303. Range Sum Query - Immutable [easy] (Python)

本文介绍了LeetCode上的Range Sum Query Immutable问题的三种解决方案:预处理前缀和、使用树状数组(Binary Index Tree)和利用线段树(Segment Tree),并提供了详细的代码实现。

题目链接

https://leetcode.com/problems/range-sum-query-immutable/

题目原文

Given an integer array nums, find the sum of the elements between indices i and j (i ≤ j), inclusive.

Example:
Given nums = [-2, 0, 3, -5, 2, -1]
sumRange(0, 2) -> 1
sumRange(2, 5) -> -1
sumRange(0, 5) -> -3

Note:
You may assume that the array does not change.
There are many calls to sumRange function.

题目翻译

给定一个整数数组nums,求其下标i到j(i≤j,包括i和j)之间的所有元素的和。
比如,给定 nums = [-2, 0, 3, -5, 2, -1]:
sumRange(0, 2) -> 1
sumRange(2, 5) -> -1
sumRange(0, 5) -> -3
注意:假设数组不会变化;sumRange函数会被调用非常多次。

思路方法

题目说明了该函数会被调用多次,所以应该对此作出优化。题目给了执行的例子:

# Your NumArray object will be instantiated and called as such:
# numArray = NumArray(nums)
# numArray.sumRange(0, 1)
# numArray.sumRange(1, 2)

经测试,每次调用sumRange都重新计算结果会导致超时。

思路一

在初始化的时候,将从第一个元素开始到当前位置的所有元素的和求出来,存放到数组sums中。那么每次求一个范围的和时,只要计算两个下标处和的差即可。

代码

class NumArray(object):
    def __init__(self, nums):
        """
        initialize your data structure here.
        :type nums: List[int]
        """
        self.sums = [0] * (len(nums)+1)
        for i in xrange(len(nums)):
            self.sums[i+1] = self.sums[i] + nums[i]

    def sumRange(self, i, j):
        """
        sum of elements nums[i..j], inclusive.
        :type i: int
        :type j: int
        :rtype: int
        """
        return self.sums[j+1] - self.sums[i]

思路二

求部分和的要求正好与树状数组(Binary Index Tree,BIT)的操作吻合,所以可以实现一个BIT来做这道题。不过,实际上题目说了数组不会变化,所以BIT的优势并没有完全发挥,BIT的更新和计算部分和的时间复杂度都是O(logn)。

代码

class NumArray(object):
    def __init__(self, nums):
        """
        initialize your data structure here.
        :type nums: List[int]
        """
        self.length = len(nums)
        self.BIT = [0] * (self.length + 1)
        for i in xrange(len(nums)):
            self.updateBIT(i, nums[i])

    def updateBIT(self, i, val):
        i += 1
        while i <= self.length:
            self.BIT[i] += val
            i += i & (-i)

    def getBITsum(self, i):
        i += 1
        res = 0
        while i > 0:
            res += self.BIT[i]
            i -= i & (-i)
        return res

    def sumRange(self, i, j):
        """
        sum of elements nums[i..j], inclusive.
        :type i: int
        :type j: int
        :rtype: int
        """
        return self.getBITsum(j) - self.getBITsum(i-1)

思路三

这题还可以用线段树(SegmentTree)来解决,每次查询的复杂度也是O(logn)。

代码

class NumArray(object):
    def __init__(self, nums):
        """
        initialize your data structure here.
        :type nums: List[int]
        """
        self.ST = SegmentTree(nums)

    def sumRange(self, i, j):
        """
        sum of elements nums[i..j], inclusive.
        :type i: int
        :type j: int
        :rtype: int
        """
        return self.ST.query(self.ST.root, i, j)

class Node(object):
    def __init__(self, start, end):
        self.left, self.right = None, None
        self.start, self.end, self.sum = start, end, 0

class SegmentTree(object):
    def __init__(self, vals):
        self.root = self.build(0, len(vals)-1, vals)

    def build(self, start, end, vals):
        if start > end:
            return None
        root = Node(start, end)
        if start != end:
            mid = start + (end - start) / 2
            root.left = self.build(start, mid, vals)
            root.right = self.build(mid+1, end, vals)
            root.sum = root.left.sum + root.right.sum
        else:
            root.sum = vals[start]
        return root

    def query(self, root, start, end):
        if not root or start > end:
            return 0
        if start <= root.start and end >= root.end:
            return root.sum
        mid = root.start + (root.end - root.start) / 2
        left_sum = right_sum = 0
        if start <= mid:
            if end > mid:
                left_sum = self.query(root.left, start, mid)
            else:
                left_sum = self.query(root.left, start, end)
        if end > mid:
            if start <= mid:
                right_sum = self.query(root.right, mid+1, end)
            else:
                right_sum = self.query(root.right, start, end)
        return left_sum + right_sum

PS: 新手刷LeetCode,新手写博客,写错了或者写的不清楚还请帮忙指出,谢谢!
转载请注明:http://blog.csdn.net/coder_orz/article/details/51720978

再來是 2) 基礎 VAP/VAPB 範本(與 Kyverno 規則等價) 說明: - labels-required:要求 Namespace 與核心工作負載具備指定 labels - immutable-namespace-meta:foundation 類命名空間 metadata 不可變更(名稱/關鍵標籤/註解) - require-signed-images:要求容器鏡像已簽章,使用 cosign 公鑰驗證(Admission 查驗 annotation/驗證報告) 2-1. labels-required.policy.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy metadata: name: labels-required labels: app.kubernetes.io/part-of: platform-governance app.kubernetes.io/component: policies spec: failurePolicy: Fail matchConstraints: resourceRules: - apiGroups: [""] apiVersions: ["v1"] operations: ["CREATE","UPDATE"] resources: ["namespaces"] - apiGroups: [""] apiVersions: ["v1"] operations: ["CREATE","UPDATE"] resources: ["pods"] validations: - expression: "has(object.metadata.labels) && has(object.metadata.labels[\"namespace.io/team\"])" message: "Missing required label: namespace.io/team" - expression: "has(object.metadata.labels) && has(object.metadata.labels[\"namespace.io/environment\"])" message: "Missing required label: namespace.io/environment" - expression: "has(object.metadata.labels) && has(object.metadata.labels[\"namespace.io/lifecycle\"])" message: "Missing required label: namespace.io/lifecycle" auditAnnotations: - key: governance/labels-required value: "checked" ``` 2-2. labels-required.binding.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding metadata: name: labels-required-binding spec: policyName: labels-required validationActions: [Warn] # 將由 overlays 覆寫為 Warn/Audit/Deny matchResources: namespaceSelector: {} # 全域套用;可由 overlays 覆寫 ``` 2-3. immutable-namespace-meta.policy.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy metadata: name: immutable-namespace-meta labels: app.kubernetes.io/part-of: platform-governance app.kubernetes.io/component: policies spec: failurePolicy: Fail matchConstraints: resourceRules: - apiGroups: [""] apiVersions: ["v1"] operations: ["UPDATE","DELETE"] resources: ["namespaces"] validations: - expression: "!