diff options
author | Tom Lane | 2011-09-16 08:28:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane | 2011-09-16 08:28:01 +0000 |
commit | b04214f6cf3a39f45579aba5b7e687fa4f44c84b (patch) | |
tree | 39a3c6517b5bca041facfc5fb37ddb4aca9cb1b6 | |
parent | cac73320ef0f35304e2dcade0fe1d32c07cb765f (diff) |
gistendscan() forgot to free so->giststate.
This oversight led to a massive memory leak --- upwards of 10KB per tuple
--- during creation-time verification of an exclusion constraint based on a
GIST index. In most other scenarios it'd just be a leak of 10KB that would
be recovered at end of query, so not too significant; though perhaps the
leak would be noticeable in a situation where a GIST index was being used
in a nestloop inner indexscan. In any case, it's a real leak of long
standing, so patch all supported branches. Per report from Harald Fuchs.
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/access/gist/gistscan.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/gist/gistscan.c b/src/backend/access/gist/gistscan.c index a53d8cd0873..0fa8814e3a5 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/gist/gistscan.c +++ b/src/backend/access/gist/gistscan.c @@ -138,12 +138,15 @@ gistendscan(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { gistfreestack(so->stack); if (so->giststate != NULL) + { freeGISTstate(so->giststate); + pfree(so->giststate); + } /* drop pins on buffers -- we aren't holding any locks */ if (BufferIsValid(so->curbuf)) ReleaseBuffer(so->curbuf); MemoryContextDelete(so->tempCxt); - pfree(scan->opaque); + pfree(so); } PG_RETURN_VOID(); |