Is Java Purely object oriented language? need a full explanation
ganesh641 0 Newbie Poster
Recommended Answers
Jump to PostFind (or invent) a definition for "Purely object oriented language" (there is no official, (e.g. IEEE) definition for it BTW), then think about whether anything about the language doesn't fit that.
Jump to PostOne thing puzzles me though; why do you NEED a FULL explanation?
Because he was asked (at least something like) that as part of a test or interview, of course. Give me teh codez.
Jump to PostYou can place primitives into collections due to autoboxing, where the primitive will be automatically converted into it's respective object, and when the Generics are set up properly it can be autounboxed (automatically converted back to it's primitive) without any casting. That has nothing to do with whether the primitives …
Jump to PostIn my opinion, this discussion is not taking us anywhere useful.
it is. It's showing how useless the topic is.
All 13 Replies
masijade 1,351 Industrious Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
JamesCherrill 4,733 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
mKorbel 274 Veteran Poster
ablecom 0 Newbie Poster
masijade 1,351 Industrious Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
JamesCherrill 4,733 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
ganesh641 0 Newbie Poster
masijade 1,351 Industrious Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
Sadun89 -16 Junior Poster
ablecom 0 Newbie Poster
jwenting 1,905 duckman Team Colleague
lisaroy1 0 Light Poster
Sadun89 -16 Junior Poster
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.