Accept plan changes in aggregates regression test

The plan changes come from the upstream, and XL only adds Remote Fast
Query Execution at the top.

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/aggregates.out b/src/test/regress/expected/aggregates.out
index e428dcfb44..55aa5ce945 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/aggregates.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/aggregates.out
@@ -989,33 +989,35 @@ explain (costs off) select a,c from t1 group by a,c,d;
 explain (costs off) select *
 from t1 inner join t2 on t1.a = t2.x and t1.b = t2.y
 group by t1.a,t1.b,t1.c,t1.d,t2.x,t2.y,t2.z;
-                         QUERY PLAN                          
--------------------------------------------------------------
+                         QUERY PLAN                         
+------------------------------------------------------------
  Remote Fast Query Execution
    Node/s: datanode_1, datanode_2
-   ->  Group
+   ->  HashAggregate
          Group Key: t1.a, t1.b, t2.x, t2.y
-         ->  Merge Join
-               Merge Cond: ((t1.a = t2.x) AND (t1.b = t2.y))
-               ->  Index Scan using t1_pkey on t1
-               ->  Index Scan using t2_pkey on t2
-(8 rows)
+         ->  Hash Join
+               Hash Cond: ((t2.x = t1.a) AND (t2.y = t1.b))
+               ->  Seq Scan on t2
+               ->  Hash
+                     ->  Seq Scan on t1
+(9 rows)
 
 -- Test case where t1 can be optimized but not t2
 explain (costs off) select t1.*,t2.x,t2.z
 from t1 inner join t2 on t1.a = t2.x and t1.b = t2.y
 group by t1.a,t1.b,t1.c,t1.d,t2.x,t2.z;
-                         QUERY PLAN                          
--------------------------------------------------------------
+                         QUERY PLAN                         
+------------------------------------------------------------
  Remote Fast Query Execution
    Node/s: datanode_1, datanode_2
    ->  HashAggregate
          Group Key: t1.a, t1.b, t2.x, t2.z
-         ->  Merge Join
-               Merge Cond: ((t1.a = t2.x) AND (t1.b = t2.y))
-               ->  Index Scan using t1_pkey on t1
-               ->  Index Scan using t2_pkey on t2
-(8 rows)
+         ->  Hash Join
+               Hash Cond: ((t2.x = t1.a) AND (t2.y = t1.b))
+               ->  Seq Scan on t2
+               ->  Hash
+                     ->  Seq Scan on t1
+(9 rows)
 
 -- Cannot optimize when PK is deferrable
 explain (costs off) select * from t3 group by a,b,c;