| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This new DDL command splits a single partition into several partitions. Just
like the ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS ... command, new partitions are
created using the createPartitionTable() function with the parent partition
as the template.
This commit comprises a quite naive implementation which works in a single
process and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all
the operations, including the tuple routing. This is why the new DDL command
can't be recommended for large, partitioned tables under high load. However,
this implementation comes in handy in certain cases, even as it is. Also, it
could serve as a foundation for future implementations with less locking and
possibly parallelism.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsaker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Tachoires <stephane.tachoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <dgustafsson@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
|
|
This new DDL command merges several partitions into a single partition of the
target table. The target partition is created using the new
createPartitionTable() function with the parent partition as the template.
This commit comprises a quite naive implementation which works in a single
process and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all
the operations, including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL
command can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load.
However, this implementation comes in handy in certain cases, even as it is.
Also, it could serve as a foundation for future implementations with less
locking and possibly parallelism.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsaker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Tachoires <stephane.tachoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <dgustafsson@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
|
|
index-killtuples test depends on the contrib modules btree_gin and
btree_gist, which would not be installed in a temporary installation
with an execution of the main isolation test suite like this one:
make -C src/test/isolation/ check
src/test/isolation/ should not depend on contrib/, and EXTRA_INSTALL has
no effect in this case as this test suite uses its own Makefile rules.
This commit moves index-killtuples into its new module, called "index",
whose name looks like the best fit there can be as it depends on more
than one index AM. btree_gin and btree_gist are now pulled in the
temporary installation with EXTRA_INSTALL. The test is renamed to
"killtuples", for simplicity.
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Suggested-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aKJsWedftW7UX1WM@paquier.xyz
|
|
We don't have an official concept of temporary functions. (You can
make one explicitly in pg_temp, but then you have to explicitly
schema-qualify it on every call.) However, until now we were quite
laissez-faire about whether a non-temporary function could depend on
a temporary object, such as a temp table or view. If one does,
it will silently go away at end of session, due to the automatic
DROP ... CASCADE on the session's temporary objects. People have
complained that that's surprising; however, we can't really forbid
it because other people (including our own regression tests) rely
on being able to do it. Let's compromise by emitting a NOTICE
at CREATE FUNCTION time. This is somewhat comparable to our
ancient practice of emitting a NOTICE when forcing a view to
become temp because it depends on temp tables.
Along the way, refactor recordDependencyOnExpr() so that the
dependencies of an expression can be combined with other
dependencies, instead of being emitted separately and perhaps
duplicatively.
We should probably make the implementation of temp-by-default
views use the same infrastructure used here, but that's for
another patch. It's unclear whether there are any other object
classes that deserve similar treatment.
Author: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19cf6ae1-04cd-422c-a760-d7e75fe6cba9@uni-muenster.de
|
|
When instrumenting a MERGE command containing both WHEN NOT MATCHED BY
SOURCE and WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET actions using EXPLAIN ANALYZE, a
concurrent update of the target relation could lead to an Assert
failure in show_modifytable_info(). In a non-assert build, this would
lead to an incorrect value for "skipped" tuples in the EXPLAIN output,
rather than a crash.
This could happen if the concurrent update caused a matched row to no
longer match, in which case ExecMerge() treats the single originally
matched row as a pair of not matched rows, and potentially executes 2
not-matched actions for the single source row. This could then lead to
a state where the number of rows processed by the ModifyTable node
exceeds the number of rows produced by its source node, causing
"skipped_path" in show_modifytable_info() to be negative, triggering
the Assert.
Fix this in ExecMergeMatched() by incrementing the instrumentation
tuple count on the source node whenever a concurrent update of this
kind is detected, if both kinds of merge actions exist, so that the
number of source rows matches the number of actions potentially
executed, and the "skipped" tuple count is correct.
Back-patch to v17, where support for WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE
actions was introduced.
Bug: #19111
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19111-5b06624513d301b3@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
EvalPlanQualStart() failed to propagate es_partition_directory into
the child EState used for EPQ rechecks. When execution time partition
pruning ran during the EPQ scan, executor code dereferenced a NULL
partition directory and crashed.
