diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/commands/trigger.c | 134 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/include/commands/trigger.h | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/isolation/expected/merge-match-recheck.out | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/isolation/specs/merge-match-recheck.spec | 22 |
5 files changed, 153 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/trigger.c b/src/backend/commands/trigger.c index ea5cc10919d..ad28abe085f 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/trigger.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/trigger.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static bool GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate, ItemPointer tid, LockTupleMode lockmode, TupleTableSlot *oldslot, + bool do_epq_recheck, TupleTableSlot **epqslot, TM_Result *tmresultp, TM_FailureData *tmfdp); @@ -2679,13 +2680,14 @@ ExecASDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, * back the concurrently updated tuple if any. */ bool -ExecBRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, - ResultRelInfo *relinfo, - ItemPointer tupleid, - HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, - TupleTableSlot **epqslot, - TM_Result *tmresult, - TM_FailureData *tmfd) +ExecBRDeleteTriggersNew(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, + ResultRelInfo *relinfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, + TupleTableSlot **epqslot, + TM_Result *tmresult, + TM_FailureData *tmfd, + bool is_merge_delete) { TupleTableSlot *slot = ExecGetTriggerOldSlot(estate, relinfo); TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc; @@ -2700,9 +2702,17 @@ ExecBRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, { TupleTableSlot *epqslot_candidate = NULL; + /* + * Get a copy of the on-disk tuple we are planning to delete. In + * general, if the tuple has been concurrently updated, we should + * recheck it using EPQ. However, if this is a MERGE DELETE action, + * we skip this EPQ recheck and leave it to the caller (it must do + * additional rechecking, and might end up executing a different + * action entirely). + */ if (!GetTupleForTrigger(estate, epqstate, relinfo, tupleid, - LockTupleExclusive, slot, &epqslot_candidate, - tmresult, tmfd)) + LockTupleExclusive, slot, !is_merge_delete, + &epqslot_candidate, tmresult, tmfd)) return false; /* @@ -2766,6 +2776,24 @@ ExecBRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, } /* + * ABI-compatible wrapper to emulate old version of the above function. + * Do not call this version in new code. + */ +bool +ExecBRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, + ResultRelInfo *relinfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, + TupleTableSlot **epqslot, + TM_Result *tmresult, + TM_FailureData *tmfd) +{ + return ExecBRDeleteTriggersNew(estate, epqstate, relinfo, tupleid, + fdw_trigtuple, epqslot, tmresult, tmfd, + false); +} + +/* * Note: is_crosspart_update must be true if the DELETE is being performed * as part of a cross-partition update. */ @@ -2792,6 +2820,7 @@ ExecARDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, tupleid, LockTupleExclusive, slot, + false, NULL, NULL, NULL); @@ -2930,13 +2959,14 @@ ExecASUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, } bool -ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, - ResultRelInfo *relinfo, - ItemPointer tupleid, - HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, - TupleTableSlot *newslot, - TM_Result *tmresult, - TM_FailureData *tmfd) +ExecBRUpdateTriggersNew(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, + ResultRelInfo *relinfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, + TupleTableSlot *newslot, + TM_Result *tmresult, + TM_FailureData *tmfd, + bool is_merge_update) { TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc; TupleTableSlot *oldslot = ExecGetTriggerOldSlot(estate, relinfo); @@ -2957,10 +2987,17 @@ ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, { TupleTableSlot *epqslot_candidate = NULL; - /* get a copy of the on-disk tuple we are planning to update */ + /* + * Get a copy of the on-disk tuple we are planning to update. In + * general, if the tuple has been concurrently