diff options
author | Tom Lane | 2021-11-08 16:14:56 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane | 2021-11-08 16:14:56 +0000 |
commit | a021a1d2aeba8ce3391f56a070f01db00468da27 (patch) | |
tree | cf13ae40f0e27f52dd1170d79df125a74f0d7de9 | |
parent | 9394fb828998b4e71e4ef95eac6b80acac742835 (diff) |
libpq: reject extraneous data after SSL or GSS encryption handshake.
libpq collects up to a bufferload of data whenever it reads data from
the socket. When SSL or GSS encryption is requested during startup,
any additional data received with the server's yes-or-no reply
remained in the buffer, and would be treated as already-decrypted data
once the encryption handshake completed. Thus, a man-in-the-middle
with the ability to inject data into the TCP connection could stuff
some cleartext data into the start of a supposedly encryption-protected
database session.
This could probably be abused to inject faked responses to the
client's first few queries, although other details of libpq's behavior
make that harder than it sounds. A different line of attack is to
exfiltrate the client's password, or other sensitive data that might
be sent early in the session. That has been shown to be possible with
a server vulnerable to CVE-2021-23214.
To fix, throw a protocol-violation error if the internal buffer
is not empty after the encryption handshake.
Our thanks to Jacob Champion for reporting this problem.
Security: CVE-2021-23222
-rw-r--r-- | doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml | 14 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c | 13 |
2 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml index c5ce96933be..82f472ed194 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml @@ -1468,6 +1468,20 @@ SELCT 1/0; </para> <para> + When <acronym>SSL</acronym> encryption can be performed, the server + is expected to send only the single <literal>S</literal> byte and then + wait for the frontend to initiate an <acronym>SSL</acronym> handshake. + If additional bytes are available to read at this point, it likely + means that a man-in-the-middle is attempting to perform a + buffer-stuffing attack + (<ulink url="https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2021-23222/">CVE-2021-23222</ulink>). + Frontends should be coded either to read exactly one byte from the + socket before turning the socket over to their SSL library, or to + treat it as a protocol violation if they find they have read additional + bytes. + </para> + + <para> An initial SSLRequest can also be used in a connection that is being opened to send a CancelRequest message. </para> diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c index 457d5c12447..19318ad4870 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c @@ -2720,6 +2720,19 @@ keep_going: /* We will come back to here until there is pollres = pqsecure_open_client(conn); if (pollres == PGRES_POLLING_OK) { + /* + * At this point we should have no data already buffered. + * If we do, it was received before we performed the SSL + * handshake, so it wasn't encrypted and indeed may have + * been injected by a man-in-the-middle. + */ + if (conn->inCursor != conn->inEnd) + { + appendPQExpBufferStr(&conn->errorMessage, + libpq_gettext("received unencrypted data after SSL response\n")); + goto error_return; + } + /* SSL handshake done, ready to send startup packet */ conn->status = CONNECTION_MADE; return PGRES_POLLING_WRITING; |