summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/include/access
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Korotkov2024-03-30 20:39:03 +0000
committerAlexander Korotkov2024-03-30 20:53:56 +0000
commitb1484a3f1910bfd0e254afe40085dfc3351bda8c (patch)
tree329e9e84dba07d2b85487c4acb5ebb975836947b /src/include/access
parentc95c25f9af4bc77f2f66a587735c50da08c12b37 (diff)
Let table AM insertion methods control index insertion
Previously, the executor did index insert unconditionally after calling table AM interface methods tuple_insert() and multi_insert(). This commit introduces the new parameter insert_indexes for these two methods. Setting '*insert_indexes' to true saves the current logic. Setting it to false indicates that table AM cares about index inserts itself and doesn't want the caller to do that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Matthias van de Meent, Mark Dilger
Diffstat (limited to 'src/include/access')
-rw-r--r--src/include/access/heapam.h2
-rw-r--r--src/include/access/tableam.h25
2 files changed, 19 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/include/access/heapam.h b/src/include/access/heapam.h
index 91fbc950343..32a3fbce961 100644
--- a/src/include/access/heapam.h
+++ b/src/include/access/heapam.h
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ extern void heap_insert(Relation relation, HeapTuple tup, CommandId cid,
int options, BulkInsertState bistate);
extern void heap_multi_insert(Relation relation, struct TupleTableSlot **slots,
int ntuples, CommandId cid, int options,
- BulkInsertState bistate);
+ BulkInsertState bistate, bool *insert_indexes);
extern TM_Result heap_delete(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid,
CommandId cid, Snapshot crosscheck, int options,
struct TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart,
diff --git a/src/include/access/tableam.h b/src/include/access/tableam.h
index cf68ec48ebf..cf76fc29d4b 100644
--- a/src/include/access/tableam.h
+++ b/src/include/access/tableam.h
@@ -512,7 +512,8 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
/* see table_tuple_insert() for reference about parameters */
TupleTableSlot *(*tuple_insert) (Relation rel, TupleTableSlot *slot,
CommandId cid, int options,
- struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate);
+ struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate,
+ bool *insert_indexes);
/* see table_tuple_insert_speculative() for reference about parameters */
void (*tuple_insert_speculative) (Relation rel,
@@ -530,7 +531,8 @@ typedef struct TableAmRoutine
/* see table_multi_insert() for reference about parameters */
void (*multi_insert) (Relation rel, TupleTableSlot **slots, int nslots,
- CommandId cid, int options, struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate);
+ CommandId cid, int options, struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate,
+ bool *insert_indexes);
/* see table_tuple_delete() for reference about parameters */
TM_Result (*tuple_delete) (Relation rel,
@@ -1384,6 +1386,12 @@ table_index_delete_tuples(Relation rel, TM_IndexDeleteOp *delstate)
* behavior) is also just passed through to RelationGetBufferForTuple. If
* `bistate` is provided, table_finish_bulk_insert() needs to be called.
*
+ * The table AM's implementation of tuple_insert should set `*insert_indexes`
+ * to true if it expects the caller to insert the relevant index tuples
+ * (as heap table AM does). It should set `*insert_indexes` to false if
+ * it cares about index inserts itself and doesn't want the caller to do
+ * index inserts.
+ *
* Returns the slot containing the inserted tuple, which may differ from the
* given slot. For instance, the source slot may be VirtualTupleTableSlot, but
* the result slot may correspond to the table AM. On return the slot's
@@ -1393,10 +1401,11 @@ table_index_delete_tuples(Relation rel, TM_IndexDeleteOp *delstate)
*/
static inline TupleTableSlot *
table_tuple_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot *slot, CommandId cid,
- int options, struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate)
+ int options, struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate,
+ bool *insert_indexes)
{
return rel->rd_tableam->tuple_insert(rel, slot, cid, options,
- bistate);
+ bistate, insert_indexes);
}
/*
@@ -1448,10 +1457,11 @@ table_tuple_complete_speculative(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot *slot,
*/
static inline void
table_multi_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot **slots, int nslots,
- CommandId cid, int options, struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate)
+ CommandId cid, int options, struct BulkInsertStateData *bistate,
+ bool *insert_indexes)
{
rel->rd_tableam->multi_insert(rel, slots, nslots,
- cid, options, bistate);
+ cid, options, bistate, insert_indexes);
}
/*
@@ -2096,7 +2106,8 @@ table_scan_sample_next_tuple(TableScanDesc scan,
* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
-extern void simple_table_tuple_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot *slot);
+extern void simple_table_tuple_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot *slot,
+ bool *insert_indexes);
extern void simple_table_tuple_delete(Relation rel, ItemPointer tid,
Snapshot snapshot,
TupleTableSlot *oldSlot);