Auto-activate nodejs manifest tests

[dd-octo-sts]

Automated activation of easy-win tests for nodejs
View nightly workflow run

• If you approve this PR please also merge it.
• If the tests are failing it might be due to a change made since the last nightly system-tests run. You can close the PR, an updated one will be available tomorrow.
• If you close the PR please also delete the branch

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

manifests/nodejs.yml                                                    @DataDog/dd-trace-js

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

⚠️ Tests

✨ Fix all issues with Cursor

⚠️ Warnings

❄️ 2 New flaky tests detected

tests.stats.test_stats.Test_Time_Bucketing.test_client_side_stats_bucket_alignment[fastify] from system_tests_suite (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)

AssertionError: Should have at least one stats bucket
assert 0 > 0
 +  where 0 = len([])

self = <tests.stats.test_stats.Test_Time_Bucketing object at 0x7ff8cc9be930>

    def test_client_side_stats_bucket_alignment(self):
        """Test that client-side stats are aligned on 10-second intervals"""
        stats_requests = list(interfaces.library.get_data("/v0.6/stats"))
        assert len(stats_requests) > 0, "Should have at least one stats request"
...

tests.stats.test_stats.Test_Time_Bucketing.test_client_side_stats[fastify] from system_tests_suite (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)

AssertionError: Should have at least one stats bucket
assert 0 > 0
 +  where 0 = len([])

self = <tests.stats.test_stats.Test_Time_Bucketing object at 0x7ff8cc9bda60>

    def test_client_side_stats(self):
        """Test that client-side stats are properly bucketed in 10-second intervals"""
        stats_requests = list(interfaces.library.get_data("/v0.6/stats"))
        assert len(stats_requests) > 0, "Should have at least one stats request"
...

ℹ️ Info

🧪 All tests passed

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 49ce8af | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? Give us feedback!}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a2f93d557a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[watson]

@nccatoni I had to disable the auto-merge due to the false easy-win that would start to fail once #6129 merged

[nccatoni]

Thanks @watson, I fixed the issue

[simon-id]

lots of weird changes in there, will take a look later

[simon-id]

We made some changes on the side about stuff in this PR so i'll close this one, and the bot will post a fresh one tomorrow hopefully