Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f0511152116s4483af82s91c711b1b902da14@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
List pgsql-performance
Not at random access in RAID 10 they aren't, and anyone with their
head screwed on right is using RAID 10.  The 9500S will still beat the
Areca cards at RAID 10 database access patern.

Alex.

On 11/15/05, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
> Luke,
>
> Have you tried the areca cards, they are slightly faster yet.
>
> Dave
>
> On 15-Nov-05, at 7:09 AM, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I agree - you can get a very good one from www.acmemicro.com or
>
> www.rackable.com with 8x 400GB SATA disks and the new 3Ware 9550SX SATA
>
> RAID controller for about $6K with two Opteron 272 CPUs and 8GB of RAM
>
> on a Tyan 2882 motherboard.  We get about 400MB/s sustained disk read
>
> performance on these (with tuning) on Linux using the xfs filesystem,
>
> which is one of the most critical factors for large databases.
>
>
>
>
> Note that you want to have your DBMS use all of the CPU and disk channel
>
> bandwidth you have on each query, which takes a parallel database like
>
> Bizgres MPP to achieve.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Next
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance PG 8.0 on dual opteron / 4GB / 3ware