Previously, propagating es_partition_directory into the EPQ EState was
unnecessary because CreatePartitionPruneState(), which sets it on
demand, also initialized the exec-pruning context. After commit
d47cbf474, CreatePartitionPruneState() now initializes only the init-
time pruning context, leaving exec-pruning context initialization to
ExecInitNode(). Since EvalPlanQualStart() runs only ExecInitNode() and
not CreatePartitionPruneState(), it can encounter a NULL
es_partition_directory. Other executor fields initialized during
CreatePartitionPruneState() are already copied into the child EState
thanks to commit 8741e48e5d, but es_partition_directory was missed.
Fix by borrowing the parent estate's es_partition_directory in
EvalPlanQualStart(), and by clearing that field in EvalPlanQualEnd()
so the parent remains responsible for freeing the directory.
Add an isolation test permutation that triggers EPQ with execution-
time partition pruning, the case that reproduces this crash.
Bug: #19078
Reported-by: Yuri Zamyatin <yuri@yrz.am>
Diagnosed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19078-dfd62f840a2c0766@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
It is possible to call pg_stat_reset_single_function_counters() for a
single function, but the reset time was missing the system view showing
its statistics. Like all the fields of pg_stat_user_functions, the GUC
track_functions needs to be enabled to show the statistics about
function executions.
Bump catalog version.
Bump PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID, as a result of the new field added to
PgStat_StatFuncEntry.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aONjnsaJSx-nEdfU@paquier.xyz
|
|
The functions test_stat_func() and test_stat_func2() had empty
function bodies, so that they took very little time to run. This made
it possible that on machines with relatively low timer resolution the
functions could return before the clock advanced, making the test fail
(as seen on buildfarm members fruitcrow and hamerkop).
To avoid that, pg_sleep for 10us during the functions. As far as we
can tell, all current hardware has clock resolution much less than
that. (The current implementation of pg_sleep will round it up to
1ms anyway, but someday that might get improved.)
Author: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/68d413a3.a70a0220.24c74c.8be9@mx.google.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
Commit bb3ec16e14 moved partition pruning metadata into PlannedStmt.
At executor startup this metadata is used to initialize the EState
fields es_part_prune_infos, es_part_prune_states, and
es_part_prune_results. EvalPlanQualStart() failed to copy those
fields into the child EState, causing NULL dereference when Append
ran partition pruning during a recheck. This can occur with DELETE
or UPDATE on partitioned tables that use runtime pruning, e.g. with
generic plans.
Fix by copying all partition pruning state into the EPQ estate.
Add an isolation test that reproduces the crash with concurrent
UPDATE and DELETE on a partitioned table, where the DELETE session
hits the crash during its EPQ recheck after the UPDATE commits.
Bug: #19056
Reported-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Diagnozed-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19056-a677cef9b54d76a0%40postgresql.org
|
|
The EvalPlanQual recheck for TID Range Scan wasn't rechecking the TID qual
still passed after following update chains. This could result in tuples
being updated or deleted by plans using TID Range Scans where the ctid of
the new (updated) tuple no longer matches the clause of the scan. This
isn't desired behavior, and isn't consistent with what would happen if the
chosen plan had used an Index or Seq Scan, and that could lead to hard to
predict behavior for scans that contain TID quals and other quals as the
planner has freedom to choose TID Range or some other non-TID scan method
for such queries, and the chosen plan could change at any moment.
Here we fix this by properly implementing the recheck function for TID
Range Scans.
Backpatch to 14, where TID Range Scans were added
Reported-by: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a6268ff-3340-453a-9bf5-c98d51a6f729@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
The EvalPlanQual recheck for TID Scan wasn't rechecking the TID qual
still passed after following update chains. This could result in tuples
being updated or deleted by plans using TID Scans where the ctid of the
new (updated) tuple no longer matches the clause of the scan. This isn't
desired behavior, and isn't consistent with what would happen if the
chosen plan had used an Index or Seq Scan, and that could lead to hard to
predict behavior for scans that contain TID quals and other quals as the
planner has freedom to choose TID or some other scan method for such
queries, and the chosen plan could change at any moment.
Here we fix this by properly implementing the recheck function for TID
Scans.
Backpatch to 13, oldest supported version
Reported-by: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a6268ff-3340-453a-9bf5-c98d51a6f729@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
This commit adds an isolation test showing that temporal foreign keys do
not permit referential integrity violations under concurrency, like
fk-snapshot-2. You can show that the test fails by passing false for
detectNewRows to ri_PerformCheck in ri_restrict.
Author: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Rustam ALLAKOV <rustamallakov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUp=xja80rBaB6NpY3RRdi750y046x28bo_xg29zKY72Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit adds a missing isolation test for (non-PERIOD) foreign keys.
With REPEATABLE READ, one transaction can insert a referencing row while
another deletes the referenced row, and both see a valid state. But
after they have committed, the table violates referential integrity.
If the INSERT precedes the DELETE, we use a crosscheck snapshot to see
the just-added row, so that the DELETE can raise a foreign key error.
You can see the table violate referential integrity if you change
ri_restrict to pass false for detectNewRows to ri_PerformCheck.
A crosscheck snapshot is not needed when the DELETE comes first, because
the INSERT's trigger takes a FOR KEY SHARE lock that sees the row now
marked for deletion, waits for that transaction to commit, and raises a
serialization error. I (Paul) added a test for that too though.
We already have a similar test (in ri-triggers.spec) for SERIALIZABLE
snapshot isolation showing that you can implement foreign keys with just
pl/pgSQL, but that test does nothing to validate ri_triggers.c. We also
have tests (in fk-snapshot.spec) for other concurrency scenarios, but
not this one: we test concurrently deleting both the referencing and
referenced row, when the constraint activates a cascade/set null action.
But those tests don't exercise ri_restrict, and the consequence of
omitting a crosscheck comparison is different: a serialization failure,
not a referential integrity violation.
Author: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Rustam ALLAKOV <rustamallakov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUp=xja80rBaB6NpY3RRdi750y046x28bo_xg29zKY72Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if there is more than one
concurrent update of the target row, the lock-and-retry code would
sometimes incorrectly identify the latest version of the target tuple,
leading to incorrect results.
This was caused by using the ctid field from the TM_FailureData
returned by table_tuple_lock() in a case where the result was TM_Ok,
which is unsafe because the TM_FailureData struct is not guaranteed to
be fully populated in that case. Instead, it should use the tupleid
passed to (and updated by) table_tuple_lock().
To reduce the chances of similar errors in the future, improve the
commentary for table_tuple_lock() and TM_FailureData to make it
clearer that table_tuple_lock() updates the tid passed to it, and most
fields of TM_FailureData should not be relied on in non-failure cases.
An exception to this is the "traversed" field, which is set in both
success and failure cases.
Reported-by: Dmitry <dsy.075@yandex.ru>
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1570d30e-2b95-4239-b9c3-f7bf2f2f8556@yandex.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
Replace 'committs' with 'commits'.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEoWx2=BESkfXsZ9jQW+1NcGTazKuj2wEXsPm1_EpgzHs0BHDQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit d31bbfb6590 lost some test coverage, because the situation
being tested, a concurrent DROP, cannot happen anymore. Put the test
coverage back with a bit of a trick, by deleting directly from the
catalog table.
Co-authored-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/bf72b82c-124d-4efa-a484-bb928e9494e4@eisentraut.org
|
|
This test was failing because MD5 computations are not supported in
these environments. This switches the test to rely on sha256() instead,
providing the same coverage while avoiding the failure.
Oversight in f57e214d1cbb. Per buildfarm members gecko, molamola,
shikra and froghopper.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aKJijS2ZRfRZiYb0@paquier.xyz
|
|
This test exercises the corner case in toast_save_datum() where CLUSTER
operations encounter duplicated TOAST references, reusing the existing
TOAST data instead of creating redundant copies.
