Remove unused config consoleproxy.cmd.port

[sureshanaparti]

Description

This PR removes unused config 'consoleproxy.cmd.port'.

The config 'consoleproxy.cmd.port' reference is removed in 4.11.1.0 here: #2562. Before 4.11.1.0, it is referenced but not used -

cloudstack/server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java

Lines 1246 to 1247 in b923c22

	String value = configs.get(Config.ConsoleProxyCmdPort.key());
	value = configs.get("consoleproxy.sslEnabled");

Fixes #11615

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR aims to remove the legacy/unused global setting consoleproxy.cmd.port as part of the 4.22.0.0 → 4.22.1.0 schema upgrade, to avoid exposing a misleading configuration option.

Changes:

• Adds a DB migration step to delete consoleproxy.cmd.port from cloud.configuration.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.60%. Comparing base (7c3637a) to head (bc12ec5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              4.22   #12807       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     3.70%   17.60%   +13.90%     
- Complexity       0    15663    +15663     
============================================
  Files          448     5917     +5469     
  Lines        38041   531523   +493482     
  Branches      7038    64981    +57943     
============================================
+ Hits          1409    93571    +92162     
- Misses       36445   427397   +390952     
- Partials       187    10555    +10368     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.70% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.67% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17126

[sudo87]

clgtm

[github-actions]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17241

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm, will be hard to prove completeness, but at least some manual regression testing will be needed.