| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
|
|
Previously, any attempt to request a 3.x protocol version other than
3.0 would lead to a hard connection failure, which made the minor
protocol version really no different from the major protocol version
and precluded gentle protocol version breaks. Instead, when the
client requests a 3.x protocol version where x is greater than 0, send
the new NegotiateProtocolVersion message to convey that we support
only 3.0. This makes it possible to introduce new minor protocol
versions without requiring a connection retry when the server is
older.
In addition, if the startup packet includes name/value pairs where
the name starts with "_pq_.", assume that those are protocol options,
not GUCs. Include those we don't support (i.e. all of them, at
present) in the NegotiateProtocolVersion message so that the client
knows they were not understood. This makes it possible for the
client to request previously-unsupported features without bumping
the protocol version at all; the client can tell from the server's
response whether the option was understood.
It will take some time before servers that support these new
facilities become common in the wild; to speed things up and make
things easier for a future 3.1 protocol version, back-patch to all
supported releases.
Robert Haas and Badrul Chowdhury
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/BN6PR21MB0772FFA0CBD298B76017744CD1730@BN6PR21MB0772.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/30788.1498672033@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This causes a warning when accidentally backpatching an XML-style
empty-element tag like <xref linkend="abc"/>.
|
|
|
|
Security: CVE-2017-12172, CVE-2017-15098, CVE-2017-15099
|
|
In the v10 branch, also back-patch the effects of 1ff01b390 and c29c57890
on these files, to reduce future maintenance issues. (I'd do it further
back, except that the 9.X branches differ anyway due to xlog-to-wal
link tag renaming.)
|
|
Reported by Dan Vianello.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e6e12f18f70e46848c058084d42fb651@KSTLMEXGP001.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com
|
|
The NOTIFY page said this already, but the PREPARE TRANSACTION page
missed it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171024010602.1488.80066@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
The GRANT reference page, which lists the default privileges for new
objects, failed to mention that USAGE is granted by default for data
types and domains. As a lesser sin, it also did not specify anything
about the initial privileges for sequences, FDWs, foreign servers,
or large objects. Fix that, and add a comment to acldefault() in the
probably vain hope of getting people to maintain this list in future.
Noted by Laurenz Albe, though I editorialized on the wording a bit.
Back-patch to all supported branches, since they all have this behavior.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1507620895.4152.1.camel@cybertec.at
|
|
It drops objects outside information_schema that depend on objects
inside information_schema. For example, it will drop a user-defined
view if the view query refers to information_schema.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170831025345.GE3963697@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
|
|
As long as PQntuples, PQgetvalue, etc, use "int" for row numbers, we're
pretty much stuck with this limitation. The documentation formerly stated
that the result of PQntuples "might overflow on 32-bit operating systems",
which is just nonsense: that's not where the overflow would happen, and
if you did reach an overflow it would not be on a 32-bit machine, because
you'd have OOM'd long since.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+FnnTxyLWyjY1goewmJNxC==HQCCF4fKkoCTa9qR36oRAHDPw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The explanation about "0" versus "9" format characters was confusing
and arguably wrong; the discussion of sign handling wasn't very good
either. Notably, while it's accurate to say that "FM" strips leading
zeroes in date/time values, what it really does with numeric values
is to strip *trailing* zeroes, and then only if you wrote "9" rather
than "0". Per gripes from Erwin Brandstetter.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGHENJ7jgRbTn6nf48xNZ=FHgL2WQ4X8mYsUAU57f-vq8PubEw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGHENJ45ymd=GOCu1vwV9u7GmCR80_5tW0fP9C_gJKbruGMHvQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFcNs+pJ6_Ud-zg3vY_Y0mzfESdM34Humt8avKrAKq_H+v18Cg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security: CVE-2017-7546, CVE-2017-7547, CVE-2017-7548
|
|
Commit 3eefc51053f250837c3115c12f8119d16881a2d7 claimed to make
pg_user_mappings enforce the qualifications user_mapping_options had
been enforcing, but its removal of a longstanding restriction left them
distinct when the current user is the subject of a mapping yet has no
server privileges. user_mapping_options emits no rows for such a
mapping, but pg_user_mappings includes full umoptions. Change
pg_user_mappings to show null for umoptions. Back-patch to 9.2, like
the above commit.