During table rewrites like CLUSTER, both live and recently-dead versions
of a row may reference the same TOAST value. When copying the second or
later version of such a row, the system checks if a TOAST value already
exists in the new TOAST table using toastrel_valueid_exists(). If
found, toast_save_datum() sets data_todo = 0 so as redundant data is not
stored, ensuring only one copy of the TOAST value exists in the new
table.
The test relies on a combination of UPDATE, CLUSTER, and checks of the
TOAST values used before and after the relation rewrite, to make sure
that the same values are reused across the rewrite.
This is a continuation of 69f75d671475 to make sure that this corner
case keeps working should we mess with this area of the code.
Author: Nikhil Kumar Veldanda <veldanda.nikhilkumar17@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFAfj_E+kw5P713S8_jZyVgQAGVFfzFiTUJPrgo-TTtJJoazQw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Previously our tests did not exercise kill_prior_tuples for hash and gist. For
gist some related paths were reached, but gist's implementation seems to not
work if all the dead tuples are on one page (or something like that). The
coverage for other index types was rather incidental.
Thus add an explicit test ensuring kill_prior_tuples works at all.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/lxzj26ga6ippdeunz6kuncectr5gfuugmm2ry22qu6hcx6oid6@lzx3sjsqhmt6
|
|
If a MERGE inside a CTE attempts an UPDATE or DELETE on a table with
BEFORE ROW triggers, and a concurrent UPDATE or DELETE happens, the
merge code would fail (crashing in the case of an UPDATE action, and
potentially executing the wrong action for a DELETE action).
This is the same issue that 9321c79c86 attempted to fix, except now
for a MERGE inside a CTE. As noted in 9321c79c86, what needs to happen
is for the trigger code to exit early, returning the TM_Result and
TM_FailureData information to the merge code, if a concurrent
modification is detected, rather than attempting to do an EPQ
recheck. The merge code will then do its own rechecking, and rescan
the action list, potentially executing a different action in light of
the concurrent update. In particular, the trigger code must never call
ExecGetUpdateNewTuple() for MERGE, since that is bound to fail because
MERGE has its own per-action projection information.
Commit 9321c79c86 did this using estate->es_plannedstmt->commandType
in the trigger code to detect that a MERGE was being executed, which
is fine for a plain MERGE command, but does not work for a MERGE
inside a CTE. Fix by passing that information to the trigger code as
an additional parameter passed to ExecBRUpdateTriggers() and
ExecBRDeleteTriggers().
Back-patch as far as v17 only, since MERGE cannot appear inside a CTE
prior to that. Additionally, take care to preserve the trigger ABI in
v17 (though not in v18, which is still in beta).
Bug: #18986
Reported-by: Yaroslav Syrytsia <me@ys.lc>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18986-e7a8aac3d339fa47@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
When a foreign key constraint is placed on a partitioned table, we
actually make two pg_constraint entries associated with that table.
(I have my doubts about the wisdom of that, but it's been like that
since v12 and post-feature-freeze is no time to be messing with such
entrenched decisions.) The second "child" entry always had a name
generated according to the default rule, "table_column(s)_fkey[nnn]",
even if the primary entry had an unrelated user-specified name. The
trouble with doing that is that the default name could collide with
the user-specified name of some other constraint on the same table.
While we were willing to adjust the generated name to avoid
collisions, that only helps if it's made second; if it's made first
then creation of the other constraint would fail, potentially causing
dump/reload or pg_upgrade failures.
The core of the problem here is that we're infringing on user
namespace, so I doubt that there's any 100% solution other than to
find a way to not need the "child" entry. In the meantime, it seems
like it'd be an improvement to make the child's name be the name of
the parent constraint with an underscore and digit(s) appended as
necessary to make it unique. This rule can in theory fail in the same
way, but it seems much less probable; for one thing, this rule is
guaranteed not to match primary entries having auto-generated names.
(While an auto-generated primary name isn't user-specified to begin
with, it acts like that during dump/reload, so collisions against such
names are definitely possible.)
