summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/contrib/test_decoding
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/test_decoding')
-rw-r--r--contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out45
-rw-r--r--contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec16
2 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out b/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out
index d2a4bdfcc13..8722787e6ed 100644
--- a/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out
+++ b/contrib/test_decoding/expected/catalog_change_snapshot.out
@@ -96,3 +96,48 @@ COMMIT
stop
(1 row)
+
+starting permutation: s0_init s0_begin s0_savepoint s0_insert s1_checkpoint s1_get_changes s0_insert2 s0_commit s0_begin s0_insert s1_checkpoint s1_get_changes s0_commit s1_get_changes
+step s0_init: SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('isolation_slot', 'test_decoding');
+?column?
+--------
+init
+(1 row)
+
+step s0_begin: BEGIN;
+step s0_savepoint: SAVEPOINT sp1;
+step s0_insert: INSERT INTO tbl1 VALUES (1);
+step s1_checkpoint: CHECKPOINT;
+step s1_get_changes: SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0');
+data
+----
+(0 rows)
+
+step s0_insert2: INSERT INTO user_cat VALUES (1);
+step s0_commit: COMMIT;
+step s0_begin: BEGIN;
+step s0_insert: INSERT INTO tbl1 VALUES (1);
+step s1_checkpoint: CHECKPOINT;
+step s1_get_changes: SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0');
+data
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+BEGIN
+table public.tbl1: INSERT: val1[integer]:1 val2[integer]:null
+table public.user_cat: INSERT: val1[integer]:1
+COMMIT
+(4 rows)
+
+step s0_commit: COMMIT;
+step s1_get_changes: SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'skip-empty-xacts', '1', 'include-xids', '0');
+data
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+BEGIN
+table public.tbl1: INSERT: val1[integer]:1 val2[integer]:null
+COMMIT
+(3 rows)
+
+?column?
+--------
+stop
+(1 row)
+
diff --git a/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec b/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec
index ff8f68489bb..673bccf4b0d 100644
--- a/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec
+++ b/contrib/test_decoding/specs/catalog_change_snapshot.spec
@@ -6,12 +6,14 @@ setup
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tbl2;
CREATE TABLE tbl1 (val1 integer, val2 integer);
CREATE TABLE tbl2 (val1 integer, val2 integer);
+ CREATE TABLE user_cat (val1 integer) WITH (user_catalog_table = true);
}
teardown
{
DROP TABLE tbl1;
DROP TABLE tbl2;
+ DROP TABLE user_cat;
SELECT 'stop' FROM pg_drop_replication_slot('isolation_slot');
}
@@ -22,6 +24,7 @@ step "s0_begin" { BEGIN; }
step "s0_savepoint" { SAVEPOINT sp1; }
step "s0_truncate" { TRUNCATE tbl1; }
step "s0_insert" { INSERT INTO tbl1 VALUES (1); }
+step "s0_insert2" { INSERT INTO user_cat VALUES (1); }
step "s0_commit" { COMMIT; }
session "s1"
@@ -57,3 +60,16 @@ permutation "s0_init" "s0_begin" "s0_savepoint" "s0_truncate" "s1_checkpoint" "s
# checkpoint record it prunes one of the xacts in that list and when decoding the
# next checkpoint, it will completely prune that list.
permutation "s0_init" "s0_begin" "s0_truncate" "s2_begin" "s2_truncate" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s0_commit" "s0_begin" "s0_insert" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s2_commit" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s0_commit" "s1_get_changes"
+
+# Test that we can handle the case where there is no association between top-level
+# transaction and its subtransactions. The last decoding restarts from the first
+# checkpoint, decodes NEW_CID generated by "s0_insert2", and marks the subtransaction
+# as containing catalog changes while adding tuple cids to its top-level transaction.
+# During that, both transaction entries are created in ReorderBuffer as top-level
+# transactions and have the same LSN. We check if the assertion check for the order
+# of transaction LSNs in AssertTXNLsnOrder() is skipped since we are still before the
+# LSN at which we start replaying the contents of transactions. Besides, when decoding
+# the commit record of the top-level transaction, we must force the top-level
+# transaction to do timetravel since one of its subtransactions has been marked as
+# containing catalog changes.
+permutation "s0_init" "s0_begin" "s0_savepoint" "s0_insert" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s0_insert2" "s0_commit" "s0_begin" "s0_insert" "s1_checkpoint" "s1_get_changes" "s0_commit" "s1_get_changes"