Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Date
Msg-id 001b01cd4de1$28eb9300$7ac2b900$@kapila@huawei.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> And it doesn't seem right for ResourceOwnerRemember/ForgetLock to have to
accept a NULL owner. I am not sure, if it can ever enter into this flow without resowner as
mentioned in jeff comments  for session level locks. If it cannot enter then it is okay.

> Please take a look to see if I broke something. In you previous mail you agreed with level as ERROR for elog message
in
function ResourceOwnerForgetLock(..) function,    but in your modification you have used PANIC, is there any specific
reason
for it.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks