Skip to content

[Bug] Review paper workflow #67

Closed

Description

@4ndrelim

Current review_paper is error-prone and expensive. This is due to diverse project structures and inconsistent sections naming. A more robust way in analyzing project files is in dev.

Activity

  1. moved this from Icebox to Design / Spec in Project PaperDebuggeron Dec 20, 2025
  2. self-assigned this
    on Dec 20, 2025
  3. linked a pull request that will close this issuefeat: XtraMCP ToolResult #74on Jan 4, 2026
  4. moved this from Design / Spec to Development & Blockers in Project PaperDebuggeron Jan 4, 2026
  5. moved this from Development & Blockers to Done in Project PaperDebuggeron Jan 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions