Modeling feature variants and optional dependencies
Gradle supports the concept of feature variants: when building a library, it’s often the case that some features should only be available when some dependencies are present, or when special artifacts are used.
Feature variants let consumers choose what features of a library they need: the dependency management engine will select the right artifacts and dependencies.
This allows for a number of different scenarios (list is non-exhaustive):
-
a (better) substitute for Maven optional dependencies
-
a main library is built with support for different mutually-exclusive implementations of runtime features; the user must choose one, and only one, implementation of each such feature
-
a main library is built with support for optional runtime features, each of which requires a different set of dependencies
-
a main library comes with secondary variants like test fixtures
-
a main library comes with a main artifact, and enabling an additional feature requires additional artifacts
Selection of feature variants and capabilities
Declaring a dependency on a component is usually done by providing a set of coordinates (group, artifact, version also known as GAV coordinates). This allows the engine to determine the component we’re looking for, but such a component may provide different variants. A variant is typically chosen based on the usage. For example, we might choose a different variant for compiling against a component (in which case we need the API of the component) or when executing code (in which case we need the runtime of the component). All variants of a component provide a number of capabilities, which are denoted similarly using GAV coordinates.
A capability is denoted by GAV coordinates, but you must think of it as feature description:
And in general, having two components that provide the same thing in the graph is a problem (they conflict). |
This is an important concept because:
-
by default a variant provides a capability corresponding to the GAV coordinates of its component
-
it is not allowed to have different components or different variants of a component in a dependency graph if they provide the same capability
-
it is allowed to select two variants of the same component, as long as they provide different capabilities
A typical component will only provide variants with the default capability. A Java library, for example, exposes two variants (API and runtime) which provide the same capability. As a consequence, it is an error to have both the API and runtime of a single component in a dependency graph.
However, imagine that you need the runtime and the test fixtures of a component. Then it is allowed as long as the runtime and test fixtures variant of the library declare different capabilities.
If we do so, a consumer would then have to declare two dependencies:
-
one on the "main" variant, the library
-
one on the "test fixtures" variant, by requiring its capability
While the engine supports feature variants independently of the ecosystem, this feature is currently only available using the Java plugins and is incubating. |
Declaring feature variants
Feature variants can be declared by applying the java
or java-library
plugins.
The following code illustrates how to declare a feature named mongodbSupport
:
group = 'org.gradle.demo'
version = '1.0'
java {
registerFeature('mongodbSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.main)
}
}
group = "org.gradle.demo"
version = "1.0"
java {
registerFeature("mongodbSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["main"])
}
}
Gradle will automatically setup a number of things for you, in a very similar way to how the Java Library Plugin sets up configurations:
-
the configuration
mongodbSupportApi
, used to declare API dependencies for this feature -
the configuration
mongodbSupportImplementation
, used to declare implementation dependencies for this feature -
the configuration
mongodbSupportApiElements
, used by consumers to fetch the artifacts and API dependencies of this feature -
the configuration
mongodbSupportRuntimeElements
, used by consumers to fetch the artifacts and runtime dependencies of this feature
Most users will only need to care about the first two configurations, to declare the specific dependencies of this feature:
dependencies {
mongodbSupportImplementation 'org.mongodb:mongodb-driver-sync:3.9.1'
}
dependencies {
"mongodbSupportImplementation"("org.mongodb:mongodb-driver-sync:3.9.1")
}
By convention, Gradle maps the feature name to a capability whose group and version are the same as the group and version of the main component, respectively, but whose name is the main component name followed by a For example, if the group is If you choose the capability name yourself or add more capabilities to a variant, it is recommended to follow the same convention. |
Feature variant source set
In the previous example, we’re declaring a feature variant which uses the main source set. This is a typical use case in the Java ecosystem, where it’s, for whatever reason, not possible to split the sources of a project into different subprojects or different source sets. Gradle will therefore declare the configurations as described, but will also setup the compile classpath and runtime classpath of the main source set so that it extends from the feature configuration. Said differently, this allows you to declare the dependencies specific to a feature in their own "bucket", but everything is still compiled as a single source set. There will also be a single artifact (the component Jar) including support for all features.
However, it is often preferred to have a separate source set for a feature. Gradle will then perform a similar mapping, but will not make the compile and runtime classpath of the main component extend from the dependencies of the registered features.
It will also, by convention, create a Jar
task to bundle the classes built from this feature source set, using a classifier corresponding to the kebab-case name of the feature:
sourceSets {
mongodbSupport {
java {
srcDir 'src/mongodb/java'
}
}
}
java {
registerFeature('mongodbSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.mongodbSupport)
}
}
sourceSets {
create("mongodbSupport") {
java {
srcDir("src/mongodb/java")
}
}
}
java {
registerFeature("mongodbSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["mongodbSupport"])
}
}
Publishing feature variants
Depending on the metadata file format, publishing feature variants may be lossy:
|
Publishing feature variants is supported using the maven-publish
and ivy-publish
plugins only.
The Java Plugin (or Java Library Plugin) will take care of registering the additional variants for you, so there’s no additional configuration required, only the regular publications:
plugins {
id 'java-library'
id 'maven-publish'
}
// ...
publishing {
publications {
myLibrary(MavenPublication) {
from components.java
}
}
}
plugins {
`java-library`
`maven-publish`
}
// ...
publishing {
publications {
create("myLibrary", MavenPublication::class.java) {
from(components["java"])
}
}
}
Adding javadoc and sources JARs
Similar to the main Javadoc and sources JARs, you can configure the added feature variant so that it produces JARs for the Javadoc and sources. This however only makes sense when using a source set other than the main one.
java {
registerFeature('mongodbSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.mongodbSupport)
withJavadocJar()
withSourcesJar()
}
}
java {
registerFeature("mongodbSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["mongodbSupport"])
withJavadocJar()
withSourcesJar()
}
}
Dependencies on feature variants
As mentioned earlier, feature variants can be lossy when published. As a consequence, a consumer can depend on a feature variant only in these cases:
|
A consumer can specify that it needs a specific feature of a producer by declaring required capabilities. For example, if a producer declares a "MySQL support" feature like this:
java {
registerFeature('mysqlSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.main)
}
}
dependencies {
mysqlSupportImplementation 'mysql:mysql-connector-java:8.0.14'
}
java {
registerFeature("mysqlSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["main"])
}
}
dependencies {
"mysqlSupportImplementation"("mysql:mysql-connector-java:8.0.14")
}
Then the consumer can declare a dependency on the MySQL support feature by doing this:
dependencies {
// This project requires the main producer component
implementation(project(":producer"))
// But we also want to use its MySQL support
runtimeOnly(project(":producer")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-mysql-support")
}
}
}
dependencies {
// This project requires the main producer component
implementation(project(":producer"))
// But we also want to use its MySQL support
runtimeOnly(project(":producer")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-mysql-support")
}
}
}
This will automatically bring the mysql-connector-java
dependency on the runtime classpath.
If there were more than one dependency, all of them would be brought, meaning that a feature can be used to group dependencies which contribute to a feature together.
Similarly, if an external library with feature variants was published with Gradle Module Metadata, it is possible to depend on a feature provided by that library:
dependencies {
// This project requires the main producer component
implementation('org.gradle.demo:producer:1.0')
// But we also want to use its MongoDB support
runtimeOnly('org.gradle.demo:producer:1.0') {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-mongodb-support")
}
}
}
dependencies {
// This project requires the main producer component
implementation("org.gradle.demo:producer:1.0")
// But we also want to use its MongoDB support
runtimeOnly("org.gradle.demo:producer:1.0") {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-mongodb-support")
}
}
}
Handling mutually exclusive variants
The main advantage of using capabilities as a way to handle features is that you can precisely handle compatibility of variants. The rule is simple:
It’s not allowed to have two variants of components that provide the same capability in a single dependency graph.
We can leverage that to ask Gradle to fail whenever the user mis-configures dependencies. Imagine, for example, that your library supports MySQL, Postgres and MongoDB, but that it’s only allowed to choose one of those at the same time. Not allowed should directly translate to "provide the same capability", so there must be a capability provided by all three features:
java {
registerFeature('mysqlSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.main)
capability('org.gradle.demo', 'producer-db-support', '1.0')
capability('org.gradle.demo', 'producer-mysql-support', '1.0')
}
registerFeature('postgresSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.main)
capability('org.gradle.demo', 'producer-db-support', '1.0')
capability('org.gradle.demo', 'producer-postgres-support', '1.0')
}
registerFeature('mongoSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.main)
capability('org.gradle.demo', 'producer-db-support', '1.0')
capability('org.gradle.demo', 'producer-mongo-support', '1.0')
}
}
dependencies {
mysqlSupportImplementation 'mysql:mysql-connector-java:8.0.14'
postgresSupportImplementation 'org.postgresql:postgresql:42.2.5'
mongoSupportImplementation 'org.mongodb:mongodb-driver-sync:3.9.1'
}
java {
registerFeature("mysqlSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["main"])
capability("org.gradle.demo", "producer-db-support", "1.0")
capability("org.gradle.demo", "producer-mysql-support", "1.0")
}
registerFeature("postgresSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["main"])
capability("org.gradle.demo", "producer-db-support", "1.0")
capability("org.gradle.demo", "producer-postgres-support", "1.0")
}
registerFeature("mongoSupport") {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets["main"])
capability("org.gradle.demo", "producer-db-support", "1.0")
capability("org.gradle.demo", "producer-mongo-support", "1.0")
}
}
dependencies {
"mysqlSupportImplementation"("mysql:mysql-connector-java:8.0.14")
"postgresSupportImplementation"("org.postgresql:postgresql:42.2.5")
"mongoSupportImplementation"("org.mongodb:mongodb-driver-sync:3.9.1")
}
Here, the producer declares 3 variants, one for each database runtime support:
-
mysql-support
provides both thedb-support
andmysql-support
capabilities -
postgres-support
provides both thedb-support
andpostgres-support
capabilities -
mongo-support
provides both thedb-support
andmongo-support
capabilities
Then if the consumer tries to get both the postgres-support
and mysql-support
like this (this also works transitively):
dependencies {
implementation(project(":producer"))
// Let's try to ask for both MySQL and Postgres support
runtimeOnly(project(":producer")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-mysql-support")
}
}
runtimeOnly(project(":producer")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-postgres-support")
}
}
}
dependencies {
// This project requires the main producer component
implementation(project(":producer"))
// Let's try to ask for both MySQL and Postgres support
runtimeOnly(project(":producer")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-mysql-support")
}
}
runtimeOnly(project(":producer")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("org.gradle.demo:producer-postgres-support")
}
}
}
Dependency resolution would fail with the following error:
Cannot choose between org.gradle.demo:producer:1.0 variant mysqlSupportRuntimeElements and org.gradle.demo:producer:1.0 variant postgresSupportRuntimeElements because they provide the same capability: org.gradle.demo:producer-db-support:1.0