Update clarification around license FAQ

This consolidates two redundant-ish sections in the FAQ portion
of the license page, since both effectively said the same thing.

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/templates/pages/about/licence.html b/templates/pages/about/licence.html
index 880e9c2b..3dfdc2d3 100644
--- a/templates/pages/about/licence.html
+++ b/templates/pages/about/licence.html
@@ -36,25 +36,17 @@ a liberal Open Source license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses.</p>
   PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.
 </p>
 
-<h2>Why not the GNU General Public License?</h2>
-
-<p>
-  People often ask why PostgreSQL is not released under the <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GNU General
-Public License</a>. The simple answer is: we like our license and do not
-want to change it!
-</p>
-<p>
-  If you would like to read more about this topic, then please
-take a look at the <a href="/list/">mailing list archives</a> at
-one of the many discussions on this subject.
-</p>
-
 <h2>Will PostgreSQL ever be released under a different license?</h2>
+
 <p>
   The PostgreSQL Global Development Group remains committed to making
   PostgreSQL available as free and open source software in perpetuity. There are
   no plans to change the PostgreSQL License or release PostgreSQL under a
   different license.
 </p>
-
+<p>
+  If you would like to read more about this topic, then please take a look at
+  the <a href="/list/">mailing list archives</a> at one of the many discussions
+  on this subject.
+</p>
 {%endblock%}