updated, we should + * recheck it using EPQ. However, if this is a MERGE UPDATE action, + * we skip this EPQ recheck and leave it to the caller (it must do + * additional rechecking, and might end up executing a different + * action entirely). + */ if (!GetTupleForTrigger(estate, epqstate, relinfo, tupleid, - lockmode, oldslot, &epqslot_candidate, - tmresult, tmfd)) + lockmode, oldslot, !is_merge_update, + &epqslot_candidate, tmresult, tmfd)) return false; /* cancel the update action */ /* @@ -3083,6 +3120,24 @@ ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, } /* + * ABI-compatible wrapper to emulate old version of the above function. + * Do not call this version in new code. + */ +bool +ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, + ResultRelInfo *relinfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, + TupleTableSlot *newslot, + TM_Result *tmresult, + TM_FailureData *tmfd) +{ + return ExecBRUpdateTriggersNew(estate, epqstate, relinfo, tupleid, + fdw_trigtuple, newslot, tmresult, tmfd, + false); +} + +/* * Note: 'src_partinfo' and 'dst_partinfo', when non-NULL, refer to the source * and destination partitions, respectively, of a cross-partition update of * the root partitioned table mentioned in the query, given by 'relinfo'. @@ -3132,6 +3187,7 @@ ExecARUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, tupleid, LockTupleExclusive, oldslot, + false, NULL, NULL, NULL); @@ -3288,6 +3344,7 @@ GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate, ItemPointer tid, LockTupleMode lockmode, TupleTableSlot *oldslot, + bool do_epq_recheck, TupleTableSlot **epqslot, TM_Result *tmresultp, TM_FailureData *tmfdp) @@ -3347,29 +3404,30 @@ GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate, if (tmfd.traversed) { /* - * Recheck the tuple using EPQ. For MERGE, we leave this - * to the caller (it must do additional rechecking, and - * might end up executing a different action entirely). + * Recheck the tuple using EPQ, if requested. Otherwise, + * just return that it was concurrently updated. */ - if (estate->es_plannedstmt->commandType == CMD_MERGE) + if (do_epq_recheck) { - if (tmresultp) - *tmresultp = TM_Updated; - return false; + *epqslot = EvalPlanQual(epqstate, + relation, + relinfo->ri_RangeTableIndex, + oldslot); + + /* + * If PlanQual failed for updated tuple - we must not + * process this tuple! + */ + if (TupIsNull(*epqslot)) + { + *epqslot = NULL; + return false; + } } - - *epqslot = EvalPlanQual(epqstate, - relation, - relinfo->ri_RangeTableIndex, - oldslot); - - /* - * If PlanQual failed for updated tuple - we must not - * process this tuple! - */ - if (TupIsNull(*epqslot)) + else { - *epqslot = NULL; + if (tmresultp) + *tmresultp = TM_Updated; return false; } } diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c index a0d1091ec01..c230b666706 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c @@ -1349,9 +1349,10 @@ ExecDeletePrologue(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, if (context->estate->es_insert_pending_result_relations != NIL) ExecPendingInserts(context->estate); - return ExecBRDeleteTriggers(context->estate, context->epqstate, - resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, - epqreturnslot, result, &context->tmfd); + return ExecBRDeleteTriggersNew(context->estate, context->epqstate, + resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, + epqreturnslot, result, &context->tmfd, + context->mtstate->operation == CMD_MERGE); } return true; @@ -1947,9 +1948,10 @@ ExecUpdatePrologue(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, if (context->estate->es_insert_pending_result_relations != NIL) ExecPendingInserts(context->estate); - return ExecBRUpdateTriggers(context->estate, context->epqstate, - resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, slot, - result, &context->tmfd); + return ExecBRUpdateTriggersNew(context->estate, context->epqstate, + resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, slot, + result, &context->tmfd, + context->mtstate->operation == CMD_MERGE); } return true; diff --git a/src/include/commands/trigger.h b/src/include/commands/trigger.h index 8a5a9fe6422..f9e4dc4f3cd 100644 --- a/src/include/commands/trigger.h +++ b/src/include/commands/trigger.h @@ -206,6 +206,15 @@ extern void ExecBSDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, extern void ExecASDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture); +extern bool ExecBRDeleteTriggersNew(EState *estate, + EPQState *epqstate, + ResultRelInfo *relinfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, + TupleTableSlot **epqslot, + TM_Result *tmresult, + TM_FailureData *tmfd, + bool is_merge_delete); extern bool ExecBRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, @@ -228,6 +237,15 @@ extern void ExecBSUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, extern void ExecASUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture); +extern bool ExecBRUpdateTriggersNew(EState *estate, + EPQState *epqstate, + ResultRelInfo *relinfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple, + TupleTableSlot *newslot, + TM_Result *tmresult, + TM_FailureData *tmfd, + bool is_merge_update); extern bool ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo, diff --git a/src/test/isolation/expected/merge-match-recheck.out b/src/test/isolation/expected/merge-match-recheck.out index 9a44a595927..90300f1db5a 100644 --- a/src/test/isolation/expected/merge-match-recheck.out +++ b/src/test/isolation/expected/merge-match-recheck.out @@ -241,19 +241,28 @@ starting permutation: update_bal1_tg merge_bal_tg c2 select1_tg c1 s2: NOTICE: Update: (1,160,s1,setup) -> (1,50,s1,"setup updated by update_bal1_tg") step update_bal1_tg: UPDATE target_tg t SET balance = 50, val = t.val || ' updated by update_bal1_tg' WHERE t.key = 1; step merge_bal_tg: - MERGE INTO target_tg t - USING (SELECT 1 as key) s - ON s.key = t.key - WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 100 THEN - UPDATE SET balance = balance * 2, val = t.val || ' when1' - WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 200 THEN - UPDATE SET balance = balance * 4, val = t.val || ' when2' - WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 300 THEN - UPDATE SET balance = balance * 8, val = t.val || ' when3'; + WITH t AS ( + MERGE INTO target_tg t + USING (SELECT 1 as key) s + ON s.key = t.key + WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 100 THEN + UPDATE SET balance = balance * 2, val = t.val || ' when1' + WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 200 THEN + UPDATE SET balance = balance * 4, val = t.val || ' when2' + WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 300 THEN + UPDATE SET balance = balance * 8, val = t.val || ' when3' + RETURNING t.* + ) + SELECT * FROM t; <waiting ...> step c2: COMMIT; s1: NOTICE: Update: (1,50,s1,"setup updated by update_bal1_tg") -> (1,100,s1,"setup updated by update_bal1_tg when1") step merge_bal_tg: <... completed> +key|balance|status|val +---+-------+------+------------------------------------- + 1| 100|s1 |setup updated by update_bal1_tg when1 +(1 row) + step select1_tg: SELECT * FROM target_tg; key|balance|status|val ---+-------+------+------------------------------------- diff --git a/src/test/isolation/specs/merge-match-recheck.spec b/src/test/isolation/specs/merge-match-recheck.spec index 298b2bfdcd6..22688bb6355 100644 --- a/src/test/isolation/specs/merge-match-recheck.spec +++ b/src/test/isolation/specs/merge-match-recheck.spec @@ -99,15 +99,19 @@ step "merge_bal_pa" } step "merge_bal_tg" { - MERGE INTO target_tg t - USING (SELECT 1 as key) s - ON s.key = t.key - WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 100 THEN - UPDATE SET balance = balance * 2, val = t.val || ' when1' - WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 200 THEN - UPDATE SET balance = balance * 4, val = t.val || ' when2' - WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 300 THEN - UPDATE SET balance = balance * 8, val = t.val || ' when3'; + WITH t AS ( + MERGE INTO target_tg t + USING (SELECT 1 as key) s + ON s.key = t.key + WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 100 THEN + UPDATE SET balance = balance * 2, val = t.val || ' when1' + WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 200 THEN + UPDATE SET balance = balance * 4, val = t.val || ' when2' + WHEN MATCHED AND balance < 300 THEN + UPDATE SET balance = balance * 8, val = t.val || ' when3' + RETURNING t.* + ) + SELECT * FROM t; } step "merge_delete" |