summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane2021-11-08 16:14:56 +0000
committerTom Lane2021-11-08 16:14:56 +0000
commita021a1d2aeba8ce3391f56a070f01db00468da27 (patch)
treecf13ae40f0e27f52dd1170d79df125a74f0d7de9 /doc/src
parent9394fb828998b4e71e4ef95eac6b80acac742835 (diff)
libpq: reject extraneous data after SSL or GSS encryption handshake.
libpq collects up to a bufferload of data whenever it reads data from the socket. When SSL or GSS encryption is requested during startup, any additional data received with the server's yes-or-no reply remained in the buffer, and would be treated as already-decrypted data once the encryption handshake completed. Thus, a man-in-the-middle with the ability to inject data into the TCP connection could stuff some cleartext data into the start of a supposedly encryption-protected database session. This could probably be abused to inject faked responses to the client's first few queries, although other details of libpq's behavior make that harder than it sounds. A different line of attack is to exfiltrate the client's password, or other sensitive data that might be sent early in the session. That has been shown to be possible with a server vulnerable to CVE-2021-23214. To fix, throw a protocol-violation error if the internal buffer is not empty after the encryption handshake. Our thanks to Jacob Champion for reporting this problem. Security: CVE-2021-23222
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src')
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
index c5ce96933be..82f472ed194 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
@@ -1468,6 +1468,20 @@ SELCT 1/0;
</para>
<para>
+ When <acronym>SSL</acronym> encryption can be performed, the server
+ is expected to send only the single <literal>S</literal> byte and then
+ wait for the frontend to initiate an <acronym>SSL</acronym> handshake.
+ If additional bytes are available to read at this point, it likely
+ means that a man-in-the-middle is attempting to perform a
+ buffer-stuffing attack
+ (<ulink url="https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2021-23222/">CVE-2021-23222</ulink>).
+ Frontends should be coded either to read exactly one byte from the
+ socket before turning the socket over to their SSL library, or to
+ treat it as a protocol violation if they find they have read additional
+ bytes.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
An initial SSLRequest can also be used in a connection that is being
opened to send a CancelRequest message.
</para>