diff options
author | Thomas Munro | 2019-06-27 23:11:26 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Munro | 2019-06-28 05:17:23 +0000 |
commit | 0908c5ecf0833b020b0d95183804ebc22bb6ea6c (patch) | |
tree | 42f75ee37226ad958738673b125301d716adb723 | |
parent | 30e1b395c9cfee997c9f44cfb27c3c6ec06b5a25 (diff) |
Fix misleading comment in nodeIndexonlyscan.c.
The stated reason for acquiring predicate locks on heap pages hasn't
existed since commit c01262a8, so fix the comment. Perhaps in a later
release we'll also be able to change the code to use tuple locks.
Back-patch all the way.
Reviewed-by: Ashwin Agrawal
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D2GK3FVdnt5V3d%2Bh9njWipCv_fNL%3DwjxyUhzsF%3D0PcbNg%40mail.gmail.com
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c index 4f6f91c8dba..24a718d5366 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c @@ -179,11 +179,8 @@ IndexOnlyNext(IndexOnlyScanState *node) errmsg("lossy distance functions are not supported in index-only scans"))); /* - * Predicate locks for index-only scans must be acquired at the page - * level when the heap is not accessed, since tuple-level predicate - * locks need the tuple's xmin value. If we had to visit the tuple - * anyway, then we already have the tuple-level lock and can skip the - * page lock. + * If we didn't access the heap, then we'll need to take a predicate + * lock explicitly, as if we had. For now we do that at page level. */ if (tuple == NULL) PredicateLockPage(scandesc->heapRelation, |