Reviewed by Tom Lane. Reported by Jeff Janes.
Security: CVE-2017-7547
|
|
|
|
ALTER USER ... SET did not support all the syntax variants of ALTER ROLE
... SET.
Reported-by: Pavel Golub <pavel@microolap.com>
|
|
FlightAware is still maintaining this, and indeed is seemingly being
more active with it than the pgtclng fork is. List both, for the
time being anyway.
In the back branches, also back-port commit e20f679f6 and other
recent updates to the client-interfaces list. I think these are
probably of current interest to users of back branches. I did
not touch the list of externally maintained PLs in the back
branches, though. Those are much more likely to be server version
sensitive, and I don't know which of these PLs work all the way back.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170730162612.1449.58796@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Previously the docs just said "5.8 or later". Experimentation shows
that while you can build on Unix from a git checkout with 5.8.0,
compiling recent PL/Perl requires at least 5.8.1, and you won't be
able to run the TAP tests with less than 5.8.3 because that's when
they added "prove". (I do not have any information on just what the
MSVC build scripts require.)
Since all these versions are quite ancient, let's not split hairs
in the docs, but just say that 5.8.3 is the minimum requirement.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16894.1501392088@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Claiming that NATURAL JOIN is equivalent to CROSS JOIN when there are
no common column names is only strictly correct if it's an inner join;
you can't say e.g. CROSS LEFT JOIN. Better to explain it as meaning
JOIN ON TRUE, instead. Per a suggestion from David Johnston.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwb+mYszQhDS9f_dqRrk1=Pe-S6D=XMkAXcDf4ykKPmgKQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
log_lock_waits is PGC_SUSET, but config.sgml lacked the standard
boilerplate sentence noting that.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20170719100838.19352.16320@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
We're throwing people into the guts of the syntax with not much context;
let's back up one step and point out that this goes inside a literal in
a CREATE FUNCTION command. Per suggestion from Kurt Kartaltepe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACawnnyWAmH+au8nfZhLiFfWKjXy4d0kY+eZWfcxPRnjVfaa_Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Original wording had confusingly vague antecedent for "they", so replace
that with a more repetitive but clearer formulation. In passing, make the
link to the installation requirements section more specific. Per gripe
from Martin Mai, though this is not the fix he initially proposed.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN_NWRu-cWuNaiXUjV3m4H-riWURuPW=j21bSaLADs6rjjzXgQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Buildfarm evidence shows that TCP_KEEPALIVE_THRESHOLD doesn't exist
after all on Solaris < 11. This means we need to take positive action to
prevent the TCP_KEEPALIVE code path from being taken on that platform.
I've chosen to limit it with "&& defined(__darwin__)", since it's unclear
that anyone else would follow Apple's precedent of spelling the symbol
that way.
Also, follow a suggestion from Michael Paquier of eliminating code
duplication by defining a couple of intermediate symbols for the
socket option.
In passing, make some effort to reduce the number of translatable messages
by replacing "setsockopt(foo) failed" with "setsockopt(%s) failed", etc,
throughout the affected files. And update relevant documentation so
that it doesn't claim to provide an exhaustive list of the possible
socket option names.
Like the previous commit (f0256c774), back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170627163757.25161.528@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
When materialized views were added, psql's \d commands were made to
treat them as a separate object category ... but not everyplace in the
documentation or comments got the memo.
Noted by David Johnston. Back-patch to 9.3 where matviews came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwb27M3VXRhHErjCpkWwN9eKThbqWb1=trtoXi9_ejqPXQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
pg_upgrade never used Windows junction points but instead always used
Windows hard links.