An additional bonus, visible in some of the regression test cases
that change here, arises from the fact that some error messages
cite the child constraint's name not the parent's. In the
previous approach the two names could be completely unrelated,
leading to user confusion --- the more so since psql's \d command
hides child constraints. With this approach it's hopefully much
clearer which constraint-the-user-knows-about is failing.
However, that does mean that there's user-visible behavior change
occurring here, making it seem like not something to back-patch.
I feel it's not too late for v18, though.
Reported-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPhGitjpTfzEMJN-Y2x+Q-5QChSxAsmSJ1-E8mQJLkHOqQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
With debug_discard_caches = 1, the runtime of this test script
increased by about a factor of 10 after commit 0dca5d68d. That's
causing some of our buildfarm animals to fail with a timeout.
The reason for the increased time is that now we are re-planning
some intentionally-non-inlineable SQL functions on every execution,
where the previous coding held onto the original plans throughout
the outer query. The previous behavior was arguably quite buggy,
so I don't think 0dca5d68d deserves blame here. But we would
like this test script to not take so long.
To fix, instead of forcing a "parallel safe" label via a
non-inlineable SQL function, apply it directly to the advisory-lock
functions by making internal-language aliases for them. A small
problem is that the advisory-lock functions return void but this
test would really like them to return integer 1. I cheated here by
declaring the aliases as returning "int". That's perhaps undue
familiarity with the implementation of PG_RETURN_VOID(), but that
hasn't changed in twenty years and is unlikely to do so in the next
twenty. That gets us an integer 0 result, and then an inline-able
wrapper to convert that to an integer 1 allows the rest of the script
to remain unchanged.
For me, this reduces the runtime with debug_discard_caches = 1
by about 100x, making the test comfortably faster than before
instead of slower.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/136163.1744179562@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
In the previous commit HeapBitmapScan's skip_fetch optimization was removed,
due to being broken in not easily fixable ways. Add a test that verifies we
don't re-introduce this bug if somebody tries to re-add the feature.
Only add the test to master for now, it's possible it's not entirely
stable. That seems sufficient, as we're not going to re-introduce the feature
on the backbranches. I did verify that the test passes on all branches. If the
test turns out to be unproblematic, we can backpatch it later, should we feel
a need to do so.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wg3gXXZTr6_rwC+s4-o2ZVFB5F985uUSgJTsECx6AmGcQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This allows the RETURNING list of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE queries
to explicitly return old and new values by using the special aliases
"old" and "new", which are automatically added to the query (if not
already defined) while parsing its RETURNING list, allowing things
like:
RETURNING old.colname, new.colname, ...
RETURNING old.*, new.*
Additionally, a new syntax is supported, allowing the names "old" and
"new" to be changed to user-supplied alias names, e.g.:
RETURNING WITH (OLD AS o, NEW AS n) o.colname, n.colname, ...
This is useful when the names "old" and "new" are already defined,
such as inside trigger functions, allowing backwards compatibility to
be maintained -- the interpretation of any existing queries that
happen to already refer to relations called "old" or "new", or use
those as aliases for other relations, is not changed.
For an INSERT, old values will generally be NULL, and for a DELETE,
new values will generally be NULL, but that may change for an INSERT
with an ON CONFLICT ... DO UPDATE clause, or if a query rewrite rule
changes the command type. Therefore, we put no restrictions on the use
of old and new in any DML queries.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He and Jeff Davis.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWx0J0-v=Qjc6gXzR=KtsdvAE7Ow=D=mu50AgOe+pvisQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Many of them just seem to have been copied around for no real reason.
Their presence causes (small) risks of hiding actual type mismatches
or silently discarding qualifiers
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/461ea37c-8b58-43b4-9736-52884e862820@eisentraut.org
|
|
Refactor objectNamesToOids() to use get_object_address() internally if
possible. Not only does this save a lot of code, it also allows us to
use the object locking provided by get_object_address() for
GRANT/REVOKE. There was previously a code comment that complained
about the lack of locking in objectNamesToOids(), which is now fixed.
