-spec query behavior. If the FILTER
expression is an aggregate, this could also lead to failure to issue
an expected "aggregate function calls cannot be nested" error, which
would likely result in a core dump later on, since the planner and
executor aren't expecting such cases to appear.
The root cause is that commit b560ec1b0 blindly copied some code
that assumed it's recursing into a List, and thus didn't examine the
top-level node. To forestall questions about why this call doesn't
look like the others, as well as possible future copy-and-paste
mistakes, let's change all three check_agg_arguments_walker calls in
check_agg_arguments, even though only the one for the filter clause
is really broken.
Per bug #17152 from Zhiyong Wu. This has been wrong since we
implemented FILTER, so back-patch to all supported versions.
(Testing suggests that pre-v11 branches manage to avoid crashing
in the bad-Aggref case, thanks to "redundant" checks in ExecInitAgg.
But I'm not sure how thorough that protection is, and anyway the
wrong-behavior issue remains, so fix 9.6 and 10 too.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17152-c7f906cc1a88e61b@postgresql.org
|
|
The skip options set for all-visible and all-frozen were incorrect
as they used space rather than hyphen, causing a syntax error when
invoked. Also, the option for not skipping any pages at all, none,
was documented but not implemented.
Backpatch through 14 where pg_amcheck was introduced.
Bug: #17149
Reported-by: Chen Jiaoqian <chenjq.jy@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17149-5918ea748da36b15@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
If recordDependencyOnCurrentExtension is invoked on a pre-existing,
free-standing object during an extension update script, that object
will become owned by the extension. In our current code this is
possible in three cases:
* Replacing a "shell" type or operator.
* CREATE OR REPLACE overwriting an existing object.
* ALTER TYPE SET, ALTER DOMAIN SET, and ALTER OPERATOR SET.
The first of these cases is intentional behavior, as noted by the
existing comments for GenerateTypeDependencies. It seems like
appropriate behavior for CREATE OR REPLACE too; at least, the obvious
alternatives are not better. However, the fact that it happens during
ALTER is an artifact of trying to share code (GenerateTypeDependencies
and makeOperatorDependencies) between the CREATE and ALTER cases.
Since an extension script would be unlikely to ALTER an object that
didn't already belong to the extension, this behavior is not very
troubling for the direct target object ... but ALTER TYPE SET will
recurse to dependent domains, and it is very uncool for those to
become owned by the extension if they were not already.
Let's fix this by redefining the ALTER cases to never change extension
membership, full stop. We could minimize the behavioral change by
only changing the behavior when ALTER TYPE SET is recursing to a
domain, but that would complicate the code and it does not seem like
a better definition.
Per bug #17144 from Alex Kozhemyakin. Back-patch to v13 where ALTER
TYPE SET was added. (The other cases are older, but since they only
affect the directly-named object, there's not enough of a problem to
justify changing the behavior further back.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17144-e67d7a8f049de9af@postgresql.org
|