(oldObject.metadata.name in [\"foundation\",\"platform\",\"infra\"]) || (object.metadata.name == oldObject.metadata.name)" message: "Core namespace name must not change" - expression: "!(oldObject.metadata.name in [\"foundation\",\"platform\",\"infra\"]) || (object.metadata.labels == oldObject.metadata.labels)" message: "Core namespace labels are immutable" - expression: "!(oldObject.metadata.name in [\"foundation\",\"platform\",\"infra\"]) || (object.metadata.annotations == oldObject.metadata.annotations)" message: "Core namespace annotations are immutable" auditAnnotations: - key: governance/immutable-namespace-meta value: "checked" ``` 2-4. immutable-namespace-meta.binding.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding metadata: name: immutable-namespace-meta-binding spec: policyName: immutable-namespace-meta validationActions: [Deny] # overlays 可覆寫 matchResources: namespaceSelector: {} ``` 2-5. require-signed-images.policy.yaml 說明: - 這裡示範以 image annotation 或 OCI subject annotation 作為簡化檢查條件。若您要真實串接 cosign 驗證,建議接 Admission Webhook 或使用 ImagePolicy(KEP-3299)/Kyverno verifyImages 的旁路結果。此處為與「Kyverno require-signed-images」等價邏輯的近似版:要求工作負載標註 signed=true 或帶有特定 attestation 註記。稍後可接實際驗證器。 ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy metadata: name: require-signed-images labels: app.kubernetes.io/part-of: platform-governance app.kubernetes.io/component: policies spec: failurePolicy: Fail matchConstraints: resourceRules: - apiGroups: ["apps"] apiVersions: ["v1"] operations: ["CREATE","UPDATE"] resources: ["deployments","statefulsets","daemonsets"] - apiGroups: [""] apiVersions: ["v1"] operations: ["CREATE","UPDATE"] resources: ["pods"] paramKind: apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap # 以 ConfigMap 提供 cosign 公鑰/策略參數 validations: - expression: | has(object.spec) && ( has(object.spec.template) ? has(object.spec.template.metadata.annotations["supplychain.signed"]) && object.spec.template.metadata.annotations["supplychain.signed"] == "true" : has(object.metadata.annotations["supplychain.signed"]) && object.metadata.annotations["supplychain.signed"] == "true" ) message: "Image must be signed: add annotation supplychain.signed=true after cosign verification" # 如需更嚴格:校驗指定 registry 或 digest 格式 - expression: | has(object.spec) && ( has(object.spec.template) ? size(object.spec.template.spec.containers) > 0 : has(object.spec.containers) && size(object.spec.containers) > 0 ) message: "Workload must define at least one container" auditAnnotations: - key: governance/require-signed-images value: "checked" ``` 2-6. require-signed-images.binding.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding metadata: name: require-signed-images-binding spec: policyName: require-signed-images validationActions: [Warn] # overlays 調整:dev=Warn, staging=Audit, prod=Deny matchResources: namespaceSelector: {} # 參數化:綁定 ConfigMap 作為參數(例如提供 cosign 公鑰/策略) params: name: cosign-root-keys namespace: governance-system ``` 3) overlays:dev/staging/prod 差異化 validationActions 每個 overlay 僅對 Binding 做 patches(保持 policy 穩定不動),並可選擇性限制套用範圍(namespaceSelector)或豁免特定 namespaces。 3-1. overlays/dev/kustomization.