The check in ExecGrant_Type_check() is obsolete because
get_object_address_type() already does the same check.
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/bf72b82c-124d-4efa-a484-bb928e9494e4@eisentraut.org
|
|
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update. In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER
TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a
source of index corruption. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions).
The back branch versions don't change WAL, because those branches just
added end-of-recovery SIResetAll(). All branches change the ABI of
extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(). No PGXN extension
calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
|
|
Stop computing a never-used value. This removes the read; the read had
no functional implications. Back-patch to v12, like commit
a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6c92f59b-f5bc-e58c-9bdd-d1f21c17c786@gmail.com
|
|
The previous commit fixed some ways of losing an inplace update. It
remained possible to lose one when a backend working toward a
heap_update() copied a tuple into memory just before inplace update of
that tuple. In catalogs eligible for inplace update, use LOCKTAG_TUPLE
to govern admission to the steps of copying an old tuple, modifying it,
and issuing heap_update(). This includes MERGE commands. To avoid
changing most of the pg_class DDL, don't require LOCKTAG_TUPLE when
holding a relation lock sufficient to exclude inplace updaters.
Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In v13 and v12, "UPDATE
pg_class" or "UPDATE pg_database" can still lose an inplace update. The
v14+ UPDATE fix needs commit 86dc90056dfdbd9d1b891718d2e5614e3e432f35,
and it wasn't worth reimplementing that fix without such infrastructure.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231027214946.79.nmisch@google.com
|
|
As previously-added tests demonstrated, heap_inplace_update() could
instead update an unrelated tuple of the same catalog. It could lose
the update. Losing relhasindex=t was a source of index corruption.
Inplace-updating commands like VACUUM will now wait for heap_update()
commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE. That isn't ideal, but a
long-running GRANT already hurts VACUUM progress more just by keeping an
XID running. The VACUUM will behave like a DELETE or UPDATE waiting for
the uncommitted change.
For implementation details, start at the systable_inplace_update_begin()
header comment and README.tuplock. Back-patch to v12 (all supported
versions). In back branches, retain a deprecated heap_inplace_update(),
for extensions.
Reported by Smolkin Grigory. Reviewed by Nitin Motiani, (in earlier
versions) Heikki Linnakangas, and (in earlier versions) Alexander
Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMp+ueZQz3yDk7qg42hk6-9gxniYbp-=bG2mgqecErqR5gGGOA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit reverts 1adf16b8fb, 87c21bb941, and subsequent fixes and
improvements including df64c81ca9, c99ef1811a, 9dfcac8e15, 885742b9f8,
842c9b2705, fcf80c5d5f, 96c7381c4c, f4fc7cb54b, 60ae37a8bc, 259c96fa8f,
449cdcd486, 3ca43dbbb6, 2a679ae94e, 3a82c689fd, fbd4321fd5, d53a4286d7,
c086896625, 4e5d6c4091, 04158e7fa3.
The reason for reverting is security issues related to repeatable name lookups
(CVE-2014-0062). Even though 04158e7fa3 solved part of the problem, there
are still remaining issues, which aren't feasible to even carefully analyze
before the RC deadline.
Reported-by: Noah Misch, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240808171351.a9.nmisch%40google.com
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
Previously, when a path type was disabled by e.g. enable_seqscan=false,
we either avoided generating that path type in the first place, or
more commonly, we added a large constant, called disable_cost, to the
estimated startup cost of that path. This latter approach can distort
planning. For instance, an extremely expensive non-disabled path
could seem to be worse than a disabled path, especially if the full
cost of that path node need not be paid (e.g. due to a Limit).
Or, as in the regression test whose expected output changes with this
commit, the addition of disable_cost can make two paths that would
normally be distinguishible in cost seem to have fuzzily the same cost.
