Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade @nestjs/platform-express from 10.4.22 to 11.0.13 - #127

Open
Dustin4444 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-4c1c6093bb9c5127e025d180272b6a1f
Open

Dustin4444 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-4c1c6093bb9c5127e025d180272b6a1f

Conversation

@Dustin4444

@Dustin4444 Dustin4444 commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/nestjs/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue
medium severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-QS-19432017
medium severity Uncaught Exception
SNYK-JS-QS-19432019

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
🦉 Uncaught Exception


This change is Reviewable

@Dustin4444

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Merge Risk: High

This is a major version upgrade from v10 to v11 which introduces several significant breaking changes that require developer action.

Key Breaking Changes:

  • Node.js Version Requirement: NestJS v11 requires Node.js v20 or higher. Support for Node.js v16 and v18 has been dropped.

  • Express v5 Integration: The framework now uses Express v5, which changes how route paths are matched. This is the most critical change for @nestjs/platform-express. Routes using an unnamed wildcard (*) will no longer work and must be updated to use a named wildcard.

    • Old Syntax (Invalid): @Get('users/*')
    • New Syntax (Valid): @Get('users/*splat')
  • Dynamic Module Instantiation: NestJS no longer uses hashes to deduplicate dynamic modules. If your application registers the same dynamic module in multiple places, you must now assign it to a variable and import that variable to maintain a singleton instance.

  • Middleware Registration Order: The logic for middleware registration order has been updated, which may affect applications that are sensitive to the exact order of execution.

  • Termination Hooks: The execution order for termination lifecycle hooks (OnModuleDestroy, OnApplicationShutdown) has been reversed to ensure a more logical cleanup sequence.

Recommendation:
This upgrade requires careful review and code modifications. Developers must verify their Node.js environment and audit all route definitions for the new wildcard syntax. It is highly recommended to consult the official migration guide before upgrading.

Source: NestJS v11 Migration Guide

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: a8c695f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Required label not found on this PR.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
  • 'feature'

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 680ee3a9-bb88-4776-8d8d-79bd2aeceda2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@warestack

warestack Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warestack Governance Checks

Warestack is installed for this GitHub account, but this repository is not ready to run governance checks yet.

Warestack lets your team define, enforce, and audit engineering standards directly on GitHub pull requests without leaving your workflow.

Get started in 2 minutes:

  1. Finish Warestack setup to activate governance for Dustin4444/backtrace-javascript
  2. Configure rules for pull request quality, CI requirements, commit conventions, and more
  3. Receive automated feedback on every pull request

This message is posted once per new pull request while this repository is not configured.

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
🔚 Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@socket-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Addednpm/​@​nestjs/​platform-express@​11.2.310010010097100

View full report

@socket-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm strtok3 is 90.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.90

Location: Package overview

From: packages/nestjs/package.json → npm/@nestjs/platform-express@11.2.3 → npm/strtok3@10.3.5

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/strtok3@10.3.5. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

@gitar-bot

gitar-bot Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

You are using the Gitar free plan. Upgrade to unlock code review, CI analysis, auto-apply, custom automations, and more.

Gitar

@amazon-q-developer

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Review Failed

I was unable to finalize my review because the pull request head or merge base was modified since I began my review. Please try again.

Request ID: 60f7889b-b120-5144-8e00-eb80df7044a5

"devDependencies": {
"@nestjs/core": "^10",
"@nestjs/platform-express": "^10",
"@nestjs/platform-express": "^11.0.13",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CRITICAL: Complete the NestJS v11 upgrade and lockfile update

@nestjs/platform-express is now v11, but @nestjs/core and @nestjs/testing remain v10, the @nestjs/common peer range still excludes v11, and package-lock.json still records the v10 dependency. This can make npm ci fail or install incompatible Nest packages; the CI matrix also tests on Node 16/18, while NestJS v11 requires Node 20+. Align the Nest dependencies and peer range, update the lockfile, and adjust supported Node versions/CI before merging.


Reply with @kilocode-bot fix it to have Kilo Code address this issue.

@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review Summary

Status: 1 Issues Found | Recommendation: Address before merge

Overview

Severity Count
CRITICAL 1
WARNING 0
SUGGESTION 0
Issue Details (click to expand)

CRITICAL

File Line Issue
packages/nestjs/package.json 47 NestJS v11 upgrade is incomplete: core/testing remain v10, the peer range excludes v11, the lockfile remains v10, and CI still tests Node 16/18.
Files Reviewed (1 files)
  • packages/nestjs/package.json - 1 issue

Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud


Reviewed by free · Input: 423.2K · Output: 14.3K · Cached: 399.2K

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants