diff options
author | Richard Guo | 2025-07-03 01:57:26 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Guo | 2025-07-03 01:57:26 +0000 |
commit | 0da29e4cb161f78a5ef534b3fb4467756a422e25 (patch) | |
tree | 35c08e6b5d93c05c496d940bfc9593d9e4756576 /src/backend | |
parent | 7b2eb72b1b8ce4279e42848a3978e781ae239355 (diff) |
Enable use of Memoize for ANTI joins
Currently, we do not support Memoize for SEMI and ANTI joins because
nested loop SEMI/ANTI joins do not scan the inner relation to
completion, which prevents Memoize from marking the cache entry as
complete. One might argue that we could mark the cache entry as
complete after fetching the first inner tuple, but that would not be
safe: if the first inner tuple and the current outer tuple do not
satisfy the join clauses, a second inner tuple matching the parameters
would find the cache entry already marked as complete.
However, if the inner side is provably unique, this issue doesn't
arise, since there would be no second matching tuple. That said, this
doesn't help in the case of SEMI joins, because a SEMI join with a
provably unique inner side would already have been reduced to an inner
join by reduce_unique_semijoins.
Therefore, in this patch, we check whether the inner relation is
provably unique for ANTI joins and enable the use of Memoize in such
cases.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48FdLiMNrmJL-g6mDvoQVt0yNyJAqMkv4e2Pk-5GKCZLA@mail.gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 47 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 7aa8f5d799c..ebedc5574ca 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -154,13 +154,17 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, /* * See if the inner relation is provably unique for this outer rel. * - * We have some special cases: for JOIN_SEMI and JOIN_ANTI, it doesn't - * matter since the executor can make the equivalent optimization anyway; - * we need not expend planner cycles on proofs. For JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, we - * must be considering a semijoin whose inner side is not provably unique - * (else reduce_unique_semijoins would've simplified it), so there's no - * point in calling innerrel_is_unique. However, if the LHS covers all of - * the semijoin's min_lefthand, then it's appropriate to set inner_unique + * We have some special cases: for JOIN_SEMI, it doesn't matter since the + * executor can make the equivalent optimization anyway. It also doesn't + * help enable use of Memoize, since a semijoin with a provably unique + * inner side should have been reduced to an inner join in that case. + * Therefore, we need not expend planner cycles on proofs. (For + * JOIN_ANTI, although it doesn't help the executor for the same reason, + * it can benefit Memoize paths.) For JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, we must be + * considering a semijoin whose inner side is not provably unique (else + * reduce_unique_semijoins would've simplified it), so there's no point in + * calling innerrel_is_unique. However, if the LHS covers all of the + * semijoin's min_lefthand, then it's appropriate to set inner_unique * because the path produced by create_unique_path will be unique relative * to the LHS. (If we have an LHS that's only part of the min_lefthand, * that is *not* true.) For JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER, pass JOIN_INNER to avoid @@ -169,12 +173,6 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, switch (jointype) { case JOIN_SEMI: - case JOIN_ANTI: - - /* - * XXX it may be worth proving this to allow a Memoize to be - * considered for Nested Loop Semi/Anti Joins. - */ extra.inner_unique = false; /* well, unproven */ break; case JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER: @@ -715,16 +713,21 @@ get_memoize_path(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *innerrel, return NULL; /* - * Currently we don't do this for SEMI and ANTI joins unless they're - * marked as inner_unique. This is because nested loop SEMI/ANTI joins - * don't scan the inner node to completion, which will mean memoize cannot - * mark the cache entry as complete. - * - * XXX Currently we don't attempt to mark SEMI/ANTI joins as inner_unique - * = true. Should we? See add_paths_to_joinrel() + * Currently we don't do this for SEMI and ANTI joins, because nested loop + * SEMI/ANTI joins don't scan the inner node to completion, which means + * memoize cannot mark the cache entry as complete. Nor can we mark the + * cache entry as complete after fetching the first inner tuple, because + * if that tuple and the current outer tuple don't satisfy the join + * clauses, a second inner tuple that satisfies the parameters would find + * the cache entry already marked as complete. The only exception is when + * the inner relation is provably unique, as in that case, there won't be + * a second matching tuple and we can safely mark the cache entry as + * complete after fetching the first inner tuple. Note that in such + * cases, the SEMI join should have been reduced to an inner join by + * reduce_unique_semijoins. */ - if (!extra->inner_unique && (jointype == JOIN_SEMI || - jointype == JOIN_ANTI)) + if ((jointype == JOIN_SEMI || jointype == JOIN_ANTI) && + !extra->inner_unique) return NULL; /* |