To fix that, we now count the number of disabled path nodes and
consider that a high-order component of both the startup cost and the
total cost. Hence, the path list is now sorted by disabled_nodes and
then by total_cost, instead of just by the latter, and likewise for
the partial path list. It is important that this number is a count
and not simply a Boolean; else, as soon as we're unable to respect
disabled path types in all portions of the path, we stop trying to
avoid them where we can.
Because the path list is now sorted by the number of disabled nodes,
the join prechecks must compute the count of disabled nodes during
the initial cost phase instead of postponing it to final cost time.
Counts of disabled nodes do not cross subquery levels; at present,
there is no reason for them to do so, since the we do not postpone
path selection across subquery boundaries (see make_subplan).
Reviewed by Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, and David Rowley.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_+MS+o6NeGK2xyBv-xM+w1AfFVuHE4f_aq6ekHv7YSQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This used to be part of CREATE OPERATOR CLASS and ALTER OPERATOR
FAMILY, but it has done nothing (except issue a NOTICE) since
PostgreSQL 8.4. Commit 30e7c175b81 removed support for dumping from
pre-9.2 servers, so this no longer serves any need.
This now removes it completely, and you'd get a normal parse error if
you used it.
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/113ef2d2-3657-4353-be97-f28fceddbca1%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Before Bison 3.4, the generated parser implementation files run afoul
of -Wmissing-variable-declarations (in spite of commit ab61c40bfa2)
because declarations for yylval and possibly yylloc are missing. The
generated header files contain an extern declaration, but the
implementation files don't include the header files. Since Bison 3.4,
the generated implementation files automatically include the generated
header files, so then it works.
To make this work with older Bison versions as well, include the
generated header file from the .y file.
(With older Bison versions, the generated implementation file contains
effectively a copy of the header file pasted in, so including the
header file is redundant. But we know this works anyway because the
core grammar uses this arrangement already.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
|
This adds extern declarations for some global variables produced by
Bison that are not already declared in its generated header file.
This is a workaround to be able to add -Wmissing-variable-declarations
to the global set of warning options in the near future.
Another longer-term solution would be to convert these grammars to
"pure" parsers in Bison, to avoid global variables altogether. Note
that the core grammar is already pure, so this patch did not need to
touch it.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
|
These probably should have been static all along, it was only
forgotten out of sloppiness.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
|
Per buildfarm members prion and trilobite. Back-patch to v12 (all
supported versions), like commit
0844b3968985447ed0a6937cfc8639e379da2fe6.
Strategy reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240628051353.a0.nmisch@google.com
|
|
This covers both regular and inplace changes, since bugs arise at their
intersection. Where marked, these witness extant bugs. Back-patch to
v12 (all supported versions).
Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
|
|
This fixes various typos, duplicated words, and tiny bits of whitespace
mainly in code comments but also in docs.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3F577953-A29E-4722-98AD-2DA9EFF2CBB8@yesql.se
|
|
The fixes relate to comments, error messages, and corresponding expected output
of regression tests.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49DDsknxyoycBqiE72VxzL_sYHF6zqL8dSeNehKPJhkKg%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/86bfd241-a58c-479a-9a72-2c67a02becf8%40postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNkGMPU50QG7V6Q60JGFORfo8LfYO1_GCkCa0VWbmB-fEw%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Richard Guo, Dmitry Koval, Tender Wang
|
|
This new DDL command splits a single partition into several parititions.
Just like ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS ... command, new patitions are
created using createPartitionTable() function with parent partition as the
template.
This commit comprises quite naive implementation which works in single process
and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all the
operations including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL command
can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load. However,
this implementation come in handy in certain cases even as is.
Also, it could be used as a foundation for future implementations with lesser
locking and possibly parallel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Laurenz Albe, Zhihong Yu, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas, Stephane Tachoires
|
|
This new DDL command merges several partitions into the one partition of the
target table. The target partition is created using new
createPartitionTable() function with parent partition as the template.
This commit comprises quite naive implementation which works in single process
and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all the
operations including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL command
can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load. However,
this implementation come in handy in certain cases even as is.