Reported-by: Adrian Klaver
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6a638c60-90bb-4921-8ee4-5fdad68f8b09@aklaver.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3, where the mention first appeared
|
|
It was explained that read only transactions (not in standby) allow to
update sequences. This had been wrong since the commit:
05d8a561ff85db1545f5768fe8d8dc9d99ad2ef7
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170614.110826.425627939780392324.t-ishii%40sraoss.co.jp
|
|
Changed by: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
|
|
On some platforms, -fpic fails for sufficiently large shared libraries.
We've mostly not hit that boundary yet, but there are some extensions
such as Citus and pglogical where it's becoming a problem. A bit of
research suggests that the penalty for -fPIC is small, in the
single-digit-percentage range --- and there's none at all on popular
platforms such as x86_64. So let's just default to -fPIC everywhere
and provide one less thing for extension developers to worry about.
Per complaint from Christoph Berg. Back-patch to all supported branches.
(I did not bother to touch the recently-removed Makefiles for sco and
unixware in the back branches, though. We'd have no way to test that
it doesn't break anything on those platforms.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170529155850.qojdfrwkkqnjb3ap@msg.df7cb.de
|
|
pg_resetwal (formerly pg_resetxlog) doesn't insist on finding a matching
version number in pg_control, and that seems like an important thing to
preserve since recovering from corrupt pg_control is a prime reason to
need to run it. However, that means you can try to run it against a
data directory of a different major version, which is at best useless
and at worst disastrous. So as to provide some protection against that
type of pilot error, inspect PG_VERSION at startup and refuse to do
anything if it doesn't match. PG_VERSION is read-only after initdb,
so it's unlikely to get corrupted, and even if it were corrupted it would
be easy to fix by hand.
This hazard has been there all along, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Michael Paquier, with some kibitzing by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f4b8eb91-b934-8a0d-b3cc-68f06e2279d1@enterprisedb.com
|
|
This variable was only used with Kerberos v4. That support was removed
in 2005, but we forgot to remove the documentation.
Noted by Shinichi Matsuda
|
|
The cash_div_intX functions applied rint() to the result of the division.
That's not merely useless (because the result is already an integer) but
it causes precision loss for values larger than 2^52 or so, because of
the forced conversion to float8.
On the other hand, the cash_mul_fltX functions neglected to apply rint() to
their multiplication results, thus possibly causing off-by-one outputs.
Per C standard, arithmetic between any integral value and a float value is
performed in float format. Thus, cash_mul_flt4 and cash_div_flt4 produced
answers good to only about six digits, even when the float value is exact.
We can improve matters noticeably by widening the float inputs to double.
(It's tempting to consider using "long double" arithmetic if available,
but that's probably too much of a stretch for a back-patched fix.)
Also, document that cash_div_intX operators truncate rather than round.
Per bug #14663 from Richard Pistole. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22403.1495223615@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This is more secure, and saves a redirect since we no longer accept
plain HTTP connections on the website.
References in code comments should probably be updated too, but
that doesn't seem to need back-patching, whereas this does.
Also, in the 9.2 branch, remove suggestion that you can get the
source code via FTP, since that service will be shut down soon.
Daniel Gustafsson, with a few additional changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9A2C89A7-0BB8-41A8-B288-8B7BD09D7D44@yesql.se
|
|
This has to be backpatched to all supported releases so release markup
added to HEAD and copied to back branches matches the existing markup.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: 2b8a2552-fffa-f7c8-97c5-14db47a87731@2ndquadrant.com
Author: initial patch and sample markup by Peter Eisentraut
Backpatch-through: 9.2
|
|
|
|
Security: CVE-2017-7484, CVE-2017-7485, CVE-2017-7486
|
|
Both views replace the umoptions field with NULL when the user does not
meet qualifications to see it. They used different qualifications, and
pg_user_mappings documented qualifications did not match its implemented
qualifications. Make its documentation and implementation match those
of user_mapping_options. One might argue for stronger qualifications,
but these have long, documented tenure. pg_user_mappings has always
exhibited this problem, so back-patch to 9.2 (all supported versions).
