Skip to content

[3.9] gh-93065: Fix HAMT to iterate correctly over 7-level deep trees (GH-93066) #93147

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Also while there, clarify a few things about why we reduce the hash to 32 bits.

Co-authored-by: Eli Libman eli@hyro.ai
Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov yury@edgedb.com
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa lukasz@langa.pl
(cherry picked from commit c1f5c90)

Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov yury@edgedb.com

…pythonGH-93066)

Also while there, clarify a few things about why we reduce the hash to 32 bits.

Co-authored-by: Eli Libman <eli@hyro.ai>
Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov <yury@edgedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
(cherry picked from commit c1f5c90)

Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov <yury@edgedb.com>
@miss-islington miss-islington requested a review from 1st1 as a code owner May 23, 2022 19:10
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@ambv ambv merged commit 95c9c2b into python:3.9 May 24, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-c1f5c90-3.9 branch May 24, 2022 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants