diff options
| author | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-05-19 16:21:46 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-05-19 16:26:02 +0000 |
| commit | 58b2cf033daa164cba0e16738273aea46e6a7d12 (patch) | |
| tree | 9e58cdd4c91fa86a7f5032133f93b59d69787377 | |
| parent | 97ff2a5645227d73c222373832ffb3bf9470ca73 (diff) | |
Fix off-by-one error in Assertion.
The point of the assertion is to ensure that the arrays allocated in stack
are large enough, but the check was one item short.
This won't matter in practice because MaxIndexTuplesPerPage is an
overestimate, so you can't have that many items on a page in reality.
But let's be tidy.
Spotted by Anastasia Lubennikova. Backpatch to all supported versions, like
the patch that added the assertion.
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c b/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c index eb09722e8c2..b99e6a82059 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ PageIndexMultiDelete(Page page, OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems) int nextitm; OffsetNumber offnum; - Assert(nitems < MaxIndexTuplesPerPage); + Assert(nitems <= MaxIndexTuplesPerPage); /* * If there aren't very many items to delete, then retail |