Also, it could be used as a foundation for future implementations with lesser
locking and possibly parallel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Laurenz Albe, Zhihong Yu, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas, Stephane Tachoires
|
|
This allows MERGE commands to include WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE
actions, which operate on rows that exist in the target relation, but
not in the data source. These actions can execute UPDATE, DELETE, or
DO NOTHING sub-commands.
This is in contrast to already-supported WHEN NOT MATCHED actions,
which operate on rows that exist in the data source, but not in the
target relation. To make this distinction clearer, such actions may
now be written as WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET.
Writing WHEN NOT MATCHED without specifying BY SOURCE or BY TARGET is
equivalent to writing WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Alvaro Herrera, Ted Yu and Vik Fearing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWqnKGc57Y_JanUBHQXNKcXd7r=0R4NEZUVwP+syRkWbA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAPpHfdua-YFw3XTprfutzGp28xXLigFtzNbuFY8yPhqeq6X5kg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit 61461a300c1c introduced new functions to libpq for cancelling
queries. This replaces the usage of the old ones in parts of the
codebase with these newer ones. This specifically leaves out changes to
psql and pgbench, as those would need a much larger refactor to be able
to call them due to the new functions not being signal-safe; and also
postgres_fdw, because the original code there is not clear to me
(Álvaro) and not fully tested.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQT_VgOWWENUqvUV9xQmbaCyXjtRRAYO8W07oqashk_N+g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We don't determine the position at which a process waiting for a lock
should insert itself into the wait queue until we reach ProcSleep(),
and we may at that point discover that we must insert ourselves ahead
of everyone who wants a conflicting lock, in which case we obtain the
lock immediately. Up until now, a no-wait lock acquisition would fail
in such cases, erroneously claiming that the lock couldn't be obtained
immediately. Fix that by trying ProcSleep even in the no-wait case.
No back-patch for now, because I'm treating this as an improvement to
the existing no-wait feature. It could instead be argued that it's a
bug fix, on the theory that there should never be any case whatsoever
where no-wait fails to obtain a lock that would have been obtained
immediately without no-wait, but I'm reluctant to interpret the
semantics of no-wait that strictly.
Robert Haas and Jingxian Li
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobCH-kMXGVpb0BB-iNMdtcNkTvcZ4JBxDJows3kYM+GDg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Roles with MAINTAIN on a relation may run VACUUM, ANALYZE, REINDEX,
REFRESH MATERIALIZE VIEW, CLUSTER, and LOCK TABLE on the relation.
Roles with privileges of pg_maintain may run those same commands on
all relations.
This was previously committed for v16, but it was reverted in
commit 151c22deee due to concerns about search_path tricks that
could be used to escalate privileges to the table owner. Commits
2af07e2f74, 59825d1639, and c7ea3f4229 resolved these concerns by
restricting search_path when running maintenance commands.
Bumps catversion.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240305161235.GA3478007%40nathanxps13
|
|
Most callers of strerror() are removed from the backend code. The
remaining callers require special handling with a saved errno from a
previous system call. The frontend code still needs strerror() where
error states need to be handled outside of fprintf.
Note that pg_regress is not changed to use %m as the TAP output may
clobber errno, since those functions call fprintf() and friends before
evaluating the format string.
Support for %m in src/port/snprintf.c has been added in d6c55de1f99a,
hence all the stable branches currently supported include it.
Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sf13jhuw.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
|
|
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row, and the SQL standard explicitly says that this must be
an error.
2). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by a later command
in the current transaction. This can happen if the tuple is
modified by a BEFORE trigger or a volatile function used in the
query, and should be an error for the same reason that it is in a
plain UPDATE or DELETE command.
In MERGE's primary error handling block, it failed to check for (2),
causing it to return a misleading error message in such cases.
In the secondary error handling block, following a concurrent update
from another session, it failed to check for (1), causing it to
silently ignore target rows joined to more than one source row,
instead of reporting an error.
Fix this, and add tests for both of these cases.
Per report from Wenjiang Zhang. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was
introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_41DE0FF443FE14B94A5898D373792109E408%40qq.com
|