Michael Paquier and Feike Steenbergen. Reviewed by Jeff Janes.
Reported by Andrew Wheelwright.
Security: CVE-2017-7486
|
|
Commit 65c3bf19fd3e1f6a591618e92eb4c54d0b217564 moved handling of the,
already then, deprecated requiressl parameter into conninfo_storeval().
The default PGREQUIRESSL environment variable was however lost in the
change resulting in a potentially silent accept of a non-SSL connection
even when set. Its documentation remained. Restore its implementation.
Also amend the documentation to mark PGREQUIRESSL as deprecated for
those not following the link to requiressl. Back-patch to 9.3, where
commit 65c3bf1 first appeared.
Behavior has been more complex when the user provides both deprecated
and non-deprecated settings. Before commit 65c3bf1, libpq operated
according to the first of these found:
requiressl=1
PGREQUIRESSL=1
sslmode=*
PGSSLMODE=*
(Note requiressl=0 didn't override sslmode=*; it would only suppress
PGREQUIRESSL=1 or a previous requiressl=1. PGREQUIRESSL=0 had no effect
whatsoever.) Starting with commit 65c3bf1, libpq ignored PGREQUIRESSL,
and order of precedence changed to this:
last of requiressl=* or sslmode=*
PGSSLMODE=*
Starting now, adopt the following order of precedence:
last of requiressl=* or sslmode=*
PGSSLMODE=*
PGREQUIRESSL=1
This retains the 65c3bf1 behavior for connection strings that contain
both requiressl=* and sslmode=*. It retains the 65c3bf1 change that
either connection string option overrides both environment variables.
For the first time, PGSSLMODE has precedence over PGREQUIRESSL; this
avoids reducing security of "PGREQUIRESSL=1 PGSSLMODE=verify-full"
configurations originating under v9.3 and later.
Daniel Gustafsson
Security: CVE-2017-7485
|
|
Some selectivity estimation functions run user-supplied operators over
data obtained from pg_statistic without security checks, which allows
those operators to leak pg_statistic data without having privileges on
the underlying tables. Fix by checking that one of the following is
satisfied: (1) the user has table or column privileges on the table
underlying the pg_statistic data, or (2) the function implementing the
user-supplied operator is leak-proof. If neither is satisfied, planning
will proceed as if there are no statistics available.
At least one of these is satisfied in most cases in practice. The only
situations that are negatively impacted are user-defined or
not-leak-proof operators on a security-barrier view.
Reported-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Security: CVE-2017-7484
|
|
|
|
This system function has been there a very long time, but somehow escaped
being listed in func.sgml.
Fabien Coelho and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.20.1705061027580.3896@lancre
|
|
The reference "That is the topic of the next section." has been
incorrect since the materialized views documentation got inserted
between the section "rules-views" and "rules-update".
Author: Zertrin <postgres_wiki@zertrin.org>
|
|
This backpatches 51e26c9 and 7220c7b, including both documentation
updates clarifying the checkpoints at the beginning of base backups and
the messages in verbose and progress mdoe of pg_basebackup.
Author: Michael Banck
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21444.1488142764%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Previously a detailed activity report by VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE was
described as an example of VACUUM in docs. But it had been obsolete
for a long time. For example, commit feb4f44d296b88b7f0723f4a4f3945a371276e0b
updated the content of that activity report in 2003, but we had
forgotten to update the example.
So basically we need to update the example. But since no one cared
about the details of VACUUM output and complained about that mistake
for such long time, per discussion on hackers, we decided to get rid
of the detailed activity report from the example and simplify it.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Reported by Masahiko Sawada, patch by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAGA2pB3p-CWmTkxBsbkZS1bcDGBLcYVcvcDxspG_XAfA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
David Christensen
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/82299377-1480-4439-9ABA-5828D71AA22E@endpoint.com
|
