Use tomli and tomllib instead of toml#771
Merged
asottile merged 1 commit intopre-commit:mainfrom May 31, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
CI seems to fail because of lack of coverage on L8. I could add a |
Member
|
the correct pragmas would be |
Contributor
Author
Added and passing! 😄 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #755.
Originally this switch was rejected because the hope was that
tomlwould be updated at one point, see #608. However, the latest commit is from 1 November 2020 (commits) andtomliwill be part of Python3.11so it seems like a good candidate to replace it.Similar PRs have been used in other "mainstream" projects like python/mypy#12305 and pytest-dev/pytest#9741.