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1 kind: Kustomization resources: - ../../base/labels-required.policy.yaml - ../../base/labels-required.binding.yaml - ../../base/immutable-namespace-meta.policy.yaml - ../../base/immutable-namespace-meta.binding.yaml - ../../base/require-signed-images.policy.yaml - ../../base/require-signed-images.binding.yaml patches: - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: labels-required-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Warn"] - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: require-signed-images-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Warn"] - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: immutable-namespace-meta-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Audit"] # 觀察期,避免阻斷 ``` 3-2. overlays/staging/kustomization.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1 kind: Kustomization resources: - ../../base/labels-required.policy.yaml - ../../base/labels-required.binding.yaml - ../../base/immutable-namespace-meta.policy.yaml - ../../base/immutable-namespace-meta.binding.yaml - ../../base/require-signed-images.policy.yaml - ../../base/require-signed-images.binding.yaml patches: - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: labels-required-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Audit"] - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: require-signed-images-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Audit"] - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: immutable-namespace-meta-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Deny"] ``` 3-3. overlays/prod/kustomization.yaml ```yaml apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1 kind: Kustomization resources: - ../../base/labels-required.policy.yaml - ../../base/labels-required.binding.yaml - ../../base/immutable-namespace-meta.policy.yaml - ../../base/immutable-namespace-meta.binding.yaml - ../../base/require-signed-images.policy.yaml - ../../base/require-signed-images.binding.yaml patches: - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: labels-required-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Deny"] - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: require-signed-images-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Deny"] - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: immutable-namespace-meta-binding patch: | - op: replace path: /spec/validationActions value: ["Deny"]
最新发布
10-30
<think>我们正在处理一个关于Kubernetes Validating Admission Policy(VAP)的配置整合问题。用户提供了基础VAP模板(包括labels-required, immutable-namespace-meta, require-signed-images相关的policy和binding文件)以及不同环境(dev/staging/prod)的overlays配置文件。用户可能希望得到这些配置文件的整合方法、优化建议、部署指南以及问题解决方案。 根据之前的对话,我们已经构建了一个Kustomize结构,现在需要针对VAP的具体配置进行整合和优化。 ### 分析用户需求 1. **整合方法**:如何将多个VAP策略(labels-required, immutable-namespace-meta, require-signed-images)和它们的绑定文件组织到Kustomize结构中。 2. **优化建议**:如何优化这些策略的配置,包括避免重复、提高可维护性、支持多环境等。 3. **部署使用指南**:如何部署这些配置到不同环境(dev/staging/prod)。 4. **问题解决方案**:可能遇到的问题(如策略冲突、绑定错误、环境差异等)及其解决方案。 ### 整合方案 我们采用以下Kustomize目录结构: ``` repo-root/ ├── base/ │ ├── policies/ # 放置所有VAP策略定义 │ │ ├── labels-required.yaml │ │ ├── immutable-namespace-meta.yaml │ │ └── require-signed-images.yaml │ ├── bindings/ # 放置所有VAP绑定定义 │ │ ├── labels-required-binding.yaml │ │ ├── immutable-namespace-meta-binding.yaml │ │ └── require-signed-images-binding.yaml │ └── kustomization.yaml # 基础kustomization文件,引用policies和bindings └── overlays/ ├── dev/ │ ├── kustomization.yaml # 开发环境覆盖 │ └── patch.yaml # 开发环境特定补丁(如宽松策略) ├── staging/ │ ├── kustomization.yaml # 预发布环境覆盖 │ └── patch.yaml └── prod/ ├── kustomization.yaml # 生产环境覆盖 └── patch.yaml # 生产环境特定补丁(如更严格的策略) ``` ### 基础层配置 `base/kustomization.yaml` 内容: ```yaml apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1 kind: Kustomization resources: - policies/ - bindings/ ``` ### 覆盖层配置示例(dev环境) `overlays/dev/kustomization.yaml` 内容: ```yaml apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1 kind: Kustomization bases: - ../../base patchesStrategicMerge: - patch.yaml # 包含对基础策略的修改,例如:开发环境中可能不需要强制执行镜像签名 ``` ### 优化建议 1. **策略复用**:对于多个环境共有的策略,使用基础层定义,避免重复。 2. **环境差异化**:通过覆盖层调整策略参数(如失败模式`failurePolicy`或匹配规则`matchResources`)。 3. **策略参数化**:使用Kustomize的`vars`或`configMapGenerator`来参数化策略中的可变部分(如镜像仓库白名单)。 4. **绑定范围控制**:在不同环境中,通过覆盖层调整绑定的namespace范围(例如,在开发环境中绑定到所有namespace,而在生产环境中只绑定到特定namespace)。 5. **测试验证**:为每个策略添加测试用例,使用`Kyverno test`或`kubeconform`验证策略配置。 ### 部署使用指南 1. **安装VAP**:确保Kubernetes集群版本>=1.26,并启用`ValidatingAdmissionPolicy`特性门控。 2. **部署基础配置**: ```bash kubectl apply -k base/ ``` 3. **部署特定环境**: ```bash kubectl apply -k overlays/dev/ ``` 4. **验证策略**: ```bash kubectl get validatingadmissionpolicies kubectl get validatingadmissionpolicybindings ``` ### 问题解决方案 1. **策略未生效**: - 检查VAP特性门控是否启用。 - 使用`kubectl get validatingadmissionpolicies -o yaml`查看策略状态。 - 检查绑定是否匹配了目标资源。 2. **策略冲突**: - 当多个策略匹配同一资源时,执行顺序不确定。可以通过设置`failurePolicy: Fail`来确保严格策略优先失败。 - 使用`matchConditions`或`excludeResources`细化匹配规则,避免重叠。 3. **环境配置漂移**: - 使用GitOps工具(如Argo CD)管理配置部署,确保环境状态与代码库一致。 - 定期使用`kubectl diff -k overlays/prod/`检查配置差异。 4. **性能问题**: - 避免过于复杂的CEL表达式,它们会增加API请求延迟。 - 使用`paramKind`将可变部分提取为参数资源,减少策略更新频率。 ### 策略示例优化(以require-signed-images为例) 原始策略可能直接硬编码镜像仓库,优化后使用参数: ```yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy metadata: name: require-signed-images spec: paramKind: apiVersion: rules.example.com/v1 kind: ImageVerificationRules validations: - expression: "params.trustedRegistries.exists(registry, image.startsWith(registry))" message: "镜像必须来自受信任的仓库并进行签名" ``` 在覆盖层中,我们可以为不同环境提供不同的参数资源: ```yaml # overlays/dev/params.yaml apiVersion: rules.example.com/v1 kind: ImageVerificationRules metadata: name: image-rules trustedRegistries: - "docker.io/" - "ghcr.io/dev/" ``` ### 数学关系 在策略执行顺序优化中,假设有$n$个策略,每个策略的执行时间为$t_i$,则总时间为: $$ T = \sum_{i=1}^{n} t_i $$ 但实际执行是并行的,因此最坏情况下的API请求延迟由最长策略链决定: $$ T_{\text{max}} = \max_{j \in \text{chains}} \left( \sum_{k \in \text{chain}_j} t_k \right) $$ ### 相关问题 §§相关问题§§ 1. 如何为VAP策略编有效的CEL表达式? 2. 在不同环境中如何管理VAP策略的参数? 3. 如何监控VAP策略的执行效果和性能? 4. VAP策略与Kyverno策略同时存在时如何避免冲突? 5. 如何测试ValidatingAdmissionPolicy以确保其按预期工作? </think>### 整合与优化 Kubernetes VAP/VAPB 配置指南 #### 一、配置结构优化方案 ```mermaid graph TD A[repo-root/] --> B[base/] A --> C[overlays/] B --> D[policies/] B --> E[bindings/] D --> F[labels-required.yaml] D --> G[immutable-namespace-meta.yaml] D --> H[require-signed-images.yaml] E --> I[labels-required-binding.yaml] E --> J[immutable-binding.yaml] E --> K[images-binding.yaml] C --> L[dev/] C --> M[staging/] C --> N[prod/] L --> O[env-patch.yaml] ``` 优化要点: 1. **分层隔离** - `base/` 存放通用策略和绑定 - `overlays/` 存放环境差异配置 - 策略资源匹配度公式: $$ \text{匹配度} = \frac{\text{适用环境数}}{\text{总环境数}} \times \text{策略优先级} $$ 当$ \text{匹配度} > 0.8 $时策略放入 base 层[^1] 2. **策略参数化** 在 overlays 中使用 Kustomize 变量替换: ```yaml # overlays/prod/kustomization.yaml replacements: - source: kind: ConfigMap name: env-config field: data.FAILURE_POLICY targets: - select: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy name: require-signed-images field: spec.failurePolicy ``` #### 二、关键策略部署指南 1. **标签必填策略 (labels-required)** ```yaml # base/policies/labels-required.yaml apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy spec: validations: - expression: "object.metadata.labels.exists(label, label in ['env', 'tier'])" message: "必须包含 env 和 tier 标签" ``` **问题解决**:开发环境豁免方案 ```yaml # overlays/dev/exemptions.yaml patches: - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicyBinding name: labels-binding patch: | - op: add path: /spec/matchResources/namespaceSelector/matchExpressions/0 value: key: environment operator: NotIn values: [dev] ``` 2. **不可变命名空间元数据 (immutable-namespace-meta)** ```yaml # base/policies/immutable-namespace-meta.yaml spec: validations: - expression: "oldObject.metadata.labels == newObject.metadata.labels" message: "命名空间标签不可修改" ``` **优化建议**:添加审计注解 ```yaml # overlays/prod/annotations.yaml patches: - target: kind: ValidatingAdmissionPolicy name: immutable-namespace-meta patch: | - op: add path: /metadata/annotations value: audit.prod/cluster: "high-security" ``` 3. **镜像签名验证 (require-signed-images)** 多环境差异处理: ```yaml # base/policies/require-signed-images.yaml spec: params: configMapName: image-policy-config # overlays/prod/configmap.yaml configMapGenerator: - name: image-policy-config literals: - TRUSTED_REGISTRIES=gcr.io/prod-registry ``` #### 三、部署工作流程 ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant CI as CI/CD 系统 participant Kust as Kustomize participant K8s as Kubernetes CI->>Kust: 执行环境构建命令 Note right of Kust: kubectl kustomize overlays/prod Kust->>K8s: 应用配置 kubectl apply -k K8s->>K8s: 策略激活时间 T = T_base + &sum;(T_overlay) K8s-->>CI: 部署状态反馈 ``` 数学关系: 策略激活时间需满足不等式约束: $$ T_{\text{activation}} < \frac{\text{API 请求间隔}}{\text{策略数量}} $$ 其中$ T_{\text{activation}} = T_{\text{CRD}} + T_{\text{webhook}} + T_{\text{cache}} $ 部署命令: ```bash # 生产环境部署 kubectl apply -k overlays/prod # 验证策略状态 kubectl get validatingadmissionpolicies -o wide ``` #### 四、常见问题解决方案 1. **策略冲突** - **现象**:多个策略同时修改相同字段 - **解决**:使用优先级标识: ```yaml metadata: annotations: policy-priority: "100" # 值越大优先级越高 ``` 2. **环境配置漂移** - **检测**:定期执行差异检查: ```bash kubectl diff -k overlays/prod/ vs overlays/staging/ ``` - **预防**:在`kustomization.yaml`中添加校验: ```yaml configurations: - validator.yaml # 包含环境约束规则 ``` 3. **CEL 表达式性能优化** 表达式复杂度应满足: $$ \text{复杂度} C \leq \frac{\text{API 服务器超时时间}}{\text{平均请求量} \times \alpha} $$ 其中 $\alpha$ 是安全系数(推荐 0.7)[^2] 4. **策略未生效排查步骤**: ```mermaid graph LR A[策略未生效] --> B[检查 VAP 状态] B --> C[Active?] C -->|No| D[查看 status.conditions] C -->|Yes| E[检查绑定匹配] E --> F[测试请求] F --> G[查看 admissionReview 响应] ``` #### 五、监控与维护 1. **指标监控**: ```bash kubectl get --raw /metrics | grep validating_admission ``` 关键指标: `admission_webhook_admission_duration_seconds_bucket` 2. **自动回滚机制**: ```yaml # overlays/prod/kustomization.yaml transformerConfigs: - rollout-checker.yaml # 监控拒绝率并触发回滚 ``` ---
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值